CONTRIBUTION OF AUTHORS
Danilo Euclides Fernandes: data collection, analysis, and discussion, manuscript preparation and approval of the final version of the manuscript.
Gianna Mastroianni Kirsztajn: data analysis and discussion, manuscript preparation and approval of the final version of the manuscript.
Katia de Almeida: Project coordination, data analysis and discussion, manuscript preparation and approval of the final version of the manuscript.
References
1. Uhlmann RF, Larson EB, Rees TS, Koepsell TD, Duckert LG. Relationship of hearing impairment to dementia and cognitive dysfunction in older adults. JAMA. 1989 ; 261(13):1916–1919.
2. Lin FR. Hearing loss and cognition among older adults in the United States. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2011 ; 66(10):1131–1136.
3. Lin FR, Yaffe K, Xia J, et al. Hearing loss and cognitive decline in older adults. JAMA Intern Med. 2013 ; 173(4):293–299.
4. Lin FR, Albert M. Hearing loss and dementia - who is listening? Aging Ment Health. 2014 ; 18(6):671–673.
5. Peelle JE, Troiani V, Grossman M, Wingfield A. Hearing loss in older adults affects neural systems supporting speech comprehension. J Neurosci Off J Soc Neurosci. 2011 ; 31(35):12638–12643.
6. Ataollahi Eshkoor S, Mun CY, Ng CK, Hamid TA. Mild cognitive impairment and its management in older people. Clin Interv Aging.2015 ; :687.
7. Alzheimer’s Association. 2015 Alzheimer’s disease facts and figures. Alzheimers Dement. 2015 ; 11(3):332–384.
8. Frankish H, Horton R. Prevention and management of dementia: a priority for public health. The Lancet. 2017 ; 390(10113):2614–2615.
9. Goman AM, Lin FR. Prevalence of Hearing Loss by Severity in the United States. Am J Public Health. 2016 ; 106(10):1820–1822.
10. Livingston G, Sommerlad A, Orgeta V, et al. Dementia prevention, intervention, and care. The Lancet. 2017 ; 390(10113):2673–2734.
11. Gatehouse S, Naylor G, Elberling C. Benefits from hearing aids in relation to the interaction between the user and the environment. Int J Audiol. 2003 ; 42 Suppl 1:S77-85.
12. Foo C, Rudner M, Rönnberg J, Lunner T. Recognition of speech in noise with new hearing instrument compression release settings requires explicit cognitive storage and processing capacity. J Am Acad Audiol.2007 ; 18(7):618–631.
13. Souza PE, Arehart KH, Kates JM, Croghan NBH, Gehani N. Exploring the limits of frequency lowering. J Speech Lang Hear Res JSLHR.2013 ; 56(5):1349–1363.
14. Ellis RJ, Munro KJ. Does cognitive function predict frequency compressed speech recognition in listeners with normal hearing and normal cognition? Int J Audiol. 2013 ; 52(1):14–22.
15. Ng EHN, Rudner M, Lunner T, Pedersen MS, Rönnberg J. Effects of noise and working memory capacity on memory processing of speech for hearing-aid users. Int J Audiol. 2013 ; 52(7):433–441.
16. Neher T, Grimm G, Hohmann V, Kollmeier B. Do hearing loss and cognitive function modulate benefit from different binaural noise-reduction settings? Ear Hear. 2014 ; 35(3):e52-62.
17. Desjardins JL, Doherty KA. The effect of hearing aid noise reduction on listening effort in hearing-impaired adults. Ear Hear. 2014 ; 35(6):600–610.
18. Neher T. Relating hearing loss and executive functions to hearing aid users’ preference for, and speech recognition with, different combinations of binaural noise reduction and microphone directionality. Front Neurosci. 2014 ; 8:391.
19. Ng EHN, Rudner M, Lunner T, Rönnberg J. Noise reduction improves memory for target language speech in competing native but not foreign language speech. Ear Hear. 2015 ; 36(1):82–91.
20. Seol HY, Park S, Ji YS, Hong SH, Moon IJ. Impact of hearing aid noise reduction algorithms on the speech-evoked auditory brainstem response. Sci Rep. 2020 ; 10(1):10773.
21. Johnson JA, Xu J, Cox RM. Impact of Hearing Aid Technology on Outcomes in Daily Life II: Speech Understanding and Listening Effort. Ear Hear. 2016 ; 37(5):529–540.
22. Wu Y-H, Stangl E, Chipara O, Hasan SS, DeVries S, Oleson J. Efficacy and Effectiveness of Advanced Hearing Aid Directional and Noise Reduction Technologies for Older Adults With Mild to Moderate Hearing Loss: Ear Hear. 2019 ; 40(4):805–822.
23. Cox RM, Johnson JA, Xu J. Impact of Hearing Aid Technology on Outcomes in Daily Life I: The Patients’ Perspective. Ear Hear.2016 ; 37(4):e224–e237.
24. Popelka GR. Hearing aids: basic and applied. New York, NY: Springer Science+Business Media; 2016.
25. Dillon H. Hearing aids. 2. ed. Sydney: Boomerang Press [u.a.]; 2012.
26. Metz MJ, editor. Sandlin’s textbook of hearing aid amplification: technical and clinical considerations. Third edition. San Diego, CA: Plural Publishing; 2014.
27. Moher D, Hopewell S, Schulz KF, et al. CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Int J Surg Lond Engl. 2012 ; 10(1):28–55.
28. Medical University of Graz. Randomizer [Internet]. [cited 2015 Jan 14]. Available from: http://www.randomizer.at/
29. Nasreddine ZS, Phillips NA, Bédirian V, et al. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005 ; 53(4):695–699.
30. Apolinario D, Dos Santos MF, Sassaki E, et al. Normative data for the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and the Memory Index Score (MoCA-MIS) in Brazil: Adjusting the nonlinear effects of education with fractional polynomials. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2018 ; 33(7):893–899.
31. Dupuis K, Pichora-Fuller MK, Chasteen AL, Marchuk V, Singh G, Smith SL. Effects of hearing and vision impairments on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment. Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn.2015 ; 22(4):413–437.
32. Fonseca R, Salles J, Parente M. NEUPSILIN - Instrumento de avaliação neuropsicológica breve (Brief Neuropsychological Assessment Instrument). São Paulo: Vetor; 2009.
33. Fonseca RP, Salles JF de, Parente MA de MP. Development and content validity of the Brazilian Brief Neuropsychological Assessment Battery Neupsilin. Psychol Amp Neurosci. Pontificia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro; 2008 ; 1(1):55–62.
34. Durante AS, Wieselberg MB, Carvalho S, et al. Cortical Auditory Evoked Potential: evaluation of speech detection in adult hearing aid users. CoDAS. Sociedade Brasileira de Fonoaudiologia; 2014 ; 26(5):367–373.
35. Cox RM, Alexander GC, Beyer CM. Norms for the international outcome inventory for hearing aids. J Am Acad Audiol. 2003 ; 14(8):403–413.
36. Ribeiro UASL, Souza VC, Lemos SMA. Quality of life and social determinants in individual hearing AIDS users. CoDAS. 2019 ; 31(2):e20170287.
37. Mukadam N, Sommerlad A, Huntley J, Livingston G. Population attributable fractions for risk factors for dementia in low-income and middle-income countries: an analysis using cross-sectional survey data. Lancet Glob Health. 2019 ; 7(5):e596–e603.
38. Cho YS, Park SY, Seol HY, et al. Clinical Performance Evaluation of a Personal Sound Amplification Product vs a Basic Hearing Aid and a Premium Hearing Aid. JAMA Otolaryngol Neck Surg. American Medical Association; 2019 ; 145(6):516–522.
39. Moore DR, Edmondson-Jones M, Dawes P, et al. Relation between speech-in-noise threshold, hearing loss and cognition from 40-69 years of age. PloS One. 2014 ; 9(9):e107720.
FIGURES