Yuxi Chen

and 3 more

Xiantong Wang

and 2 more

We perform a geomagnetic event simulation using a newly developed magnetohydrodynamic with adaptively embedded particle-in-cell (MHD-AEPIC) model. We have developed effective criteria to identify reconnection sites in the magnetotail and cover them with the PIC model. The MHD-AEPIC simulation results are compared with Hall MHD and ideal MHD simulations to study the impacts of kinetic reconnection at multiple physical scales. At the global scale, the three models produce very similar SYM-H and SuperMag Electrojet (SME) indexes, which indicates that the global magnetic field configurations from the three models are very close to each other. We also compare the ionospheric solver results and all three models generate similar polar cap potentials and field aligned currents. At the mesoscale we compare the simulations with in situ Geotail observations in the tail. All three models produce reasonable agreement with the Geotail observations. At the kinetic scales, the MHD-AEPIC simulation can produce a crescent shape distribution of the electron velocity space at the electron diffusion region which agrees very well with MMS observations near a tail reconnection site. These electron scale kinetic features are not available in either the Hall MHD or ideal MHD models. Overall, the MHD-AEPIC model compares well with observations at all scales, it works robustly, and the computational cost is acceptable due to the adaptive adjustment of the PIC domain. It remains to be determined whether kinetic physics can play a more significant role in other types of events, including but not limited to substorms.

Agnit Mukhopadhyay

and 10 more

The accurate determination of auroral precipitation in global models has remained a daunting and rather inexplicable obstacle. Understanding the calculation and balance of multiple sources that constitute the aurora, and their eventual conversion into ionospheric electrical conductance, is critical for improved prediction of space weather events. In this study, we present a semi-physical global modeling approach that characterizes contributions by four types of precipitation - monoenergetic, broadband, electron and ion diffuse - to ionospheric electrodynamics. The model uses a combination of adiabatic kinetic theory and loss parameters derived from historical energy flux patterns to estimate auroral precipitation from magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) quantities. It then converts them into ionospheric conductance that is used to compute the ionospheric feedback to the magnetosphere. The model has been employed to simulate the April 5 - 7, 2010 “Galaxy15” space weather event. Comparison of auroral fluxes show good agreement with observational datasets like NOAA-DMSP and OVATION Prime. The study shows a dominant contribution by electron diffuse precipitation, accounting for ~74% of the auroral energy flux. However, contributions by monoenergetic and broadband sources dominate during times of active upstream conditions, providing for up to 61% of the total hemispheric power. The study also indicates a dominant role played by broadband precipitation in ionospheric electrodynamics which accounts for ~31% of the Pedersen conductance.

Qusai Al Shidi

and 4 more

Space weather monitoring and predictions largely rely on ground magnetic measurements and geomagnetic indices such as the Disturbance Storm Time index (Dst or SYM-H), Auroral Electrojet Index (AL) or the Polar Cap Index (PCI) all constructed using the individual station data. The global MHD simulations such as the Space Weather Modeling Framework (SWMF) can give predictions of these indices, driven by solar wind observations obtained at L1 giving roughly one hour lead time. The accuracy of these predictions especially during geomagnetic storms is a key metric for the model performance, and critical to operational space weather forecasts. In this presentation, we perform the largest statistical study of global simulation results using a database of 140 storms with minimum Dst below -50 nT during the years from 2010 to 2020. We compare SWMF results with indices derived from the SuperMAG network, which with its denser station network provides a more accurate representation of the true level of activity in the ring current and in the auroral electrojets. We show that the SWMF generally gives good results for the SYM-H index, whereas the AL index is typically underestimated by the model with the model predicting lower than observed ionospheric activity. We also examine the Cross Polar Cap Potential (CPCP) and compare it with a model derived using the PCI (Ridley et al., 2004) as well as with results obtained from the SuperDARN network. We show that the Ridley et al. CPCP model is much closer to the SWMF values. The results are used to discuss factors governing energy dissipation in magnetosphere - ionosphere system as well as possibilities to improve on the operational space weather forecasts.

Souhail Dahani

and 15 more

Flux Transfer Events (FTEs) are transient magnetic flux ropes typically found at the Earth’s magnetopause on the dayside. While it is known that FTEs are generated by magnetic reconnection, it remains unclear how the details of magnetic reconnection controls their properties. A recent study showed that the helicity sign of FTEs positively correlates with the east-west (By) component of the Interplanetary Magnetic Field (IMF). With data from the Cluster and Magnetospheric Multiscale missions, we performed a statistical study of 166 quasi force-free FTEs. We focus on their helicity sign and possible association with upstream solar wind conditions and local magnetic reconnection properties. Using both in situ data and magnetic shear modeling, we find that FTEs whose helicity sign corresponds to the IMF By are associated with moderate magnetic shears while those that does not correspond to the IMF By are associated with higher magnetic shears. While uncertainty in IMF propagation to the magnetopause may lead to randomness in the determination of the flux rope core field and helicity, we rather propose that for small IMF By, which corresponds to high shear and low guide field, the Hall pattern of magnetic reconnection determines the FTE core field and helicity sign. In that context we explain how the temporal sequence of multiple X-line formation and the reconnection rate are important in determining the flux rope helicity sign. This work highlights a fundamental connection between kinetic processes at work in magnetic reconnection and the macroscale structure of FTEs.