References
1. El-Hamamy E, Arulkumaran S. Poor progress of labour. Current Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2005 2005/02/01/;15(1):1-8.
2. Rosenbloom JI, Stout MJ, Tuuli MG, Woolfolk CL, López JD, Macones GA, et al. New labor management guidelines and changes in cesarean delivery patterns. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 2017/12/01/;217(6):689.e1-.e8.
3. Caughey AB, Cahill AG, Guise J-M, Rouse DJ. Safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 2014/03/01/;210(3):179-93.
4. Charoenboon C, Srisupundit K, Tongsong T. Rise in cesarean section rate over a 20-year period in a public sector hospital in northern Thailand. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2013 Jan;287(1):47-52.
5. Maharaj D. Assessing cephalopelvic disproportion: back to the basics. Obstetrical & gynecological survey. 2010 Jun;65(6):387-95.
6. Morgan MA, Thurnau GR, Fishburne JI, Jr. The fetal-pelvic index as an indicator of fetal-pelvic disproportion: a preliminary report. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1986 Sep;155(3):608-13.
7. Lenhard M, Johnson T, Weckbach S, Nikolaou K, Friese K, Hasbargen U. Three-dimensional pelvimetry by computed tomography. La radiologia medica. 2009 2009/06/23;114(5):827.
8. Stark DD, McCarthy SM, Filly RA, Parer JT, Hricak H, Callen PW. Pelvimetry by magnetic resonance imaging. AJR American journal of roentgenology. 1985 May;144(5):947-50.
9. Prayer D, Malinger G, Brugger PC, Cassady C, De Catte L, De Keersmaecker B, et al. ISUOG Practice Guidelines: performance of fetal magnetic resonance imaging. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017 May;49(5):671-80.
10. Malin GL, Bugg GJ, Takwoingi Y, Thornton JG, Jones NW. Antenatal magnetic resonance imaging versus ultrasound for predicting neonatal macrosomia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG. 2016 Jan;123(1):77-88.
11. Spong CY, Berghella V, Wenstrom KD, Mercer BM, Saade GR. Preventing the First Cesarean Delivery: Summary of a Joint: Eunice Kennedy Shriver: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Workshop. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2012;120(5).
12. Napolitano R, Dhami J, Ohuma EO, Ioannou C, Conde-Agudelo A, Kennedy SH, et al. Pregnancy dating by fetal crown-rump length: a systematic review of charts. BJOG. 2014 Apr;121(5):556-65.
13. Heffner LJ, Elkin E, Fretts RC. Impact of labor induction, gestational age, and maternal age on cesarean delivery rates. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2003 2003/08/01/;102(2):287-93.
14. Rossi RM, Requarth E, Warshak CR, Dufendach KR, Hall ES, DeFranco EA. Risk Calculator to Predict Cesarean Delivery Among Women Undergoing Induction of Labor. Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Mar;135(3):559-68.
15. Zaretsky MV, Alexander JM, McIntire DD, Hatab MR, Twickler DM, Leveno KJ. Magnetic resonance imaging pelvimetry and the prediction of labor dystocia. Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Nov;106(5 Pt 1):919-26.
16. Kim Y, Margonis GA, Prescott JD, Tran TB, Postlewait LM, Maithel SK, et al. Nomograms to Predict Recurrence-Free and Overall Survival After Curative Resection of Adrenocortical Carcinoma. JAMA surgery. 2016 Apr;151(4):365-73.
17. Harrell FE, Jr., Lee KL, Mark DB. Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors. Statistics in medicine. 1996 Feb 28;15(4):361-87.
18. Vickers AJ, Cronin AM. Traditional statistical methods for evaluating prediction models are uninformative as to clinical value: towards a decision analytic framework. Seminars in oncology. 2010 Feb;37(1):31-8.
19. Franz M, von Bismarck A, Delius M, Ertl-Wagner B, Deppe C, Mahner S, et al. MR pelvimetry: prognosis for successful vaginal delivery in patients with suspected fetopelvic disproportion or breech presentation at term. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017 Feb;295(2):351-9.
20. Joyce DN, Giwa-Osagie F, Stevenson GW. Role of pelvimetry in active management of labour. British medical journal. 1975 Nov 29;4(5995):505-7.
21. Spörri S, Hänggi W, Braghetti A, Vock P, Schneider H. Pelvimetry by magnetic resonance imaging as a diagnostic tool to evaluate dystocia. Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Jun;89(6):902-8.
22. Lilford RJ, van Coeverden de Groot HA, Moore PJ, Bingham P. The relative risks of caesarean section (intrapartum and elective) and vaginal delivery: a detailed analysis to exclude the effects of medical disorders and other acute pre-existing physiological disturbances. British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology. 1990 Oct;97(10):883-92.
23. Macones GA, Chang JJ, Stamilio DM, Odibo AO, Wang J, Cahill AG. Prediction of cesarean delivery using the fetal-pelvic index. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Nov;209(5):431.e1-8.
24. Ferguson JE, 2nd, Newberry YG, DeAngelis GA, Finnerty JJ, Agarwal S, Turkheimer E. The fetal-pelvic index has minimal utility in predicting fetal-pelvic disproportion. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998 Nov;179(5):1186-92.
25. Burke N, Burke G, Breathnach F, McAuliffe F, Morrison J, Turner M, et al. Prediction of cesarean delivery in the term nulliparous woman: results from the prospective, multicenter Genesis study. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2017;216(6):598.e1-.e11.
26. Smith G, Dellens M, White I, Pell J. Combined logistic and Bayesian modeling of cesarean section risk. American journal of obstetrics gynecology. 2004;191(6):2029-34.
27. Al Housseini A, Newman T, Cox A, Devoe LD. Prediction of risk for cesarean delivery in term nulliparas: a comparison of neural network and multiple logistic regression models. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009 2009/07/01/;201(1):113.e1-.e6.
28. Sims CJ, Meyn L, Caruana R, Rao RB, Mitchell T, Krohn M. Predicting cesarean delivery with decision tree models. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000 2000/11/01/;183(5):1198-206.
29. Costantine MM, Fox K, Byers BD, Mateus J, Ghulmiyyah LM, Blackwell S, et al. Validation of the prediction model for success of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Nov;114(5):1029-33.
30. van Loon AJ, Mantingh A, Serlier EK, Kroon G, Mooyaart EL, Huisjes HJ. Randomised controlled trial of magnetic-resonance pelvimetry in breech presentation at term. Lancet. 1997 Dec 20-27;350(9094):1799-804.
31. Fox L, Huerta-Enochian G, Hamlin J, Katz V, gynecology. The magnetic resonance imaging-based fetal-pelvic index: a pilot study in the community hospital. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2004;190(6):1679-85; discussion 85-8.
32. Mengert WF. Estimation of pelvic capacity. Journal of the American Medical Association. 1948 Sep 18;138(3):169-74.
33. Li YG, Chen CL, Liao KD, Yu YH, Xu YK, Wang Y, et al. Study on the cephalopelvic relationship with cephalic presentation in nulliparous full-term Chinese pregnant women by MRI with three-dimensional reconstruction. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2018 Aug;298(2):433-41.
34. Zaretsky M, Reichel T, McIntire D, Twickler D, gynecology. Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging to ultrasound in the estimation of birth weight at term. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2003;189(4):1017-20.