References
1. Verma A, Jiang CY, Betts TR, et al. Approaches to catheter ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation.N Engl J Med. 2015;372(19):1812-1822.
2. Miyazaki S, Taniguchi H, Kusa S, et al. Five-year follow-up outcome after catheter ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation using a sequential biatrial linear defragmentation approach: What does atrial fibrillation termination during the procedure imply? Heart Rhythm. 2017;14(1):34-40.
3. Kirzner JM, Raelson CA, Liu CF, et al. Effects of focal impulse and rotor modulation-guided ablation on atrial arrhythmia termination and inducibility: Impact on outcomes after treatment of persistent atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2019;30(12):2773-2781.
4. Kochhauser S, Jiang CY, Betts TR, et al. Impact of acute atrial fibrillation termination and prolongation of atrial fibrillation cycle length on the outcome of ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation: A substudy of the STAR AF II trial.Heart Rhythm. 2017;14(4):476-483.
5. Chauhan VS, Verma A, Nayyar S, et al. Focal source and trigger mapping in atrial fibrillation: Randomized controlled trial evaluating a novel adjunctive ablation strategy.Heart Rhythm. 2020;17(5 Pt A):683-691.
6. Zahid S, Cochet H, Boyle PM, et al. Patient-derived models link re-entrant driver localization in atrial fibrillation to fibrosis spatial pattern. Cardiovasc Res.2016;110(3):443-454.
7. Boyle PM, Zghaib T, Zahid S, et al. Computationally guided personalized targeted ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation. Nat Biomed Eng. 2019;3(11):870-879.
8. Akita T, Kiuchi K, Fukuzawa K, et al. Lesion distribution after cryoballoon ablation and hotballoon ablation: Late-gadolinium enhancement magnetic resonance imaging analysis. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2019;30(10):1830-1840.
9. Kurose J, Kiuchi K, Fukuzawa K, et al. Lesion characteristics between cryoballoon ablation and radiofrequency ablation with a contact-force sensing catheter: late-gadolinium enhancement magnetic resonance imaging assessment.J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2020.
10. Ranjan R, Kato R, Zviman MM, et al. Gaps in the ablation line as a potential cause of recovery from electrical isolation and their visualization using MRI. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2011;4(3):279-286.
11. Kircher S, Arya A, Altmann D, et al. Individually tailored vs. standardized substrate modification during radiofrequency catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: a randomized study. Europace. 2018;20(11):1766-1775.
12. Ohe M, Haraguchi G, Kumanomido J, et al. New tailored approach using a revised assessment of fragmented potentials for persistent atrial fibrillation: Early area defragmentation by modified CFAE module. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2019;30(6):844-853.
13. Sakata K, Okuyama Y, Ozawa T, et al. Not all rotors, effective ablation targets for nonparoxysmal atrial fibrillation, are included in areas suggested by conventional indirect indicators of atrial fibrillation drivers: ExTRa Mapping project.J Arrhythm. 2018;34(2):176-184.
14. McGann C, Akoum N, Patel A, et al. Atrial fibrillation ablation outcome is predicted by left atrial remodeling on MRI. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2014;7(1):23-30.
15. Higuchi K, Cates J, Gardner G, et al. The Spatial Distribution of Late Gadolinium Enhancement of Left Atrial Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2018;4(1):49-58.
16. Rolf S, Kircher S, Arya A, et al. Tailored atrial substrate modification based on low-voltage areas in catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2014;7(5):825-833.
17. Chen J, Arentz T, Cochet H, et al. Extent and spatial distribution of left atrial arrhythmogenic sites, late gadolinium enhancement at magnetic resonance imaging, and low-voltage areas in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation: comparison of imaging vs. electrical parameters of fibrosis and arrhythmogenesis. Europace. 2019;21(10):1484-1493.
18. Verma A, Sanders P, Champagne J, et al. Selective complex fractionated atrial electrograms targeting for atrial fibrillation study (SELECT AF): a multicenter, randomized trial.Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2014;7(1):55-62.
19. Lim HS, Hocini M, Dubois R, et al. Complexity and Distribution of Drivers in Relation to Duration of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2017;69(10):1257-1269.
20. Cochet H, Dubois R, Yamashita S, et al. Relationship Between Fibrosis Detected on Late Gadolinium-Enhanced Cardiac Magnetic Resonance and Re-Entrant Activity Assessed With Electrocardiographic Imaging in Human Persistent Atrial Fibrillation. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2018;4(1):17-29.
21. Nakamura T, Kiuchi K, Fukuzawa K, et al. Successful modulation of atrial fibrillation drivers anchoring to fibrotic tissue after box isolation using an online real-time phase mapping system: ExTRa Mapping. J Arrhythm. 2019;35(5):733-736.
22. Fukumoto K, Habibi M, Ipek EG, et al. Association of Left Atrial Local Conduction Velocity With Late Gadolinium Enhancement on Cardiac Magnetic Resonance in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol.2016;9(3):e002897.
23. Ali RL, Hakim JB, Boyle PM, et al. Arrhythmogenic propensity of the fibrotic substrate after atrial fibrillation ablation: a longitudinal study using magnetic resonance imaging-based atrial models. Cardiovasc Res.2019;115(12):1757-1765.