Joseph Najem

and 22 more

Introduction The 2020 Protection of Students with Life-Threatening Allergies Act, obligates schools across Alberta, Canada to hold a common use stock of at least one epinephrine autoinjector (EAI) and to maintain a protocol for the prevention and management of anaphylaxis Herein, we assessed the effectiveness of this policy by comparing pre-hospital EAI use before and after implementation of the act. Methods The Cross-Canada Anaphylaxis Registry (C-CARE) enrolls patients presenting to a participating emergency department with anaphylaxis defined as the involvement of ≥2 systems and/or hypotension. Specific to this project, we extracted data on pediatric patients recruited from the Stollery Children’s Hospital in Edmonton, Alberta from 2016-2024. Data were collected on demographics, comorbidities, symptomatology, pre- and intra-hospital management, and outcome of anaphylaxis by standardized chart review. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess pre-hospital EAI use for cases occurring at school before versus after the enactment of the Act on January 1, 2020. Evaluating pre-hospital EAI use in Quebec and Ontario and antihistamine use pre versus post act in Alberta were used as negative controls. Result Of the 59 cases of in-school anaphylaxis identified over the study period, 52.5% occurred post-Act. The median age was 13.0 years (IQR=9.5-15.8) and 40.7% were male. EAI use in schools was greater post-act versus pre-act (64.5% versus 35.7%, aOR=3.82, 95%CI=1.24-11.7). There was no difference in pre-hospital EAI use pre versus post 2020 in Quebec and Ontario, that did not use the act (aOR=0.72, 95%CI=0.31-1.70). There was no difference in pre-hospital antihistamine use pre versus post act (aOR=0.31, 95%CI=0.07-1.41). Conclusion Implementation of the provincial policy was associated with an increase in pre-hospital EAI use in cases of pediatric anaphylaxis occurring at school. These preliminary results support the effectiveness of policy interventions for anaphylaxis management.
Background/Rationale Weekly cholecalciferol can be an alternative to daily supplementation to reduce pill burden in patients with complex medication regimens and hypovitaminosis D, but evidence supporting this switch is unclear. Objective We aimed to determine whether weekly cholecalciferol was superior to daily cholecalciferol to replete patients with hypovitaminosis D. Methods We conducted a systematic review of randomized controlled trials involving participants with baseline hypovitaminosis D (<30ng/ml) comparing weekly versus daily cholecalciferol dosing and where serum cholecalciferol was measured within 90 days of starting treatment. We searched MEDLINE, CINAHL and EMBASE from inception to May 7 th, 2024. A random-effects meta-analysis evaluated the odds ratio for repletion of serum Vitamin D levels. Findings Eight trials involving 542 patients were included in the analysis. Weekly D3 and daily cholecalciferol were not significantly different in correcting hypovitaminosis D (OR=1.5, 95% CI = 0.3-6.9, p=0.6, favoring weekly dosing, I 2=85.3%). A sensitivity analysis excluding otherwise healthy patients had similar findings (OR=0.8, 95% CI=0.3–2.1, p=0.6). Most studies were judged to be at risk of bias, the different doses being compared increased the heterogeneity (I 2=85.3%). Conclusions There is limited direct evidence supporting a switch from daily to weekly cholecalciferol dosing; however, weekly supplementation was not demonstrably worse at repleting levels and decreases a patient’s daily pill burden.

Connor Prosty

and 9 more

Connor Prosty

and 9 more

Background Cold urticaria (coldU) is associated with substantial morbidity and risk of fatality. Data on coldU in children are sparse. We aimed to evaluate the clinical characteristics, management, risk of associated anaphylaxis, and resolution rate of coldU in a pediatric cohort. Additionally, we sought to compare these metrics to children with chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU). Methods We prospectively enrolled children with coldU from 2013-2021 in a cohort study at the Montreal Children’s Hospital and an affiliated allergy clinic. Data for comparison with participants with solely CSU were extracted from a previous study. Data on demographics, comorbidities, severity of presentation, management, and laboratory values were collected at study entry. Patients were contacted yearly to assess for resolution. Results Fifty-two children with cold urticaria were recruited, 51.9% were female and the median age of symptom onset was 9.5 years. Most patients were managed with second generation H1-antihistamines (sgAHs). Well-controlled disease on sgAHs was negatively associated with concomitant CSU (adjusted odds ratio (aOR)=0.69 [95%CI: 0.53, 0.92]). Elevated eosinophils were associated with cold-induced anaphylaxis (coldA) (aOR=1.38 [95%CI: 1.04, 1.83]), which occurred in 17.3% of patients. The resolution rate of coldU was 4.8 per 100 patient-years, which was lower than that of CSU (adjusted hazard ratio=0.43 [95%CI: 0.21, 0.89], P<10-2). Conclusion Pediatric coldU bears a substantial risk of anaphylaxis and a low resolution rate. Absolute eosinophil count and co-existing CSU may be useful predictive factors.