loading page

ULP (urethral ligament plication) and midurethral sling: identical anatomical pathways for cure of stress incontinence
  • +1
  • Peter Petros,
  • Akin Ahmet Sivaslioglu,
  • Ray Hodgson,
  • Paulo Palma
Peter Petros
Pelvic Reconstructive Surgeon (Retired

Corresponding Author:pp@kvinno.com

Author Profile
Akin Ahmet Sivaslioglu
Izmir University of Economics Medicalpoint International Hospital
Author Profile
Ray Hodgson
University of New South Wales Port Macquarie Campus
Author Profile
Paulo Palma
University of Campinas
Author Profile

Abstract

The ULP (urethral ligament plication) operation for stress urinary incontinence is based on the same anatomical etiopathogenesis as the midurethral sling (MUS): restoring collagen to weakened PULs (pubourethral ligaments), albeit, by plication with collagenopoietic wide-bore polyester sutures to prevent PUL elongation under stress. Calculated collagenopoietic sufficiency of polyester sutures came from a doctoral thesis where collagen strength from a rejected polyester graft was tested. Precise placements of the single polyester suture to PUL were based on a live anatomical study. 12-month cure rate was 83% (learning curve included), with no post-operative urinary retention, due to absence of suburethral tapes.
22 Oct 2024Submitted to BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
24 Oct 2024Submission Checks Completed
24 Oct 2024Assigned to Editor
24 Oct 2024Review(s) Completed, Editorial Evaluation Pending
28 Nov 2024Reviewer(s) Assigned