loading page

Integrating the bright and dark sides of aquatic resource subsidies -- a synthesis
  • +13
  • Cornelia Twining,
  • Andreu Blanco,
  • Christopher Dutton,
  • Eric Harvey,
  • Martin Kainz,
  • Carmen Kowarik,
  • Johanna Kraus,
  • Dominik Martin-Creuzburg,
  • Tarn Preet Parmar,
  • N Razavi,
  • Nicole Richoux,
  • Gregoire Saboret,
  • Charlie Sarran,
  • Travis Schmidt,
  • Jeremy Shipley,
  • Amanda L. Subalusky
Cornelia Twining
Eawag

Corresponding Author:cornelia.twining@gmail.com

Author Profile
Andreu Blanco
University of Vigo
Author Profile
Christopher Dutton
University of Florida
Author Profile
Eric Harvey
Universite du Quebec a Trois-Rivieres
Author Profile
Martin Kainz
WasserCluster Lunz
Author Profile
Carmen Kowarik
Eawag
Author Profile
Johanna Kraus
US Geological Survey
Author Profile
Dominik Martin-Creuzburg
Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus-Senftenberg
Author Profile
Tarn Preet Parmar
Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus-Senftenberg
Author Profile
N Razavi
SUNY-ESF
Author Profile
Nicole Richoux
Rhodes University
Author Profile
Gregoire Saboret
Eawag
Author Profile
Charlie Sarran
University of Quebec at Trois-Rivieres
Author Profile
Travis Schmidt
US Geological Survey
Author Profile
Jeremy Shipley
Swiss Federal Institute for Forest Snow and Landscape Research WSL
Author Profile
Amanda L. Subalusky
University of Florida
Author Profile

Abstract

Aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems are linked through the reciprocal exchange of materials and organisms. Aquatic-to-terrestrial subsidies are relatively low quantity in most terrestrial ecosystems, but they can provide high contents of limiting resources that increase consumer fitness and ecosystem production. However, they also may carry significant contaminant loads, particularly in anthropogenically-impacted watersheds. Global change processes, including land use change, climate change, and biodiversity declines, are altering the quantity and quality of aquatic subsidies, potentially shifting the balance of costs and benefits of aquatic subsidies for terrestrial consumers. Many global change processes interact and impact both the bright and dark sides of aquatic subsidies simultaneously, highlighting the need for future integrative research that bridges ecosystem as well as disciplinary boundaries. We identify key research priorities, including increased quantification of the spatiotemporal variability in aquatic subsidies across a range of ecosystems, greater understanding of the landscape-scale extent of aquatic subsidy impact, and deeper exploration of the relative costs and benefits of aquatic subsidies for consumers.