Anorthosites are attractive paleomagnetic recorders as silicate-hosted magnetite inclusions can be single-domain and be shielded from alteration. However, petrofabrics within anorthosites may result in magnetic remanence anisotropy that is potentially detrimental to recovering paleomagnetic direction and intensity. The Beaver River diabase of the North American Midcontinent Rift contains abundant nearly 100 percent plagioclase anorthosite xenoliths that are hypothesized to have been liberated from the lower crust by the magma enroute to becoming embedded in shallow crustal sills. In this study, we compare the remanent paleomagnetic directions recorded by anorthosite xenoliths to those of the Beaver River diabase host rocks. Given that both lithologies should record the same thermal remanent magnetization, this comparison provides a means to assess the effects of remanence anisotropy on the paleodirection recorded by the anorthosites. Thermal and anhysteretic remanence (TRM and ARM) anisotropy experiments, which are typically used to assess for anisotropy, can be compared to the natural remanence of the diabase and anorthosite in this geologic experiment that was conducted 1.1 billion years ago. Paleodirection data from the interior of the largest (>300 m) anorthosite xenoliths also have the potential to test their hypothetical lower crustal origin. An origin below the Curie depth would result in a full thermal remanence from the time of diabase emplacement, while a shallower origin from above the Curie depth could have resulted in a distinct remanence direction in the xenolith interior that predates the intrusion (with samples from the exterior having acquired a Beaver River diabase coeval thermal remanence in either scenario). Overall, this novel geological association between diabase and anorthosite provides a means to assess the effects of remanence anisotropy providing valuable context for efforts to use anorthosites to understand the ancient geomagnetic field.