loading page

A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS TO ASSESS THE SIGNIFICANCE OF MICROBIAL INFECTIONS IN ZEBRA
  • +1
  • Carlo Andrea Cossu,
  • Raksha Vasantrai Bhoora,
  • Rudi Cassini,
  • Henriette van Heerden
Carlo Andrea Cossu
University of Pretoria Faculty of Veterinary Science

Corresponding Author:ca.cossu@tuks.co.za

Author Profile
Raksha Vasantrai Bhoora
University of Pretoria Faculty of Veterinary Science
Author Profile
Rudi Cassini
University of Padova Faculty of Veterinary Medicine Department of Animal Medicine Production and Health Legnaro Padova Italy
Author Profile
Henriette van Heerden
University of Pretoria Faculty of Veterinary Science
Author Profile

Abstract

Wild equids can harvest multiple-host infectious agents that are able to affect other wildlife species, but also domestic animals and humans. The contact between wild and domestic equids is constantly increasing due to the depletion of natural areas, climate and land-usage changes, which could result in burdensome epidemics. Nevertheless, currently there is a lack of adequate epidemiological data from zebra. Three electronic databases were searched from 10 to 20 March 2021 for publications reporting bacterial, viral and protozoan infections in zebra. Data for a total of 12 nominal variables were extracted from reviewed papers to undergo a qualitative analysis on microbial infections in zebra. Prevalence-reporting studies were subjected to meta-analysis for estimating the pooled prevalence and seroprevalence of infectious agents in wild zebra populations. We identified 29 pathogen species and the most represented were Equine Herpesvirus 1 and 9, Bacillus anthracis, African Horse Sickness virus and Theileria equi. They were reported from all the three zebra species, both in captivity and wilderness. Pooled seroprevalences were estimated for the equine Orbiviruses AHSV (70%; 95%CI: 35-96%) and EEV (21%; 95%CI: 8-38%) and for the equine α -Herpesviruses EHV-1 (72%; 95%CI: 43-93%), EHV-4 (40%; 95%CI: 0-100%) and EHV-9 (58%; 95%CI: 9-98%), and pooled prevalences for the equine piroplasms T. equi (100%; 95%CI: 94-100%) and B. caballi (8%; 95%CI: 0-28%). Zebra is most probably a reservoir from which AHSV, EHV-1 and T. equi can be transmitted to horse populations, potentially causing disastrous epidemics. Zebra can also harvest zoonotic pathogens like B. anthracis, A. phagocytophylum, CCHFV and T. brucei. Other agents like EHV-9, BPV-1 and BPV-2 have the potential to spread from zebra to other wild endangered animal species. We conclude that zebra is an important host for multiple and dangerous pathogens. Alert and epidemiological research should be increased on infectious agents of zebra.