loading page

Density dependence shapes life-history trade-offs in a food-limited population
  • +3
  • Harman Jaggi,
  • Wenyun Zuo,
  • Rosemarie Kentie,
  • Jean-Michel Gaillard,
  • Tim Coulson,
  • Shripad Tuljapurkar
Harman Jaggi
Stanford University

Corresponding Author:harman6@stanford.edu

Author Profile
Wenyun Zuo
Stanford University
Author Profile
Rosemarie Kentie
Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research
Author Profile
Jean-Michel Gaillard
UMR-CNRS 5558
Author Profile
Tim Coulson
Oxford University
Author Profile
Shripad Tuljapurkar
Stanford University
Author Profile

Abstract

Quantifying trade-offs within populations is important in life-history theory. However, most studies focusing on life-history trade-offs focus on two traits and assume trade-offs to be static. Our work provides a framework for understanding covariation among multiple traits and how population density influences the traits. Using detailed individual-based data for Soay sheep, we find density strongly shapes life-history trade-offs and distribution of lifetime reproductive success (LRS). At low density, a trade-off between juvenile survival and growth structures life-history variation whereas at equilibrium density (K), trade-off between reproduction and juvenile survival is the major structuring axes. Contrary to Lomnicki’s prediction, we find the distribution of LRS is highly constrained at K, with mothers of adult sizes contributing the most to reproduction. Our results offer insights into how high density limits diversity of individual life-histories, advance an understanding of dynamic nature of trade-offs and have implications for evolution via density-dependent selection.
Submitted to Ecology Letters
Submission Checks Completed
Assigned to Editor
Reviewer(s) Assigned
05 Jul 2024Reviewer(s) Assigned
20 Aug 2024Review(s) Completed, Editorial Evaluation Pending
21 Aug 2024Editorial Decision: Revise Minor
28 Aug 2024Review(s) Completed, Editorial Evaluation Pending
28 Aug 20241st Revision Received
30 Aug 2024Submission Checks Completed
30 Aug 2024Assigned to Editor
30 Aug 2024Reviewer(s) Assigned
02 Sep 2024Editorial Decision: Revise Minor
03 Sep 20242nd Revision Received
03 Sep 2024Review(s) Completed, Editorial Evaluation Pending
04 Sep 2024Submission Checks Completed
04 Sep 2024Assigned to Editor
04 Sep 2024Reviewer(s) Assigned
09 Sep 2024Editorial Decision: Revise Minor
13 Sep 20243rd Revision Received
13 Sep 2024Review(s) Completed, Editorial Evaluation Pending
13 Sep 2024Submission Checks Completed
13 Sep 2024Assigned to Editor
13 Sep 2024Reviewer(s) Assigned
13 Sep 2024Editorial Decision: Accept