David Evans

and 3 more

Reconstructing past changes in global mean surface temperature (GMST) is one of the key contributions that palaeoclimate science can make in addressing societally relevant questions and is required to determine equilibrium climate sensitivity (ECS). Previous work has suggested that the temperature of the deep ocean (Td) can be used to determine GMST with a simple Td-GMST scaling factor of 1 prior to the Pliocene. However, this metric lacks a robust mechanistic basis, and indeed, such a relationship is intuitively difficult to envisage given that polar amplification is a ubiquitous feature of past warm climate states and deep water overwhelmingly forms at high latitudes. Here, we interrogate whether and crucially, why, this relationship exists using a suite of curated data compilations generated for key deep-time climate intervals as well as two independent sets of palaeoclimate model simulations. We show that models and data are in full agreement that a 1:1 relationship is a good approximation. Mechanistically, both sets of climate models suggest that i) increasingly seasonally biased deep water formation, and ii) a faster rate of land versus ocean surface warming are the two processes that act to counterbalance a possible polar amplification-derived bias on Td-derived GMST. Using this knowledge, we interrogate the quality of the existing deep ocean temperature datasets and provide a new Cenozoic record of GMST. Our estimates are substantially warmer than similar previous efforts for much of the Paleogene and are thus consistent with a substantially higher-than-modern ECS during deep-time high CO2 climate states.

Maria Dance

and 4 more

Aim: Rangifer tarandus L. play a key role in Arctic ecosystems as the most numerous and widespread large herbivore. Sea ice is vital for maintaining genetic connectivity in Arctic islands, yet the historical role of sea ice in shaping Rangifer biogeography is unknown. We study the timing of island dispersal and the role of sea ice changes and ice sheet retreat since the last glacial period. Methods: We compiled published datasets of mitochondrial DNA sequences which informed population history scenarios, evaluated in a coalescent-based approximate Bayesian computation (ABC) modelling framework to test hypotheses of island (re)colonisation and to estimate timings of divergence and admixture. Population events were compared with modelled and proxy-based paleo-sea ice cover and published ice sheet chronologies. Results: Our analysis supports Holocene dispersal onto deglaciated Arctic islands rather than High Arctic glacial refugia. The degree of population admixture and the effect of sea ice was dependent on regional geography and climate history. North American initial island population divergence occurred as sea ice cover was declining. A lack of strong genetic structure and late Holocene admixture suggest that island populations were somewhat connected by sea ice during the Holocene. The Svalbard and West Greenland divergence times lagged deglaciation but broadly align with fossil-based estimates of colonisation, suggesting dispersal limitation due to sea ice conditions, potentially modulated by ocean currents and sea ice drift. Main conclusions: Our study sheds light on the Late Quaternary (~60 ka - present) history of Arctic island Rangifer and suggests that ice sheet retreat, sea ice cover, and ocean currents were important in shaping present-day genetic patterns. Regional differences in postglacial dynamics suggest that dispersal during contemporary climate change may vary regionally and depend upon decreasing connectivity provided by sea ice.

Yvan Malo Romé

and 4 more

Our limited understanding of millennial-scale variability in the context of the last glacial period can be explained by the lack of a reliable modelling framework to study abrupt climate changes under realistic glacial backgrounds. In this article, we describe a new set of long-run Last Glacial Maximum experiments where such climate shifts were triggered by different snapshots of ice-sheet meltwater derived from the early stages of the last deglaciation. Depending on the location and the magnitude of the forcing, we observe three distinct dynamical regimes and highlight a subtle window of opportunity where the climate can sustain oscillations between cold and warm modes. We identify the European-Arctic and Nordic Seas regions as being most sensitive to meltwater discharge in the context of switching to a cold mode, compared to freshwater fluxes from the Laurentide ice sheets. These cold climates follow a consistent pattern in temperature, sea ice and convection, and are largely independent from freshwater release as a result of effective AMOC collapse. Warm modes, on the other hand, show more complexity in their response to the regional pattern of the meltwater input, and within them, we observe significant differences linked to the reorganisation of deep water formation sites and the subpolar gyre. Broadly, the main characteristics of the oscillations, obtained under full-glacial conditions with realistically low meltwater discharge, are comparable to δ18O records of the last glacial period, although our simplified experiment design prevents detailed conclusions from being drawn on whether these represent actual Dansgaard-Oeschger events.