CONTRIBUTION OF AUTHORS
Danilo Euclides Fernandes: data collection, analysis, and discussion,
manuscript preparation and approval of the final version of the
manuscript.
Gianna Mastroianni Kirsztajn: data analysis and discussion, manuscript
preparation and approval of the final version of the manuscript.
Katia de Almeida: Project coordination, data analysis and discussion,
manuscript preparation and approval of the final version of the
manuscript.
References
1. Uhlmann RF, Larson EB, Rees TS, Koepsell TD, Duckert LG. Relationship
of hearing impairment to dementia and cognitive dysfunction in older
adults. JAMA. 1989 ; 261(13):1916–1919.
2. Lin FR. Hearing loss and cognition among older adults in the United
States. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2011 ; 66(10):1131–1136.
3. Lin FR, Yaffe K, Xia J, et al. Hearing loss and cognitive decline in
older adults. JAMA Intern Med. 2013 ; 173(4):293–299.
4. Lin FR, Albert M. Hearing loss and dementia - who is listening? Aging
Ment Health. 2014 ; 18(6):671–673.
5. Peelle JE, Troiani V, Grossman M, Wingfield A. Hearing loss in older
adults affects neural systems supporting speech comprehension. J
Neurosci Off J Soc Neurosci. 2011 ; 31(35):12638–12643.
6. Ataollahi Eshkoor S, Mun CY, Ng CK, Hamid TA. Mild cognitive
impairment and its management in older people. Clin Interv Aging.2015 ; :687.
7. Alzheimer’s Association. 2015 Alzheimer’s disease facts and figures.
Alzheimers Dement. 2015 ; 11(3):332–384.
8. Frankish H, Horton R. Prevention and management of dementia: a
priority for public health. The Lancet. 2017 ;
390(10113):2614–2615.
9. Goman AM, Lin FR. Prevalence of Hearing Loss by Severity in the
United States. Am J Public Health. 2016 ; 106(10):1820–1822.
10. Livingston G, Sommerlad A, Orgeta V, et al. Dementia prevention,
intervention, and care. The Lancet. 2017 ;
390(10113):2673–2734.
11. Gatehouse S, Naylor G, Elberling C. Benefits from hearing aids in
relation to the interaction between the user and the environment. Int J
Audiol. 2003 ; 42 Suppl 1:S77-85.
12. Foo C, Rudner M, Rönnberg J, Lunner T. Recognition of speech in
noise with new hearing instrument compression release settings requires
explicit cognitive storage and processing capacity. J Am Acad Audiol.2007 ; 18(7):618–631.
13. Souza PE, Arehart KH, Kates JM, Croghan NBH, Gehani N. Exploring the
limits of frequency lowering. J Speech Lang Hear Res JSLHR.2013 ; 56(5):1349–1363.
14. Ellis RJ, Munro KJ. Does cognitive function predict frequency
compressed speech recognition in listeners with normal hearing and
normal cognition? Int J Audiol. 2013 ; 52(1):14–22.
15. Ng EHN, Rudner M, Lunner T, Pedersen MS, Rönnberg J. Effects of
noise and working memory capacity on memory processing of speech for
hearing-aid users. Int J Audiol. 2013 ; 52(7):433–441.
16. Neher T, Grimm G, Hohmann V, Kollmeier B. Do hearing loss and
cognitive function modulate benefit from different binaural
noise-reduction settings? Ear Hear. 2014 ; 35(3):e52-62.
17. Desjardins JL, Doherty KA. The effect of hearing aid noise reduction
on listening effort in hearing-impaired adults. Ear Hear. 2014 ;
35(6):600–610.
18. Neher T. Relating hearing loss and executive functions to hearing
aid users’ preference for, and speech recognition with, different
combinations of binaural noise reduction and microphone directionality.
Front Neurosci. 2014 ; 8:391.
19. Ng EHN, Rudner M, Lunner T, Rönnberg J. Noise reduction improves
memory for target language speech in competing native but not foreign
language speech. Ear Hear. 2015 ; 36(1):82–91.
20. Seol HY, Park S, Ji YS, Hong SH, Moon IJ. Impact of hearing aid
noise reduction algorithms on the speech-evoked auditory brainstem
response. Sci Rep. 2020 ; 10(1):10773.
21. Johnson JA, Xu J, Cox RM. Impact of Hearing Aid Technology on
Outcomes in Daily Life II: Speech Understanding and Listening Effort.
Ear Hear. 2016 ; 37(5):529–540.
22. Wu Y-H, Stangl E, Chipara O, Hasan SS, DeVries S, Oleson J. Efficacy
and Effectiveness of Advanced Hearing Aid Directional and Noise
Reduction Technologies for Older Adults With Mild to Moderate Hearing
Loss: Ear Hear. 2019 ; 40(4):805–822.
23. Cox RM, Johnson JA, Xu J. Impact of Hearing Aid Technology on
Outcomes in Daily Life I: The Patients’ Perspective. Ear Hear.2016 ; 37(4):e224–e237.
24. Popelka GR. Hearing aids: basic and applied. New York, NY: Springer
Science+Business Media; 2016.
25. Dillon H. Hearing aids. 2. ed. Sydney: Boomerang Press [u.a.];
2012.
26. Metz MJ, editor. Sandlin’s textbook of hearing aid amplification:
technical and clinical considerations. Third edition. San Diego, CA:
Plural Publishing; 2014.
27. Moher D, Hopewell S, Schulz KF, et al. CONSORT 2010 explanation and
elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised
trials. Int J Surg Lond Engl. 2012 ; 10(1):28–55.
28. Medical University of Graz. Randomizer [Internet]. [cited 2015
Jan 14]. Available from: http://www.randomizer.at/
29. Nasreddine ZS, Phillips NA, Bédirian V, et al. The Montreal
Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive
impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005 ; 53(4):695–699.
30. Apolinario D, Dos Santos MF, Sassaki E, et al. Normative data for
the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and the Memory Index Score
(MoCA-MIS) in Brazil: Adjusting the nonlinear effects of education with
fractional polynomials. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2018 ;
33(7):893–899.
31. Dupuis K, Pichora-Fuller MK, Chasteen AL, Marchuk V, Singh G, Smith
SL. Effects of hearing and vision impairments on the Montreal Cognitive
Assessment. Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn.2015 ; 22(4):413–437.
32. Fonseca R, Salles J, Parente M. NEUPSILIN - Instrumento de avaliação
neuropsicológica breve (Brief Neuropsychological Assessment Instrument).
São Paulo: Vetor; 2009.
33. Fonseca RP, Salles JF de, Parente MA de MP. Development and content
validity of the Brazilian Brief Neuropsychological Assessment Battery
Neupsilin. Psychol Amp Neurosci. Pontificia Universidade Católica do Rio
de Janeiro; 2008 ; 1(1):55–62.
34. Durante AS, Wieselberg MB, Carvalho S, et al. Cortical Auditory
Evoked Potential: evaluation of speech detection in adult hearing aid
users. CoDAS. Sociedade Brasileira de Fonoaudiologia; 2014 ;
26(5):367–373.
35. Cox RM, Alexander GC, Beyer CM. Norms for the international outcome
inventory for hearing aids. J Am Acad Audiol. 2003 ;
14(8):403–413.
36. Ribeiro UASL, Souza VC, Lemos SMA. Quality of life and social
determinants in individual hearing AIDS users. CoDAS. 2019 ;
31(2):e20170287.
37. Mukadam N, Sommerlad A, Huntley J, Livingston G. Population
attributable fractions for risk factors for dementia in low-income and
middle-income countries: an analysis using cross-sectional survey data.
Lancet Glob Health. 2019 ; 7(5):e596–e603.
38. Cho YS, Park SY, Seol HY, et al. Clinical Performance Evaluation of
a Personal Sound Amplification Product vs a Basic Hearing Aid and a
Premium Hearing Aid. JAMA Otolaryngol Neck Surg. American Medical
Association; 2019 ; 145(6):516–522.
39. Moore DR, Edmondson-Jones M, Dawes P, et al. Relation between
speech-in-noise threshold, hearing loss and cognition from 40-69 years
of age. PloS One. 2014 ; 9(9):e107720.
FIGURES