Metatranscriptomics provides closer diversity and composition estimates
with morphology than PCR-based methods: a zooplankton mock community
case study
Abstract
Studying complex metazoan communities requires taxonomic expertise and
laborious work if done using the traditional morphological approach.
Nowadays, the popular use of molecular-based methods accompanied by
massively parallel sequencing (MPS) provides rapid and higher resolution
diversity analyses. However, diversity estimates derived from the
molecular-based approach can be biased by the co-detection of
environmental DNA (eDNA), pseudogene contamination, and PCR
amplification biases. Here, we constructed microcrustacean zooplankton
mock communities to compare species diversity and composition estimates
from PCR-based methods using genomic (gDNA) and complementary DNA
(cDNA), metatranscriptomic transcripts, and morphology data. Mock
community analyses show that gDNA mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase I
(mtCOI) amplicons inflate species richness due to environmental and
nontarget species sequence contamination. Significantly higher amplicon
sequence variant (ASV) and nucleotide diversity in gDNA amplicons than
cDNA indicated the presence of putative pseudogenes. Last, PCR-based
methods failed to detect the most abundant species in mock communities
due to priming site mismatch. Overall, metatranscriptomic transcripts
provided estimates of species richness and composition that closely
resembled morphological data. The use of metatranscriptomic transcripts
was further tested in field samples. The results showed that it could
provide consistent species diversity estimates among biological and
technical replicates while allowing monitoring of the zooplankton
temporal species composition changes using different mitochondrial
markers. These findings show that community characterization based on
metatranscriptomic transcripts reflects the actual community more than
PCR-based approaches.