Clinical outcomes of conventional HDR intracavitary
brachytherapy combined with complementary applicator-guided intensity
modulated radiotherapy boost in patients with bulky cervical tumor
S Lua,
b,*,
S-B Wangc,*, RY. Kimd,
J-Y Zhangc, X-L
Wanga, W-D Wanga,b, Guiquan
Zhua,b, J Zhoua, Y
Tanc, M-Y Tana, M-L
Lie, G Yina,b, J
Lia,b, M Fenga,b, J-Y
Langa,b
a Department of radiation oncology, Sichuan Cancer
Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, School of Medicine,
University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, Chinab Radiation Oncology Key Laboratory of Sichuan
Province, Chengdu, China c School of Medicine,
University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, Chinad Department of Radiation Oncology, University of
Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, U.S.A eDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich,
Munich, Germany
Corresponding Author: J-Y Lang, Department of radiation oncology,
Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, School of
Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China,
Chengdu, China; Radiation Oncology Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province,
Chengdu, China. E-mail:
langjy610@163.com
* Co-first authors: Shun Lu and Shu-Bin Wang contributed
equally to this work.Abstract:
Objective To investigate the clinical outcomes and toxicity in
patients with locally advanced cervical cancer treated with
supplementary applicator guided-intensity modulated radiation therapy
(IMRT) based on conventional intracavitary brachytherapy (IC/IMRT).
Design A retrospective cohort study.
Setting Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer
Center, China.
Population Large high risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV)
volume (>40cc) at the time of brachytherapy cervical cancer
patients were recruited.
Methods This study is a retrospective analysis of 76 patients
with locally advanced cervical cancer (FIGO IIB-IVA) treated with
concurrent chemo-radiotherapy followed by IC/IMRT between June 2010 and
October 2016. External radiotherapy (45 Gy in 25 fractions) with
cisplatin chemotherapy treated before IC/IMRT. The prescription dose for
HR-CTV and IR-CTV were 6 Gy and 5 Gy per fraction for 5 fractions
respectively.
Results: Mean HR-CTV was 65.8±23.6 cc at the time of
brachytherapy. D90 for HR-CTV and IR-CTV were 88.7±3.6 Gy and 78.1±2.5
Gy. D2cc for bladder, rectum, sigmoid and small intestine were 71.8±3.8
Gy, 64.6±4.9 Gy, 63.9±5.3 Gy and 56.7±8.7 Gy respectively. Median
follow-up was 85 months (47.9-124.2 months). Five-year local recurrence
free survival rate, metastasis recurrence free survival rate, disease
free survival rate and cancer special survival rate were 87.6%, 82.4%,
70.9% and 76.3%, respectively. The grade 1+2 gastrointestinal and
urinary late toxicities were 15.8% and 21.1%, while grade 3 late
toxicities were 3.9% and 5.2%, respectively. Neither acute nor late
grade 4 gastrointestinal or urinary toxicities were seen.
Conclusions: The combination of ICBT with an applicator-guided
supplementary IMRT boost achieved an excellent local control and overall
survival with low toxicity for bulky residual cervical tumor.
Key words : Cervical cancer; applicator-guided IMRT boost;
intracavitary brachytherapy; survival; toxicity
Tweetable abstract Applicator guided-intensity modulated
radiation therapy (IMRT) based on conventional intracavitary
brachytherapy (IC/IMRT) technologies showed the excellent local control
and low morbidities in locally advanced cervical cancer that
cannot be satisfied by intracavitary brachytherapy.