Serious adverse drug reactions in sub-Saharan Africa in the era of
antiretroviral treatment: a systematic review
Abstract
Aim To summarise and describe the burden of serious adverse drug
reactions (ADRs) in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) in the era of
antiretroviral therapy. Methods We searched Medline, CINAHL, Africa-Wide
Information, Scopus, and Web of Science, without language restriction up
to March 2021. We hand-searched reference lists, conference abstracts,
and dissertation databases. We included studies reporting proportions of
admissions attributed to ADRs, admissions prolonged by ADRs, or
in-hospital deaths attributed to ADRs. Two reviewers independently
screened studies, reviewed study quality using a previously published
tool, and extracted data. We tested for heterogeneity using
I2-statistics and summarised study results using medians and
interquartile ranges. Subgroup analyses summarised results by study
quality, setting, methodology, and population. Results From 1005 unique
references identified, we included 15 studies. Median study quality was
7/10; heterogeneity was very high. Median [IQR] proportion of
admissions attributed to ADRs was 4.8% [1.5% to 7.0%] (14
studies), and 6.4% [4.0% to 8.4%] in nine active surveillance
studies in adults. Two paediatric studies reported the proportion of
admissions prolonged by ADRs (0.29% and 0.99%). Three studies reported
the proportion of in-hospital deaths attributed to ADRs (2.5%, 13%,
and 16%). Antiretroviral and antituberculosis drugs were often
implicated in serious ADRs. Conclusion Evidence of the burden of serious
ADRs in SSA is patchy and heterogeneous. A few high-quality studies
suggest the burden is considerable, and that it reflects the regional
impact of the HIV pandemic. Further characterisation of this burden is
required, ideally in studies of standardised methodology.