Michal Paret

and 4 more

Background. Beta-lactam allergy (BLA) labels are common in pediatric patients, but are often inaccurate, leading to unnecessary use of second line antibiotics. While direct oral challenge tests (OCTs) are effective for de-labeling, their incorporation in pediatric inpatient setting remains underexplored. This study aimed to assess the feasibility of implementing an inpatient pediatric BLA de-labeling program. Methods. A prospective study conducted in a pediatric ward involved inpatients undergoing a 2-step graded OCT. In-house pediatricians completed surveys to assess beliefs and barriers regarding inpatient OCT implementation. Follow-up included caregiver surveys and review of hospital and Health Maintenance Organization (HMO) electronic medical records (EMRs). Results. Of 192 eligible BLA-labeled patients, 32 (16.6%) were recruited, 93.8% carrying an amoxicillin allergy label and the vast majority without other drug allergy labels. All patients had a history of a mild reaction, 100% presented with a benign rash. 30/32 (93.4%) had a negative OCT. Pediatricians faced challenges such as workload pressures, staff shortages and overestimation of severe reaction risks, all serving as barriers for patient recruitment. At follow-up (median 37 months), 35.7% of caregivers reported de-labeling, while EMRs documented higher rates (HMO: 80%l; hospital: 70%). Despite successful OCTs, gaps in caregiver understanding and pediatrician support persisted. Conclusions. While direct OCTs are proved to be effective in de-labeling BLA, significant challenges persist in implementing inpatient de-labeling and ensuring their long-term success. These include low recruitment rates, pediatricians’ misconceptions and incomplete integration into EMRs. Addressing these barriers requires targeted education, improved communication and streamlined processes to improve de-labeling outcomes and support antibiotic stewardship.
Background. Oral immunotherapy (OIT) is an emerging method for treating food allergy in children. However, data regarding adults undergoing this process is lacking. Methods. We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of patients with food allergy aged ≥17 years who completed OIT treatment between April 2010 to December 2020 at Shamir medical Center. Data was compared to that of children aged 4 to <11 years and adolescents aged ≥11 to 17 treated during the same time period. Results. A total of 96 adults at a median age of 22.3 years who underwent OIT for milk (n=53), peanut (n=18), sesame (n=7), egg (n=5) and tree nuts (n=13) were analyzed and compared to 1299 children and 309 adolescents. Adults experienced more adverse reactions requiring injectable epinephrine, both during in-clinic up-dosing (49% vs. 15.9% and 26.5% for children and adolescents respectively, p<0.0001) and during home treatment (22.9% vs. 10.5%, p=0.001 for children, and 14.2%, p=0.06 for adolescents). Most adults (61.5%) were fully desensitized, but rates of full desensitization were significantly lower compared to children (73.4%, p=0.013). Significantly more adults (28.3%) undergoing milk OIT failed treatment compared to children (14.3%, p=0.015) and adolescents (14.1%, p=0.022), while failure rates in adults undergoing OIT for other foods were low (9.3%) and comparable to children and adolescents. Conclusions. OIT is successful in desensitizing most adults with IgE-mediated food allergy. Adults undergoing milk OIT are at increased risk for severe reactions and for OIT failure while failure rates in adults undergoing OIT for other foods are low.