Over the last few years cardiac changed radically and so has the average age of the heart disease population progressively increased. Mitral valve surgery has a significant margin for progress in conservative vs replacement strategy. Mitral disease due to insufficiency in the elderly population has historically suffered from lower repair rates but deficiency alone should not limit repair operations in a specialized environment ensuring good survival.

A larger use of mitral valve repair is recommended in case of mitral regurgitation. Anterior leaflet repair is generally more difficult than posterior. Presence of atrial fibrillation or dysfunction of left ventricle appears to be independent preoperative factors of failure in case of involvement of the anterior leaflet. In experienced hands anterior leaflet repair can be effective and safe and should theoretically not limit a conservative technique instead of a replacement. This would therefore lead to being more aggressive in the treatment of this pathological condition in the earlier stages of the disease.

Infections and pandemics will condition us in an increasingly predominant way regarding diagnostic, medical and surgical activities in all specialist areas; and this particularly in cardiovascular one. Nevertheless in the future the need to cohabit with pandemic events and to be able to continue an elective and not only emergency cardiac surgery program represents an imperative.

Background and aim Papillary fibroelastoma (PFE) represents only 16% of the benign cardiac tumor and approximately 15% of these are located on tricuspid valve. Materials and Methods Over a period of 22 years (1999-2021) we observed 75 pts with cardiac tumors at our Center over 9650 pts operated on. Most of them were mixoma but in 10 cases histology showed a PFE. We describe a rare case (1/75 of cardiac tumors) of a tricuspid valve PFE in a 69-year-old patient. Trans-thoracic echocardiography demonstrated a mobile mass (20 x 10 mm), adhering to the atrial side of the septal leaflet of the tricuspid valve. In consideration of the mobility of the mass and the consequent high embolic risk, surgical removal was made. Patient underwent surgery through a median sternotomy on CPBP. A “gelatinous” mass adhering to the tricuspid leaflet was found and completely removed. The postoperative course was uneventful. The pathological evaluation confirmed the diagnosis of PFE. Conclusions PFE of the tricuspid valve is rare entities being in most cases found incidentally. In our experience the incidence of this tumor in this location is 1/10000 cases of cardiac surgery. Although most patients are asymptomatic, surgical treatment is nevertheless recommended in consideration of the high embolic risk.