REFERENCES
1. Zhao DF, Seco M, Wu JJ, et al. Mechanical Versus Bioprosthetic Aortic
Valve Replacement in Middle-Aged Adults: A Systematic Review and
Meta-Analysis. Ann Thorac Surg . 2016;102(1):315-327.
doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.10.092
2. Doenst T, Essa Y, Jacoub K, et al. Cardiac surgery 2016 reviewed.Clin Res Cardiol . 2017;106(11):851-867.
doi:10.1007/s00392-017-1113-2
3. Otto CM, Nishimura RA, Bonow RO, et al. 2020 ACC/AHA Guideline for
the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: A Report of the
American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint
Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation .
2021;143(5):E72-E227. doi:10.1161/CIR.0000000000000923
4. Hickey GL, Grant SW, Bridgewater B, et al. A comparison of outcomes
between bovine pericardial and porcine valves in 38 040 patients in
England and Wales over 10 years. Eur J Cardio-Thoracic Surg .
2015;47(6):1067-1074. doi:10.1093/EJCTS/EZU307
5. Kilic A, Sultan I, Navid F, et al. Trifecta Aortic Bioprosthesis:
Midterm Results in 1,953 Patients From a Single Center. Ann Thorac
Surg . 2019;107(5):1356-1362. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.10.063
6. Persson M, Glaser N, Franco-Cereceda A, Nilsson J, Holzmann MJ,
Sartipy U. Porcine vs Bovine Bioprosthetic Aortic Valves: Long-Term
Clinical Results. Ann Thorac Surg . 2021;111(2):529-535.
doi:10.1016/J.ATHORACSUR.2020.05.126
7. Austin PC. An Introduction to Propensity Score Methods for Reducing
the Effects of Confounding in Observational Studies. Multivariate
Behav Res . 2011;46(3):399. doi:10.1080/00273171.2011.568786
8. Grunkemeier GL, Furnary AP, Wu Y, Wang L, Starr A. Durability of
pericardial versus porcine bioprosthetic heart valves. J Thorac
Cardiovasc Surg . 2012;144(6):1381-1386. doi:10.1016/J.JTCVS.2012.08.060
9. Suri RM, Zehr KJ, Sundt TM, et al. Left Ventricular Mass Regression
After Porcine Versus Bovine Aortic Valve Replacement: A Randomized
Comparison. Ann Thorac Surg . 2009;88(4):1232-1237.
doi:10.1016/J.ATHORACSUR.2009.04.128
10. Eichinger WB, Botzenhardt F, Guenzinger R, et al. The effective
orifice area/patient aortic annulus area ratio: A better way to compare
different bioprostheses? A prospective randomized comparison of the
mosaic and perimount bioprostheses in the aortic position. In:Journal of Heart Valve Disease . Vol 13. ; 2004:382-389.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15222284/. Accessed May 28, 2022.
11. Chan V, Kulik A, Tran A, et al. Long-term clinical and hemodynamic
performance of the hancock II versus the perimount aortic bioprostheses.Circulation . 2010;122(11 SUPPL. 1).
doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.928085
12. Ganapathi AM, Englum BR, Keenan JE, et al. Long-Term Survival After
Bovine Pericardial Versus Porcine Stented Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve
Replacement: Does Valve Choice Matter? Ann Thorac Surg .
2015;100(2):550-559. doi:10.1016/J.ATHORACSUR.2015.02.067
13. Glaser N, Jackson V, Franco-Cereceda A, Sartipy U. Survival after
Aortic Valve Replacement with Bovine or Porcine Valve Prostheses: A
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg .
2019;67(4):282-290. doi:10.1055/S-0038-1649513
14. Wernly B, Zappe AK, Unbehaun A, et al. Transcatheter valve-in-valve
implantation (VinV-TAVR) for failed surgical aortic bioprosthetic
valves. Clin Res Cardiol . 2019;108(1):83-92.
doi:10.1007/s00392-018-1326-z
15. Bové T, Van Belleghem Y, François K, Caes F, Van Overbeke H, Van
Nooten G. Stentless and stented aortic valve replacement in elderly
patients: factors affecting midterm clinical and hemodynamical outcome.Eur J Cardio-thoracic Surg . 2006;30(5):706-713.
doi:10.1016/j.ejcts.2006.07.017
16. Aranda-Michel E, Bianco V, Dufendach K, et al. Midterm outcomes of
subcoronary stentless porcine valve versus stented aortic valve
replacement. J Card Surg . 2020;35(11):2950-2956.
doi:10.1111/jocs.14943
17. Bianco V, Kilic A, Gleason TG, et al. Aortic root replacement with
stentless xenografts in patients with aortic stenosis. J Thorac
Cardiovasc Surg . 2019;158(4):1021-1027. doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.11.028
18. Brown JA, Serna-Gallegos D, Kilic A, et al. Midterm Outcomes of
Stented Versus Stentless Bioprosthetic Valves After Aortic Root
Replacement. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg . 2021.
doi:10.1053/j.semtcvs.2021.09.003
19. Narang S, Satsangi DK, Banerjee A, Geelani MA. Stentless valves
versus stented bioprostheses at the aortic position: Midterm results.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg . 2008;136(4):943-947.
doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2008.06.016
20. Harky A, Wong CHM, Hof A, et al. Stented versus Stentless Aortic
Valve Replacement in Patients with Small Aortic Root: A Systematic
Review and Meta-Analysis. Innov Technol Tech Cardiothorac Vasc
Surg . 2018;13(6):404-416. doi:10.1097/IMI.0000000000000569
21. Duncan A, Moat N, Simonato M, et al. Outcomes Following
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for Degenerative Stentless Versus
Stented Bioprostheses. JACC Cardiovasc Interv .
2019;12(13):1256-1263. doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2019.02.036