Information of authors:
Zheng Zhou: Johann Friedrich Blumenbach Institute of Zoology and
Anthropology, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany;
zzhou@gwdg.de
Jing-Zhong Lu: Johann Friedrich Blumenbach Institute of Zoology and
Anthropology, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany;
jlu@gwdg.de
Rahayu Widyastuti: Department of Soil Sciences and Land Resources,
Institut Pertanian Bogor (IPB), Bogor, Indonesia;
oety76@yahoo.com
Stefan Scheu: Johann Friedrich Blumenbach Institute of Zoology and
Anthropology, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany; Centre of
Biodiversity and Sustainable Land Use, Göttingen, Germany;
sscheu@gwdg.de
Anton Potapov: Johann Friedrich Blumenbach Institute of Zoology and
Anthropology, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany; German Centre
for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig,
Leipzig, Germany; Faculty of Biology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig,
Germany;
potapov.msu@gmail.com
Valentyna Krashevska: Johann Friedrich Blumenbach Institute of Zoology
and Anthropology, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany;
vkrashe@gwdg.de
Correspondence: Zheng Zhou; Telephone: + 49 (0) 162 8009139;
E-mail address: zzhou@gwdg.de;
Fax numbers: +49 (0) 551 395448
Authorship: VK, AP and SS designed the research. VK and RW
conducted the experiment and collected data. ZZ analysed the data with
advice from AP, VK, JL and SS. The manuscript was written by ZZ with
advice from AP, VK and SS. All authors contributed substantially to
revisions.
Data accessibility statement: Should the manuscript be
accepted, the data supporting the results will be archived in an
appropriate public repository and the data DOI will be included at the
end of the article.
Plant roots link stronger with microorganisms in leaf litter rather than
soil across tropical land-use systems
Zheng Zhou1, Jing-Zhong Lu1, Rahayu
Widyastuti2, Stefan Scheu1,3*, Anton
Potapov1,4,5*, Valentyna
Krashevska1*
1. Johann Friedrich Blumenbach Institute of Zoology and Anthropology,
University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
2. Department of Soil Sciences and Land Resources, Institut Pertanian
Bogor (IPB), Bogor, Indonesia
3. Centre of Biodiversity and Sustainable Land Use, University of
Göttingen, Germany
4. German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv)
Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
5. Faculty of Biology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
* These authors contributed equally to this work.
Abstract
Tropical soil microorganisms are major recyclers of biosphere organic
carbon. However, the link of tropical microorganisms to the two primary
carbon inputs (roots and litter) remains unclear. Here, we studied the
effects of excluding living roots and litter on microorganisms in leaf
litter and topsoil in rainforests and plantations in Sumatra, Indonesia.
Unexpectedly, excluding living roots strongly decreased microbial
biomass and basal respiration in litter but not in soil, indicating that
tropical trees prioritize mining for nutrients in litter layer rather
than mineral soil. Contrary to litter, soil microbial communities were
predominantly influenced by long-term factors related to land-use
history. Litter removal neither significantly affected microbial biomass
nor community structure in soil, suggesting compartmentalized carbon
processing between litter and soil. Our study sheds new light on
fundamental-ecosystem processes in the tropics and calls for greater
consideration of the litter layer and for including root-derived
resources in global carbon cycling models.
Keywords: roots; litter; land use; deforestation; microbial
biomass; basal resources; trenching
Introduction
Approximately ninety percent of the biomass produced by terrestrial
plants is entering the belowground system, where it fuels complex food
webs and supports a quarter of the total biodiversity on Earth (Cebrian
1999; Guerra et al. 2021). Soils store approximately twice as
much carbon as the atmosphere (Schimel 1995; Crowther et al.2019), with the soil carbon storage and cycling being mainly driven by
microorganisms (Bardgett & Wardle 2010; Liang et al. 2017). Soil
microorganisms are key players in the transformation and processing of
carbon and nutrients in belowground food webs, serving as the core of
terrestrial ecosystem functioning (van der Heijden et al. 2008;
Delgado-Baquerizo et al. 2016). Plant carbon enters the
belowground system via litter and roots – the two principle resources
for soil microorganisms – both controlling the size, activity and
composition of the soil microbial community (Bever et al. 2010;
Schlatter et al. 2015; Hassani et al. 2018).
Plant litter represents the major source of carbon entering the soil
from aboveground that fuels numerous litter decomposers and shapes the
structure of microbial communities (McBride et al. 2020). After
transformation and translocation into the mineral soil, litter compounds
including cellulose, lignin, lipids and sugars, together with
microbial-derived carbon are stabilized in soil organic matter which is
protected by minerals and aggregates (Angst et al. 2021).
However, plant carbon may reach mineral soil layers much more rapidly
via the root pathway. A major fraction of photosynthetically fixed
carbon is allocated to roots and is exuded into the soil actively or
passively (Bais et al. 2006). The labile carbon compounds
exudated by roots activate microorganisms in the rhizosphere and also
affect microbial communities in bulk soil (Haichar et al. 2008;
Zhou et al. 2020). It has been estimated that root-derived
resources are responsible for up to half of soil respiration in
temperate forests (Hanson et al. 2000; Díaz-Pinés et al.2010). Changes in microbial activity also result in changes in the
composition of microbial communities, particularly in the root vicinity
(Paterson et al. 2007; Haichar et al. 2008). The
interactions between roots and microorganisms cause distinct populations
in the rhizosphere compared to those elsewhere in the soil (Ballauffet al. 2021). As known from temperate forests, root-associated
fungi also affect decomposition of leaf litter by speeding up or slowing
down decomposition processes via Priming or Gadgil effects (Talbotet al. 2008; Fernandez & Kennedy 2016; Lang et al. 2021).
Plant roots and associated microorganisms exploit nutrients from soil
and litter, and thereby interact with microorganisms in both soil and
litter layers. Root associated microorganisms in soil may translocate
nutrients into the litter thereby affecting litter decomposition and
plant mining for nutrients (Bunn et al. 2019). However, little
research has been conducted on the impact of living roots on
microorganisms in litter. Further, there generally is a lack of studies
investigating interactive effects of litter and root resources on the
structure and functioning of microbial communities in soil as most
studies either manipulated litter- or root-derived resources but not
both. This is especially true for tropical ecosystems, where dominant
mycorrhiza, climate and nutrient limitation differ significantly from
temperate regions (Malloch et al. 1980; Camenzind et al.2018).
The tropics account for over half of the global annual production of
CO2 of terrestrial ecosystems, and tropical rainforests
play an important role as carbon sink in the global carbon cycle
(Baccini et al. 2017; Mitchard 2018). Tropical ecosystems harbour
some of the oldest and most nutrient-impoverished soils, which may also
be severely depleted in soil organic matter, whereas large amounts of C
is stored in living biomass, i.e., trees (West et al. 2010;
Hartshorn 2013). Further, tropical soils are more limited by phosphorus
compared to soils of temperate and boreal regions, where nitrogen
typically is the primary limiting element (Camenzind et al.2018). Nutrient limitation results in competition for litter-derived
nutrients between saprotrophic and mycorrhizal microorganisms. To access
nutrients released during litter decomposition, plant roots may colonise
litter, which is likely to be more prevalent in tropical P-limited than
in high latitude N-limited ecosystems (Xu et al. 2018; Langet al. 2021). This may result in a stronger linkage between
root-associated microbes and litter resources in the litter layer in
tropical than in high latitude ecosystems, but this hypothesis remains
untested.
Meanwhile, the tropics are at the forefront of agricultural expansion
(Laurance et al. 2014; Grass et al. 2020). Conversion of
tropical rainforest into agricultural production systems greatly reduces
the amount of litter in organic layers and changes carbon cycling
(Guillaume et al. 2018; Potapov et al. 2019; Veldkampet al. 2020), and thereby the structure of above- and belowground
communities (Rembold et al. 2017; Zhou et al. 2022). The
composition of soil microbial communities changes strongly with the
conversion of rainforest into agricultural land-use systems (Krashevskaet al. 2015; Schneider et al. 2015; Ballauff et al.2021). However, the roles of the two principle resources, i.e., living
roots and litter, in modifying belowground microbial communities in
response to land-use change remain unknown. Whereas short-term resource
supply, such as root exudates, provides energy for microbial growth and
activity (Hanson et al. 2000; Díaz-Pinés et al. 2010),
long-term factors, such as land-use type and soil development, may pose
general limits on microbial community composition and biomass (Bissettet al. 2011; Lauber et al. 2013). Understanding the
dynamics of both short-term resource supply and long-term factors is
essential for predicting the response of soil microbial communities to
environmental change and for maintaining soil ecosystem services.
Therefore, the role of litter- and root-derived resources for the
structure and functioning of microbial communities needs to be
investigated across ecosystems of different land-use history.
In this study, we investigated the effects of the deprivation of
resource input via living roots and aboveground leaf litter on microbial
biomass, respiration and community composition in the litter layer, and
in 0-5 and 5-10 cm of the underlying mineral soil. We conducted a
full-factorial root-trenching and litter-removal experiment in
rainforest and plantations of rubber and oil palm in Sumatra, Indonesia
(Zhou et al. 2023). We focused on three critical knowledge gaps:
(1) unknown relative importance of root- and litter-derived resources
for microbial communities in soil and litter of different tropical
land-use types, (2) unknown shifts in the role of root-derived resources
for soil and litter microorganisms under land-use change, and (3) the
contribution of short-term resource supply (root and litter resources)vs long-term factors (land use and soil layers) in shaping soil
microbial communities. By assessing microbial biomass, basal respiration
and phospholipid fatty acid (PLFA) patterns across litter and soil
layers as well as land-use types, we analysed changes in microbial
community structure and functioning after the deprivation of root and
litter resources. Specifically, we tested the following hypotheses:
1) Root trenching causes a reduction in microbial biomass and soil
respiration, and induces changes in the microbial community structure,
with the changes being more pronounced in soil than in litter due to
closer spatial association of roots with soil than with litter.
2) Effects of litter removal on soil microbial activity and community
composition are weaker in plantations than in rainforest, as a result of
reduced litter resources.
3) Long-term factors (land-use type and soil layer) are more important
than the deprivation of short-term resource supply (root and/or litter
resources) for microbial community structure, whereas short-term
resource supply has a greater impact on total microbial biomass and soil
respiration.
Materials and methods
1. Study sites, experimental set-up and soil sampling
The
study was conducted in Jambi province, Sumatra, Indonesia. Over the past
25-35 years, the lowland rainforests in Sumatra have been largely
replaced by intensively managed plantations, primarily consisting of oil
palm and rubber (Margono et al. 2012; Drescher et al.2016). Our experiment was established across three distinct land-use
types, i.e., rainforest, rubber plantations and oil palm plantations
located southeast of the city of Jambi (‘Harapan landscape’; 1˚ 55’ 40”
S, 103˚ 15’ 33” E), in October 2016. The experiment was set-up in a
factorial design with four experimental treatments: control, root
trenching, litter removal and both root trenching and litter removal.
Each land-use type was replicated four times resulting in a total of 12
sites (48 experimental plots) spread across an area of ca. 35 km
diameter with adjacent sites spaced apart by 0.5–5 km. For more details
of the experimental design see Zhou et al. (2023).
In September-October 2017, i.e., one year after the experimental setup,
litter and soil (0–5 and 5–10 cm depth) samples were collected using a
corer of a diameter of 5 cm. To account for potential spatial
variability, three cores were taken per plot and the material from
respective layers were pooled as one sample. In total, 144 pooled
samples were collected (i.e., 4 treatments ⨯ 3 land-use types ⨯ 3 layers
⨯ 4 sites). The samples were transported to the laboratory within 1-2
days after collection, where the soil samples were sieved through a 2 mm
mesh and litter samples were cut into pieces < 25
mm2. Then, all samples were stored at -20°C for later
analysis.
Water content was measured by drying samples at 65 °C for 48 h. Water
content in soil was significantly increased after root trenching in
rainforest and rubber plantations (F1, 63=31.78,
p<0.001), but this was not the case in litter. Litter removal
did not significantly affect soil moisture in the two soil depths.
We also assessed the biomass of fine roots (diameter < 2 mm)
in the litter layer and in 0-5 cm soil depth next to the experimental
plots by taking 16 cm × 16 cm soil cores from three sub-sites in each
study site. Soil was weighed and washed through a 1-mm sieve to extract
roots; roots from litter were hand-picked. After drying at 65 °C for 48
h, roots of < 2 mm diameter were weighed and the results are
given as the amount of dry roots per kilogram of dry litter or soil,
i.e., root density.
2. Basal respiration and microbial biomass
Prior to respiration measurements, an aliquot of the pooled samples,
i.e., 3 g soil and 0.5 g litter (dry weight equivalent) were thawed at
4°C for three days and then placed at room temperature for seven days to
allow equilibration. Basal respiration was measured as
O2 consumption and microbial biomass was measured by
substrate-induced respiration (Anderson & Domsch 1978; Scheu 1992). The
microbial respiratory response was measured at hourly intervals at 22 °C
for 24 h. Basal respiration (μg O2 g-1h-1) was determined without addition of substrate and
measured as mean O2 consumption rates 11–21 h after
attachment of the vials to the measurement system. Microbial biomass was
determined based on the maximum initial respiratory response (MIRR; μg
O2 g-1 h-1) after
adding glucose (10 mg per gram of soil and 80 mg per gram of litter dry
weight) to saturate microbial glycolytic enzymes; MIRR readings were
taken 4-7 h after glucose addition. MIRR was converted to microbial
biomass (Cmic; μg Cmicg-1) as 38 × MIRR (Beck et al. 1997). Microbial
specific respiration was calculated as the ratio between microbial basal
respiration and microbial biomass (qO2; μg
O2 μg-1 Cmich-1).
3. Phospholipid fatty acid analysis
Our study emphasizes the functional perspective of microbial
communities, and accordingly, we opted to use phospholipid fatty acid
(PLFA) analysis as quantitative and highly sensitive method for
analysing microbial community composition (Orwin et al. 2018;
Joergensen 2022). PLFAs were extracted from the frozen samples of litter
(2 g) and soil (4 g) using a modified Bligh and Dyer method (Frostegårdet al. 1993). Briefly, lipids were fractionated into neutral
lipids, glycolipids and phospholipids by elution through silica acid
columns using Bligh/Dyer solvent [chloroform, methanol, citrate buffer
(pH 4); 1:2:0.8]. Phospholipids were then subjected to mild alkaline
methanolysis and fatty acid methyl esters were identified by
chromatographic retention time compared to standards (FAME CRM47885, C11
to C24; BAME 47080-U, C11 to C20; Sigma-Aldrich, Darmstadt, Germany)
using a GC-FID Clarus 500 (PerkinElmer Corporation, Norwalk, USA)
equipped with an Elite 5 column (30 m × 0.32 mm inner diameter, film
thickness 0.25 μm). The temperature program started with 60 °C (held for
1 min) and increased by 30 °C per min to 160 °C followed by 3 °C per min
to 280 °C. The injection temperature was 250 °C and helium was used as
carrier gas. PLFA data of seven of the 144 samples are missing due to an
analytical error (Supplementary data table).
PLFA abundances were calculated as nmol per gram dry weight of soil and
litter. Total PLFAs included all identified PLFAs (nmol
g-1), which was used to complement
Cmic analysis as an additional measure of microbial
biomass. The PLFAs were separated and used as markers for Gram-positive
bacteria (Gram+), Gram-negative bacteria
(Gram-), fungi and arbuscular mycorrhiza fungi (AMF).
And the ratio between some particular PLFAs were used as indicators of
fungi/bacteria ratio, carbon limitation, physiological or nutritional
stress, for more details see Appendix 1.
4. Statistical analysis
All analyses were done in R 4.0.3 (R Core Team 2020). To assess the
effect size of litter removal and root trenching on microbial responses,
we fitted linear mixed-effects models (LMMs) and then applied contrasts
between resource exclusion (either no litter or no root) and resource
inclusion (either litter or root). Response variables included basal and
specific respiration, microbial biomass, PLFA markers
(Gram+ bacteria, Gram- bacteria,
total bacteria, fungi and AMF) and PLFA indicators (carbon limitation,
fungi/bacteria ratio, physiological and nutritional stress). All PLFA
markers were analysed as proportions of the total PLFA amount in the
sample (mole percentage) and these propotional data were
logit-transfromed prior to analyses (Warton & Hui 2011). Microbial
biomass, PLFA indicators, basal and specific respiration data were
log-transfromed due to a left-skewed distribution. The litter removal
effect was calculated as the difference between ‘control’ + ‘trenching’
vs ‘litter removal’ + ‘litter removal and trenching’. The root trenching
effect represents the difference between ‘control’ + ‘litter removal’ vs
‘trenching’ + ‘litter removal and trenching’. The residuals of all mixed
models were visually checked and met the assumption of homogeneity of
variance.
The models were run separately for litter and soil (0-5 and 5-10 cm soil
depth), as litter was excluded in the litter removal treatment. For
litter, the LMMs included root trenching (trenching/no trenching),
land-use type (rainforest, rubber and oil palm plantations) and their
interaction as fixed factors, with site as random factor to account for
interdependence of treatments from the same site. For soil, the LMMs
included root trenching (trenching/no trenching), litter (removal/no
removal), land-use type (rainforest, rubber and oil palm plantations),
soil depth (0-5 and 5-10 cm), their pairwise interactions and mositure
content as fixed factors, with treatment nested within site as random
effect to account for interdependence of layers from the same soil core
and treatments from the same site. We inclued mositure as fixed factor
to account for potential side effects of trenching on microbial
communities via changes in soil mositure.
To analyse the influence of land use and treatments on microbial
community structure, PLFA composition were analysed by Bray–Curtis
dissimilarity-based PERMANOVA and visualized by non-metric
multidimensional scaling (NMDS). Only PLFAs present in more than half of
the plots were included in the analysis. PERMANOVA was used to first
analyze changes in PLFA composition with land use and treatments in each
layer (litter, 0-5 and 5-10 cm soil depth). Thereafter, we analyzed the
changes in PLFA composition with depth and land use in the two soil
depth in a single model without litter.
To assess differences in root density between layers and land-use types,
we used two-way analysis of variance with land-use type and layers as
independent variables followed by post hoc comparison of means using
Tukey’s honestly significant difference (HSD) test to inspect
differences between means. Data were log-transfromed to fit normal
distribution prior to the analysis.
The vegan package was used for NMDS and PERMANOVA analysis
(Oksanen et al. 2020); the nlme package was used to fit
LMMs (Bates et al. 2015; Pinheiro et al. 2022) and theemmeans package was used to conduct planned contrasts (Lenth
2021). Pairwise comparisons of root biomass among land-use types were
done using post hoc HSD.test function from the package agricolaefollowing analyses of variance (Mendiburu 2020). Results were visualized
using ggplot2 (Wickham 2016).
Results
1. Changes in basal respiration and microbial biomass
In the litter layer, root trenching reduced microbial basal respiration,
microbial biomass and total PLFAs by 37.7 ± 9.4 % (estimated mean ±
standard error), 31.9 ± 10.6 % and 37.1 ± 12.3 % across land-use types
(Figs 2, 3a; Tables S1, S2); there were generally no significant
interactions between root trenching and land use, but the effects of
root trenching on microbial biomass were in trend stronger in oil palm
plantations (F2,9=3.73, p =0.066; Tables S1). In
the two soil depths studied, by contrast, both root trenching and litter
removal did not significantly affect microbial basal respiration,
microbial biomass and total PLFAs (Figs 2, 3a; Table S1). Microbial
specific respiration in litter and soil generally was not significantly
affected by the experimental treatments, but varied significantly with
land use and soil depth (Fig. 2; Table S1).
Land-use type and soil depth (as ‘long-term’ factors) strongly affected
microbial biomass across treatments (Figs 2, 3b, S2;
F2,10=5.2, p =0.027 and
F1,48=18.79, p <0.001, respectively).
Basal respiration and microbial biomass in both litter and soil were
about two times higher in rainforest and rubber plantations than in oil
palm plantations (Figs. S2; Table S5). Consistently across land-use
types and treatments, basal respiration, microbial biomass and total
PLFAs decreased with soil depth, each being about ten times higher in
litter than in soil (Fig. 3b), and two times higher in 0-5 than 5-10 cm
soil depth (Fig. S2; Table S4).
2. Microbial community structure and functioning
As indicated by the proportional PLFAs composition, microbial community
structure in the litter layer was not affected by root trenching but by
land-use types (PERMANOVA: F1,14 = 0.97, p =
0.421 and F2,14 = 4.16, p = 0.002, respectively;
Fig. 4a). By contrast, microbial community structure in the two soil
depths was significantly affected by root trenching (PERMANOVA:
F1,62 = 4.56, p = 0.002) and strongly changed
with land use and depth (PERMANOVA; F2,59 = 11.45,p < 0.001 and F1,59 = 14.53, p< 0.001, respectively; Fig. 4b,c,d) but not after litter
removal (PERMANOVA: F1,59 = 0.98, p = 0.463).
In soil, root trenching decreased the relative abundance of fungi by
41.8 ± 9.1% and 35.9 ± 8.7% in 0-5 and 5-10 cm depth in comparison to
the control, respectively (Fig. 5a, Table S3). Trenching also decreased
the relative abundance of AMF by 17.3 ± 4.2% and 15.5 ± 3.9% in 0-5
and 5-10 cm depth, respectively, with the effects being significant in
rainforest and oil plan plantations (-22.1± 5.3% and -22.1± 5.3%) but
not in rubber plantations (Figs 2, 5a, Table S3). In addition, the
effects of root trenching on AMF were influenced by the removal of
litter; in the presence of litter, trenching decreased AMF by 23.4 ±
3.3%, whereas the effect of trenching was not significant when litter
was absent (Fig. 2).
Litter removal had no general effects on soil microorganisms across
land-use types and depths (Fig. 2). Litter removal increased the
relative abundance of fungi but only in soil at 0-5 cm depth (+42.9 ±
18.8%) and increased the relative abundance of AMF but only in soil at
5-10 cm depth (+9.0 ± 4.6%). Litter removal decreased the relative
abundance of bacteria by 12.2 ± 4.9% and Gram-bacteria by 20.2 ± 7.4% in rainforest (Fig. 2). In addition, the
relative abundance of fungi was higher in litter than in soil and the
relative abundance of bacteria was higher in soil than in litter (Fig.
5b).
3. Fine root density
Fine root density per mass of substrate was significantly different
between layers (F1,18 = 113.55, p < 0.001) and
land-use types (F2,18 = 13.94, p < 0.001),
being more than ten times higher in litter (76.5 ± 29.6 g
kg-1) than in soil (4.9 ± 0.9 g
kg-1) across land-use types. In the litter layer, fine
root density was higher in oil palm plantations (166.7 ± 73.4 g
kg-1) than in rainforest (41.5 ± 9.2 g
kg-1) and rubber plantations (21.4 ± 4.6 g
kg-1), while in soil it did not vary significantly
among land-use types (Fig. S3).
Discussion
We assessed the effects of litter- and root-derived resources on the
biomass, respiration and functional group structure of microbial
communities by root trenching and litter removal in tropical rainforest
and plantations. For the first time we tested the different roles of
living roots on tropical microbial communities in both litter and
mineral soil. In contrast to our first hypothesis, effects of the
exclusion of living roots on microbial biomass and respiration in litter
were more pronounced than in soil, and this was consistent across the
studied tropical land-use systems. By contrast, root trenching did not
significantly affect microbial biomass and basal respiration in soil,
but reduced the relative abundance of saprotrophic and mycorrhizal
fungi. Contrasting our second hypothesis, litter removal generally did
not significantly affect soil microorganisms, however, the effects of
root trenching on soil fungi were weaker when litter was removed.
Overall, across the studied tropical ecosystems plant roots were more
strongly linked to litter than to soil microorganisms, while biomass and
community structure of soil microorganisms were affected primarily by
‘long-term’ factors, i.e., land use and soil depth, partly supporting
our third hypothesis.
1. Effect of root and litter resources on microorganisms in litter and
soil
In contrast to our first
hypothesis, root trenching more strongly affected microbial biomass and
respiration in litter than in soil suggesting that living roots of
tropical trees are supplying carbon predominantly to litter and not to
soil microorganisms. Conform to this pattern, root density, i.e., root
biomass per unit litter or soil, also was higher in litter than in soil.
Microorganisms in litter either may have directly benefitted from root
exudates or from mycorrhizal fungi using plant carbon to facilitate
associated microorganisms for capturing nutrients from decomposing
litter (Lang et al. 2021). As known from temperate forests, plant
roots may grow into the litter where the associated mycorrhizal fungi
participate in litter decomposition by exuding enzymes themselves, or by
stimulating the free-living associated community of saprotrophs (priming
effect; (Talbot et al. 2008; Zhou et al. 2020; Langet al. 2021). In contrast to our findings, root trenching in
temperate forests was associated with a decrease in microbial biomass
both in litter and in soil (Bluhm et al. 2019), and root-derived
resources have been shown to be responsible for about one half of soil
respiration (Hanson et al. 2000; Díaz-Pinés et al. 2010).
The lack of response of soil microbial biomass to root trenching in our
experiment indicates that the linkage between living roots and
free-living soil microorganisms in the tropics is weaker than in
temperate forest ecosystems. Probably, this is due to strongly weathered
soils in the tropics which are poor in nutrients (West et al.2010; Hartshorn 2013) as also the case at our study sites (Allenet al. 2016). High temperature accelerates weathering processes
and the often long history of tropical ecosystems results in soils
depleted in nutrients, especially in phosphorus (Stoops 2003; Camenzindet al. 2018). This likely makes root exudation inefficient for
acquiring nutrients from mineral soils via priming (Kuzyakov 2002). In
contrast to the nutrient-poor tropical soils, litter represents a
nutrient-rich substrate worth being exploited by investing carbon
resources via priming or by fostering nutrient exploitation by
mycorrhizal fungi.
Despite root trenching did not significantly alter microbial biomass and
respiration in mineral soil, it changed microbial community structure as
indicated by PLFAs patterns, which contrasts previous studies in
temperate forests where the deprivation of root-derived resources did
not affected microbial community structure (Hart & Sollins 1998; Bluhmet al. 2019). In our study, root trenching specifically decreased
the relative abundance of fungal and AMF biomarkers in mineral soil
suggesting that both saprotrophic and mycorrhizal fungi in soil
critically depend on plant roots in the tropics. This is conform to
recent findings that fungi benefit greatly from root-derived resources
(Lemanski & Scheu 2014; Birgander & Olsson 2021), however, this has
only been shown in temperate ecosystems. Notably, the effects of
trenching on AMF abundance were weak when litter was absent, which
indicates that soil AMF may not rely solely on nutrients originating
from soil, but also on those originating from litter. Overall, the
results point to the critical role of plant roots in supporting
saprotrophic and mycorrhizal fungi in soil, but also highlight their
reliance on litter resources.
In contrast to root trenching not affecting overall microbial biomass in
soil, root trenching resulted in a decline in animal abundances (meso-
and macrofauna) in soil by 30-40% as shown in our previous study based
on the same experiment (Zhou et al. 2023). This may indicate that
soil meso- and macrofauna predominantly rely on fungi (which declined
after trenching) and are unable to efficiently switch to bacteria as an
alternative food resource. Supporting this conclusion, soil
detritivorous microarthropods have been shown to predominantly consume
fungi in temperate forest ecosystems (Ferlian et al. 2015;
Pollierer & Scheu 2021). Generally, the rhizosphere is the hotspot of
microbial and animal activity in soil (Kuzyakov & Blagodatskaya 2015).
Animals are mobile, and therefore may generally benefit from
root-derived resources even though predominantly living in bulk soil
distant to roots. This contrasts unicellular microorganisms which may
only benefit from root-derived resources in close vicinity of roots. In
contrast to unicellular bacteria, saprotrophic, but in particular
mycorrhizal fungi may proliferate away from roots and thereby contribute
to spreading root-derived resources in space (Cardon & Whitbeck 2007;
Bonfante & Anca 2009). The strong response of animals in soil to root
trenching as found by Zhou et al. (2023) therefore likely reflects the
mobility of animals and potentially also the spread of root-derived
resources by fungi into bulk soil and litter.
In contrast to root trenching, litter removal neither significantly
affected soil microbial biomass nor microbial community structure, which
contrasts our second hypothesis. This resembles our previous results on
animals in soil which also remained unaffected by litter removal (Zhouet al. 2023). These results suggest that litter resources are
predominantly used locally and that the ‘litter’ energy channel is
isolated from energy channelling in soil, highlighting the
compartmentalization of carbon processing between litter and soil in
tropical ecosystems. However, previous studies from other tropical
region showed that in the long-term (9 years) litter removal may also
detrimentally affect soil microorganisms (Sheldrake et al. 2017).
2. Long-term vs. short-term effects on soil microorganisms
Contrasting our third hypothesis, exclusion of root- or litter-derived
resources little affected microbial basal respiration, microbial biomass
and only moderately affected microbial community structure in soil. By
contrast, most of the microbial parameters studied varied strongly with
land use and soil depth indicating that they are mainly driven by
factors acting in the long-term. This is conform to earlier studies
showing that microorganisms in soil are resistant to short-term
disturbances, such as changes in root resource input, but only respond
with a delay in time (Hart & Sollins 1998; Bluhm et al. 2019).
This ‘soil legacy effect’ on soil microbial properties has been observed
in a number of ecosystems including arable systems, grasslands and
forests (Dupouey et al. 2002; Eisenhauer et al. 2010;
Fichtner et al. 2014). Land-use history may even more strongly
impact soil microbial community composition than current aboveground
vegetation and soil properties (Jangid et al. 2011). Rubber and
oil palm plantations at our study sites were established about 20 years
before our experiment started in 2017. The establishment of the
plantations was associated by strong changes in physical and chemical
soil properties, such as pH and soil organic carbon content, and also
microclimatic changes (Drescher et al. 2016; Guillaume et
al. 2018). Such land-use changes strongly affect microbial communities
as documented previously (Brinkmann et al. 2019; Krashevskaet al. 2022). Similarly, the formation of soil depth gradients
across larger time scales has been shown to strongly change soil carbon
and nutrient concentrations, especially in the tropics (Guillaumeet al. 2015). Long-term exposure to changes in land use renders
microbial communities in tropical soil relatively stable, enhancing
their resistance to short-term changes in resource inputs. This
underscores the critical role of sustainable long-term land management
practices in promoting soil health and preserving microbial communities,
particularly in tropical regions.
Long-term and short-term effects on microorganisms can interact. Root
trenching had a greater impact on microbial biomass in oil palm
plantations compared to rainforest and rubber plantations, which
parallels the higher root density in litter in oil palm plantations than
in the other two land-use types. Both higher root density and higher
microbial biomass may be related to the comparatively high quality of
litter in oil palm plantations largely comprising litter of understory
vegetation, which is regularly eradicated by herbicide application,
whereas fronds of oil palm are piled up in rows, with the litter of
understory vegetation having lower lignin concentration than the litter
in rainforest and rubber plantations (Krashevska et al. 2018)
indicating higher decomposability (Thevenot et al. 2010; Talbot
& Treseder 2012). Similarly, trenching effects on soil fauna abundance
were also stronger in oil palm plantations (Zhou et al. 2023)
indicating that living roots are of particular importance for the entire
food web of oil palm plantations. Root trenching also reduced soil AMF
relative abundance, but only in rainforest and oil palm plantations and
not in rubber plantations. In rubber plantations the rubber trees are
tapped to collect latex, which likely decreases the supply of
assimilates to the roots and thus reduces root-derived resources (Nguyenet al. 2020). Although litter removal had no general effects on
microbial biomass and community structure, it did result in a reduction
in the relative abundance of bacteria in rainforest. Specifically, this
decrease was primarily attributed to Gram- bacteria,
which are known to heavily rely on simple carbon compounds derived from
plants (Fanin et al. 2019). Rainforests typically featured a
thicker litter layer compared to plantations and this may explain the
stronger impact on soil bacteria in the rainforest compared to
plantations. Overall, the findings suggest that the quality of litter,
root density and living roots are crucial factors that interact to
determine the response of microorganisms and soil fauna to environmental
perturbations in oil palm, rubber and rainforest ecosystems, whereas the
importance of these factors are overridden by long-term changes in
environmental factors such as changes in land use.
Conclusions
For the first time we documented the important role of root-derived
resources for litter and soil microorganisms across tropical land-use
systems. Our results showed stronger effects of root trenching on
microbial biomass and respiration in litter than in soil, indicating
that trees in the tropics predominantly allocate resources to roots for
mining for nutrients in litter rather than from organic matter in soil.
Little impact of litter removal on soil microorganisms suggests
independent carbon processing in litter and soil, pointing to the
vertical compartmentalisation of carbon cycling in tropical ecosystems.
The close linkage of plant roots and microorganisms in litter highlights
the importance of litter nutrients for plant nutrition, and positions
leaf litter as a crucial component in plant-soil feedbacks in the
tropics that is often overlooked. At the same time, long-term effects,
such as land use or soil depth, continuously alter the role of litter
and root resources and set limits on their impact on microbial community
structure and function.
Overall, our study sheds light on the driving forces for the structure
and functioning of microbial communities in tropical ecosystems, and
highlights the importance of root-derived resources for energy
channelling, carbon cycling and nutrient exploitation by trees. This
knowledge is crucial for understanding microbial processes in soil,
modelling carbon and nutrient dynamics in tropical ecosystems, and for
developing sustainable land-use systems in the tropics under global
change.
Acknowledgments
This study was funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG),
project number 192626868–SFB 990 in the framework of the collaborative
German-Indonesian research project CRC990/EFForTS. Z.Z is supported by
China Scholarship Council (CSC) (202004910314). A.P. acknowledges
support of the DFG Emmy Noether program (Projektnummer 493345801) and of
iDiv (DFG–FZT 118, 202548816). We gratefully acknowledge the Ministry
of Research and Technology of Indonesia (RISTEK), the Indonesian
Institute of Sciences (LIPI), the Ministry of Forestry (PHKA) and
Restoration Ecosystem Indonesia Harapan for the permits. We thank the
many colleagues and helpers for their support in the field and assistance
in the laboratory.
References
Allen, K., Corre, M.D., Kurniawan, S., Utami, S.R. & Veldkamp, E.
(2016). Spatial variability surpasses land-use change effects on soil
biochemical properties of converted lowland landscapes in Sumatra,
Indonesia. Geoderma , 284, 42–50.
Anderson, J.P.E. & Domsch, K.H. (1978). A physiological method for the
quantitative measurement of microbial biomass in soils. Soil
Biology and Biochemistry , 10, 215–221.
Angst, G., Mueller, K.E., Nierop, K.G.J. & Simpson, M.J. (2021). Plant-
or microbial-derived? A review on the molecular composition of
stabilized soil organic matter. Soil Biology and Biochemistry ,
156, 108189.
Baccini, A., Walker, W., Carvalho, L., Farina, M., Sulla-Menashe, D. &
Houghton, R.A. (2017). Tropical forests are a net carbon source based on
aboveground measurements of gain and loss. Science , 358,
230–234.
Bais, H.P., Weir, T.L., Perry, L.G., Gilroy, S. & Vivanco, J.M. (2006).
THE ROLE OF ROOT EXUDATES IN RHIZOSPHERE INTERACTIONS WITH PLANTS AND
OTHER ORGANISMS. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. , 57, 233–266.
Ballauff, J., Schneider, D., Edy, N., Irawan, B., Daniel, R. & Polle,
A. (2021). Shifts in root and soil chemistry drive the assembly of
belowground fungal communities in tropical land-use systems. Soil
Biology and Biochemistry , 154, 108140.
Bardgett, R.D. & Wardle, D.A. (2010). Aboveground-belowground
linkages: biotic interactions, ecosystem processes, and global change .
Oxford series in ecology and evolution. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B. & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting Linear
Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software ,
67, 1–48.
Beck, T., Joergensen, R.G., Kandeler, E., Makeschin, F., Nuss, E.,
Oberholzer, H.R., et al. (1997). An inter-laboratory comparison
of ten different ways of measuring soil microbial biomass C. Soil
Biology and Biochemistry , 29, 1023–1032.
Bever, J.D., Dickie, I.A., Facelli, E., Facelli, J.M., Klironomos, J.,
Moora, M., et al. (2010). Rooting theories of plant community
ecology in microbial interactions. Trends in Ecology &
Evolution , 25, 468–478.
Birgander, J. & Olsson, P.A. (2021). Temporal patterns of carbon flow
from grassland vegetation to soil microorganisms measured using
13C-labelling and signature fatty acids. Plant Soil , 462,
245–255.
Bissett, A., Richardson, A.E., Baker, G. & Thrall, P.H. (2011).
Long-term land use effects on soil microbial community structure and
function. Applied Soil Ecology , 51, 66–78.
Bluhm, S.L., Eitzinger, B., Ferlian, O., Bluhm, C., Schröter, K., Pena,
R., et al. (2019). Deprivation of root-derived resources affects
microbial biomass but not community structure in litter and soil.PLoS ONE , 14, e0214233.
Bonfante, P. & Anca, I.-A. (2009). Plants, Mycorrhizal Fungi, and
Bacteria: A Network of Interactions. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. , 63,
363–383.
Brinkmann, N., Schneider, D., Sahner, J., Ballauff, J., Edy, N., Barus,
H., et al. (2019). Intensive tropical land use massively shifts
soil fungal communities. Sci Rep , 9, 3403.
Bunn, R.A., Simpson, D.T., Bullington, L.S., Lekberg, Y. & Janos, D.P.
(2019). Revisiting the ‘direct mineral cycling’ hypothesis: arbuscular
mycorrhizal fungi colonize leaf litter, but why? ISME J , 13,
1891–1898.
Camenzind, T., Hättenschwiler, S., Treseder, K.K., Lehmann, A. &
Rillig, M.C. (2018). Nutrient limitation of soil microbial processes in
tropical forests. Ecol Monogr , 88, 4–21.
Cardon, Z.G. & Whitbeck, J.L. (Eds.). (2007). The rhizosphere: an
ecological perspective . Elsevier Academic Press, Amsterdam ; Boston.
Cebrian, J. (1999). Patterns in the Fate of Production in Plant
Communities. The American Naturalist , 154, 449–468.
Crowther, T.W., van den Hoogen, J., Wan, J., Mayes, M.A., Keiser, A.D.,
Mo, L., et al. (2019). The global soil community and its
influence on biogeochemistry. Science , 365, eaav0550.
Delgado-Baquerizo, M., Maestre, F.T., Reich, P.B., Jeffries, T.C.,
Gaitan, J.J., Encinar, D., et al. (2016). Microbial diversity
drives multifunctionality in terrestrial ecosystems. Nat Commun ,
7, 10541.
Díaz-Pinés, E., Schindlbacher, A., Pfeffer, M., Jandl, R.,
Zechmeister-Boltenstern, S. & Rubio, A. (2010). Root trenching: a
useful tool to estimate autotrophic soil respiration? A case study in an
Austrian mountain forest. Eur J Forest Res , 129, 101–109.
Drescher, J., Rembold, K., Allen, K., Beckschafer, P., Buchori, D.,
Clough, Y., et al. (2016). Ecological and socio-economic
functions across tropical land use systems after rainforest conversion.Philos T R Soc B , 371.
Dupouey, J.L., Dambrine, E., Laffite, J.D. & Moares, C. (2002).
IRREVERSIBLE IMPACT OF PAST LAND USE ON FOREST SOILS AND BIODIVERSITY.Ecology , 83, 2978–2984.
Eisenhauer, N., Beßler, H., Engels, C., Gleixner, G., Habekost, M.,
Milcu, A., et al. (2010). Plant diversity effects on soil
microorganisms support the singular hypothesis. Ecology , 91,
485–496.
Fanin, N., Kardol, P., Farrell, M., Nilsson, M.-C., Gundale, M.J. &
Wardle, D.A. (2019). The ratio of Gram-positive to Gram-negative
bacterial PLFA markers as an indicator of carbon availability in organic
soils. Soil Biology and Biochemistry , 128, 111–114.
Ferlian, O., Klarner, B., Langeneckert, A.E. & Scheu, S. (2015).
Trophic niche differentiation and utilisation of food resources in
collembolans based on complementary analyses of fatty acids and stable
isotopes. Soil Biology and Biochemistry , 82, 28–35.
Fernandez, C.W. & Kennedy, P.G. (2016). Revisiting the ‘Gadgil effect’:
do interguild fungal interactions control carbon cycling in forest
soils? New Phytol , 209, 1382–1394.
Fichtner, A., von Oheimb, G., Härdtle, W., Wilken, C. & Gutknecht,
J.L.M. (2014). Effects of anthropogenic disturbances on soil microbial
communities in oak forests persist for more than 100 years. Soil
Biology and Biochemistry , 70, 79–87.
Frostegård, Å., Tunlid, A. & Bååth, E. (1993). Phospholipid Fatty Acid
Composition, Biomass, and Activity of Microbial Communities from Two
Soil Types Experimentally Exposed to Different Heavy Metals. Appl
Environ Microbiol , 59, 3605–3617.
Grass, I., Kubitza, C., Krishna, V.V., Corre, M.D., Mußhoff, O., Pütz,
P., et al. (2020). Trade-offs between multifunctionality and
profit in tropical smallholder landscapes. Nat Commun , 11, 1186.
Guerra, C.A., Bardgett, R.D., Caon, L., Crowther, T.W.,
Delgado-Baquerizo, M., Montanarella, L., et al. (2021). Tracking,
targeting, and conserving soil biodiversity. Science , 371,
239–241.
Guillaume, T., Damris, M. & Kuzyakov, Y. (2015). Losses of soil carbon
by converting tropical forest to plantations: erosion and decomposition
estimated by δ 13 C. Glob Change Biol ,
21, 3548–3560.
Guillaume, T., Kotowska, M.M., Hertel, D., Knohl, A., Krashevska, V.,
Murtilaksono, K., et al. (2018). Carbon costs and benefits of
Indonesian rainforest conversion to plantations. Nat Commun , 9,
2388.
Haichar, F. el Z., Marol, C., Berge, O., Rangel-Castro, J.I., Prosser,
J.I., Balesdent, J., et al. (2008). Plant host habitat and root
exudates shape soil bacterial community structure. ISME J , 2,
1221–1230.
Hanson, P.J., Edwards, N.T., Garten, C.T. & Andrews, J.A. (2000).
Separating root and soil microbial contributions to soil respiration: A
review of methods and observations. Biogeochemistry , 48,
115–146.
Hart, S.C. & Sollins, P. (1998). Soil carbon and nitrogen pools and
processes in an old-growth conifer forest 13 years after trenching.Can. J. For. Res. , 28, 1261–1265.
Hartshorn, G.S. (2013). Tropical Forest Ecosystems. In:Encyclopedia of Biodiversity . Elsevier, pp. 269–276.
Hassani, M.A., Durán, P. & Hacquard, S. (2018). Microbial interactions
within the plant holobiont. Microbiome , 6, 58.
van der Heijden, M.G.A., Bardgett, R.D. & van Straalen, N.M. (2008).
The unseen majority: soil microbes as drivers of plant diversity and
productivity in terrestrial ecosystems. Ecol Letters , 11,
296–310.
Jangid, K., Williams, M.A., Franzluebbers, A.J., Schmidt, T.M., Coleman,
D.C. & Whitman, W.B. (2011). Land-use history has a stronger impact on
soil microbial community composition than aboveground vegetation and
soil properties. Soil Biology and Biochemistry , 43, 2184–2193.
Joergensen, R.G. (2022). Phospholipid fatty acids in soil—drawbacks
and future prospects. Biol Fertil Soils , 58, 1–6.
Krashevska, V., Klarner, B., Widyastuti, R., Maraun, M. & Scheu, S.
(2015). Impact of tropical lowland rainforest conversion into rubber and
oil palm plantations on soil microbial communities. Biol Fertil
Soils , 51, 697–705.
Krashevska, V., Malysheva, E., Klarner, B., Mazei, Y., Maraun, M.,
Widyastuti, R., et al. (2018). Micro-decomposer communities and
decomposition processes in tropical lowlands as affected by land use and
litter type. Oecologia , 187, 255–266.
Krashevska, V., Stiegler, C., June, T., Widyastuti, R., Knohl, A.,
Scheu, S., et al. (2022). Land‐use change shifts and magnifies
seasonal variations of the decomposer system in lowland tropical
landscapes. Ecology and Evolution , 12.
Kuzyakov, Y. (2002). Review: Factors affecting rhizosphere priming
effects. Z. Pflanzenernähr. Bodenk. , 165, 382–396.
Kuzyakov, Y. & Blagodatskaya, E. (2015). Microbial hotspots and hot
moments in soil: Concept & review. Soil Biology and
Biochemistry , 83, 184–199.
Lang, A.K., Jevon, F.V., Vietorisz, C.R., Ayres, M.P. & Hatala Matthes,
J. (2021). Fine roots and mycorrhizal fungi accelerate leaf litter
decomposition in a northern hardwood forest regardless of dominant tree
mycorrhizal associations. New Phytol , 230, 316–326.
Lauber, C.L., Ramirez, K.S., Aanderud, Z., Lennon, J. & Fierer, N.
(2013). Temporal variability in soil microbial communities across
land-use types. ISME J , 7, 1641–1650.
Laurance, W.F., Sayer, J. & Cassman, K.G. (2014). Agricultural
expansion and its impacts on tropical nature. Trends in Ecology &
Evolution , 29, 107–116.
Lemanski, K. & Scheu, S. (2014). Incorporation of 13C labelled glucose
into soil microorganisms of grassland: Effects of fertilizer addition
and plant functional group composition. Soil Biology and
Biochemistry , 69, 38–45.
Lenth, R.V. (2021). emmeans: Estimated Marginal Means, aka
Least-Squares Means .
Liang, C., Schimel, J.P. & Jastrow, J.D. (2017). The importance of
anabolism in microbial control over soil carbon storage. Nat
Microbiol , 2, 17105.
Malloch, D.W., Pirozynski, K.A. & Raven, P.H. (1980). Ecological and
evolutionary significance of mycorrhizal symbioses in vascular plants (A
Review). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. , 77, 2113–2118.
Margono, B.A., Turubanova, S., Zhuravleva, I., Potapov, P., Tyukavina,
A., Baccini, A., et al. (2012). Mapping and monitoring
deforestation and forest degradation in Sumatra (Indonesia) using
Landsat time series data sets from 1990 to 2010. Environ. Res.
Lett. , 7, 034010.
McBride, S.G., Choudoir, M., Fierer, N. & Strickland, M.S. (2020).
Volatile organic compounds from leaf litter decomposition alter soil
microbial communities and carbon dynamics. Ecology , 101.
Mendiburu, F. de. (2020). agricolae: Statistical Procedures for
Agricultural Research .
Mitchard, E.T.A. (2018). The tropical forest carbon cycle and climate
change. Nature , 559, 527–534.
Nguyen, T.T., Do, T.T., Harper, R., Pham, T.T., Linh, T.V.K., Le, T.S.,et al. (2020). Soil Health Impacts of Rubber Farming: The
Implication of Conversion of Degraded Natural Forests into Monoculture
Plantations. Agriculture , 10, 357.
Oksanen, J., Blanchet, F.G., Friendly, M., Kindt, R., Legendre, P.,
McGlinn, D., et al. (2020). vegan: Community Ecology
Package .
Orwin, K.H., Dickie, I.A., Holdaway, R. & Wood, J.R. (2018). A
comparison of the ability of PLFA and 16S rRNA gene metabarcoding to
resolve soil community change and predict ecosystem functions.Soil Biology and Biochemistry , 117, 27–35.
Paterson, E., Gebbing, T., Abel, C., Sim, A. & Telfer, G. (2007).
Rhizodeposition shapes rhizosphere microbial community structure in
organic soil. New Phytologist , 173, 600–610.
Pinheiro, J., Bates, D., & R Core Team. (2022). nlme: Linear and
Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models .
Pollierer, M.M. & Scheu, S. (2021). Stable isotopes of amino acids
indicate that soil decomposer microarthropods predominantly feed on
saprotrophic fungi. Ecosphere , 12.
Potapov, A., Klarner, B., Sandmann, D., Widyastuti, R. & Scheu, S.
(2019). Linking size spectrum, energy flux and trophic
multifunctionality in soil food webs of tropical land‐use systems.J Anim Ecol , 88, 1845–1859.
R Core Team. (2020). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical
Computing . R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
Rembold, K., Mangopo, H., Tjitrosoedirdjo, S.S. & Kreft, H. (2017).
Plant diversity, forest dependency, and alien plant invasions in
tropical agricultural landscapes. Biological Conservation , 213,
234–242.
Scheu, S. (1992). Automated measurement of the respiratory response of
soil microcompartments: Active microbial biomass in earthworm faeces.Soil Biology and Biochemistry , 24, 1113–1118.
Schimel, D.S. (1995). Terrestrial ecosystems and the carbon cycle.Global Change Biol , 1, 77–91.
Schlatter, D.C., Bakker, M.G., Bradeen, J.M. & Kinkel, L.L. (2015).
Plant community richness and microbial interactions structure bacterial
communities in soil. Ecology , 96, 134–142.
Schneider, D., Engelhaupt, M., Allen, K., Kurniawan, S., Krashevska, V.,
Heinemann, M., et al. (2015). Impact of Lowland Rainforest
Transformation on Diversity and Composition of Soil Prokaryotic
Communities in Sumatra (Indonesia). Front. Microbiol. , 6, 1339.
Sheldrake, M., Rosenstock, N.P., Revillini, D., Olsson, P.A., Mangan,
S., Sayer, E.J., et al. (2017). Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal
community composition is altered by long‐term litter removal but not
litter addition in a lowland tropical forest. New Phytol , 214,
455–467.
Stoops, G. (2003). Evolution of tropical soil science: past and
future . Académie royale des sciences d’outre-mer, Brussels.
Talbot, J.M., Allison, S.D. & Treseder, K.K. (2008). Decomposers in
disguise: mycorrhizal fungi as regulators of soil C dynamics in
ecosystems under global change. Functional Ecology , 22, 955–963.
Talbot, J.M. & Treseder, K.K. (2012). Interactions among lignin,
cellulose, and nitrogen drive litter chemistry–decay relationships.Ecology , 93, 345–354.
Thevenot, M., Dignac, M.-F. & Rumpel, C. (2010). Fate of lignins in
soils: A review. Soil Biology and Biochemistry , 42, 1200–1211.
Veldkamp, E., Schmidt, M., Powers, J.S. & Corre, M.D. (2020).
Deforestation and reforestation impacts on soils in the tropics.Nat Rev Earth Environ , 1, 590–605.
Warton, D.I. & Hui, F.K.C. (2011). The arcsine is asinine: the analysis
of proportions in ecology. Ecology , 92, 3–10.
West, P.C., Gibbs, H.K., Monfreda, C., Wagner, J., Barford, C.C.,
Carpenter, S.R., et al. (2010). Trading carbon for food: Global
comparison of carbon stocks vs. crop yields on agricultural land.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. , 107, 19645–19648.
Wickham, H. (2016). ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis .
Springer-Verlag New York.
Xu, J., Liu, S., Song, S., Guo, H., Tang, J., Yong, J.W.H., et
al. (2018). Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi influence decomposition and
the associated soil microbial community under different soil phosphorus
availability. Soil Biology and Biochemistry , 120, 181–190.
Zhou, J., Zang, H., Loeppmann, S., Gube, M., Kuzyakov, Y. & Pausch, J.
(2020). Arbuscular mycorrhiza enhances rhizodeposition and reduces the
rhizosphere priming effect on the decomposition of soil organic matter.Soil Biology and Biochemistry , 140, 107641.
Zhou, Z., Krashevska, V., Widyastuti, R., Scheu, S. & Potapov, A.
(2022). Tropical land use alters functional diversity of soil food webs
and leads to monopolization of the detrital energy channel.eLife , 11, e75428.
Zhou, Z., Lu, J., Preiser, J., Widyastuti, R., Scheu, S. & Potapov, A.
(2023). Plant roots fuel tropical soil animal communities. Ecology
Letters , ele.14191.
Figure legends
Fig 1. Experimental design. The experiment was established at
12 sites, four sites in each land-use type (rainforest, rubber and oil
palm plantations). Four treatments/experimental plots were established
per site: control (C), root trenching, litter removal, and combined
treatment. Samples were separated into leaf litter layer and soil layer
with two depth, i.e., 0-5 cm and 5-10 cm. We measured microbial biomass,
respiration, and phospholipid fatty acid (PLFA) profiles.
Fig. 2. Wald test results of linear mixed-effects models on the
effect of litter removal (NoLitter), root trenching (NoRoot) and
land-use types (LU) on the microbial indicators in the litter and soil
layers (24 models in total). The present of bubble indicate significant
effects and bubble sizes represent the F-value of the corresponding
factor effects. For the detail of modelling results see Table S1.
Fig 3. The effect sizes of litter removal (NoLitter) and root
trenching (NoRoot) on basal respiration (μg O2g-1 h-1), microbial biomass
(Cmic; μg Cmic g-1)
and total PLFAs (nmol g-1) amount in three layers:
litter, 0-5 and 5-10 cm soil depth (a, upper panel), and cross-treatment
average values ± standard errors of these parameters per land-use type
(LU) in three layers (b, lower panel). Effect sizes are given as back
transformed log response ratios (percent changes). Asterisks in the
panel a indicate significant effects, with (*) p < 0.1,
* p < 0.05. X-axes in the panel b are square-rooted.
Fig 4. Non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) of microbial
community structure (PLFAs) in three land-use types in litter layer (a),
soil layer with 0-5 cm soil depth (b), and soil layer with 5-10 cm soil
depth (c), with and without living roots (Root: control + litter
removal; NoRoot: trenching + litter removal and trenching). Positions of
the treatments represent centroids (n = 8). The variation of microbial
community structure with land-use types (rainforest - green, rubber -
orange and oil palm - yellow) and soil depth (0-5 cm: solid-line
ellipse; 5-10 cm: dash-line ellipse) across experimental treatments (d).
Fig 5. The effect sizes of litter removal (Litter-) and root
trenching (Root-) on the relative abundance of arbuscular mycorrhiza
fungi (AMF), bacterial PLFA in three layers across land-use types (a,
upper panel), and cross-treatment average values ± standard errors of
these parameters per land use system in three layers: litter, 0-5 and
5-0 cm soil depth (b, lower panel). Effect sizes are given as back
transformed logit response ratios (percent changes). Asterisks in the
panel a indicate significant effects, with (*) p < 0.1,
* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 and
***p < 0.001.
Appendix legends
Appendix 1. The methodology for calculating microbial markers
and indicators by PLFAs
Figure S1. Correlations between PLFA and NLFA 16:1ω5 in the
same studied sites.
Figure S2. Effect sizes of land use (a, upper panel) and soil
depth (b, lower panel) on basal respiration (μg O2g-1 h-1), microbial biomass
(Cmic; μg Cmic g-1)
and total PLFAs (nmol g-1) amount across treatments.
Effect sizes are given as back transformed log response ratios.
Asterisks in the panel a indicate significant effects, with (*) p< 0.1, * p < 0.05, ** p <
0.01 and ***p < 0.001.
Figure S3. Root density (amount of dry fine roots per kilogram
of dry substrates; g/kg) in the litter and soil layer of each land-use
type. Bars sharing the same letter within each pane are not
significantly different (Tukey’s HSD test following ANOVA, p
> 0.05).
Table S1. Type III ANOVA table of F- and p-values of linear
mixed-effects models on the effect of root trenching and land-use type
(rainforest, rubber and oil palm plantations) on each microbial
parameter in litter layer, with site as random effects; and root
trenching, litter removal, land-use type, soil depth (0-5 and 5-10 cm)
and soil moisture (both 0-5 cm and 5-10 cm) on each microbial parameter
in soil layer, with treatment nested within site as random factor; num
DF, numerator degrees of freedom; den DF, denominator degrees of
freedom. Asterisks denote significance levels: * p <
0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001.
Table S2. Effect sizes of root trenching and litter removal on
basal respiration (μg O2 g-1h-1), microbial biomass (Cmic; μg
Cmic g-1) and total PLFAs (nmol
g-1) in each layer across land-use types. Asterisks
denote significance levels: * p < 0.05; ** p< 0.01; *** p < 0.001.
Table S3. Effect sizes of root trenching and litter removal on
PLFA indicators in each layer across land-use types. Asterisks denote
significance levels: * p < 0.05; ** p< 0.01; *** p < 0.001.
Table S4. Effect sizes of soil depth (the ratio between 5-10 cm
and 0-5 cm) on basal respiration, microbial biomass and total PLFAs in
each and across land-use type. Asterisks denote significance levels: *p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p< 0.001.
Table S5. Effect sizes of land use (the ratio between oil palm
plantation vs rainforest, rubber plantation vs rainforest
and oil palm plantation vs rubber plantation) on basal
respiration, microbial biomass and total PLFAs in litter and soil layer.
Asterisks denote significance levels: * p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001.
Table S6. Effect sizes of soil depth (the ratio between soil
layer vs litter layer) on root density in each land-use type.