References
Uncategorized References
1. Fink T, Schlüter M, Heeger CH, et al. Stand-Alone Pulmonary Vein
Isolation Versus Pulmonary Vein Isolation With Additional Substrate
Modification as Index Ablation Procedures in Patients With Persistent
and Long-Standing Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: The Randomized
Alster-Lost-AF Trial (Ablation at St. Georg Hospital for Long-Standing
Persistent Atrial Fibrillation). Circulation Arrhythmia and
electrophysiology. 2017;10(7).
2. Vogler J, Willems S, Sultan A, et al. Pulmonary Vein Isolation Versus
Defragmentation: The CHASE-AF Clinical Trial. Journal of the
American College of Cardiology. 2015;66(24):2743-2752.
3. Verma A, Jiang CY, Betts TR, et al. Approaches to catheter ablation
for persistent atrial fibrillation. The New England journal of
medicine. 2015;372(19):1812-1822.
4. Kircher S, Arya A, Altmann D, et al. Individually tailored vs.
standardized substrate modification during radiofrequency catheter
ablation for atrial fibrillation: a randomized study. Europace :
European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of
the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular
electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.2018;20(11):1766-1775.
5. Yang B, Jiang C, Lin Y, et al. STABLE-SR (Electrophysiological
Substrate Ablation in the Left Atrium During Sinus Rhythm) for the
Treatment of Nonparoxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: A Prospective,
Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial. Circulation Arrhythmia and
electrophysiology. 2017;10(11).
6. Liu Y, Niu XH, Yin X, et al. Elevated Circulating Fibrocytes Is a
Marker of Left Atrial Fibrosis and Recurrence of Persistent Atrial
Fibrillation. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018;7(6).
7. Lo LW, Tai CT, Lin YJ, et al. Progressive remodeling of the atrial
substrate–a novel finding from consecutive voltage mapping in
patients with recurrence of atrial fibrillation after catheter ablation.Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology. 2007;18(3):258-265.
8. Masuda M, Fujita M, Iida O, et al. Influence of underlying substrate
on atrial tachyarrhythmias after pulmonary vein isolation. Heart
rhythm : the official journal of the Heart Rhythm Society.2016;13(4):870-878.
9. Masuda M, Fujita M, Iida O, et al. An E/e’ ratio on echocardiography
predicts the existence of left atrial low-voltage areas and poor
outcomes after catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. Europace
: European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal
of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac
cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.2018;20(5):e60-e68.
10. Yamaguchi T, Tsuchiya T, Fukui A, et al. Impact of the extent of
low-voltage zone on outcomes after voltage-based catheter ablation for
persistent atrial fibrillation. Journal of cardiology.2018;72(5):427-433.
11. Yamaguchi T, Tsuchiya T, Nagamoto Y, et al. Long-term results of
pulmonary vein antrum isolation in patients with atrial fibrillation: an
analysis in regards to substrates and pulmonary vein reconnections.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac
electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing,
arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European
Society of Cardiology. 2014;16(4):511-520.
12. Rolf S, Kircher S, Arya A, et al. Tailored Atrial Substrate
Modification Based On Low-Voltage Areas in Catheter Ablation of Atrial
Fibrillation. Circulation Arrhythmia and electrophysiology. 2014.
13. Yamaguchi T, Tsuchiya T, Nakahara S, et al. Efficacy of Left Atrial
Voltage-Based Catheter Ablation of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation.Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.2016;27(9):1055-1063.
14. Kottkamp H, Berg J, Bender R, Rieger A, Schreiber D. Box Isolation
of Fibrotic Areas (BIFA): A Patient-Tailored Substrate Modification
Approach for Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation. Journal of
cardiovascular electrophysiology. 2016;27(1):22-30.
15. Oakes RS, Badger TJ, Kholmovski EG, et al. Detection and
quantification of left atrial structural remodeling with
delayed-enhancement magnetic resonance imaging in patients with atrial
fibrillation. Circulation. 2009;119(13):1758-1767.
16. Mahnkopf C, Badger TJ, Burgon NS, et al. Evaluation of the left
atrial substrate in patients with lone atrial fibrillation using
delayed-enhanced MRI: implications for disease progression and response
to catheter ablation. Heart rhythm : the official journal of the
Heart Rhythm Society. 2010;7(10):1475-1481.
17. Ashihara T, Haraguchi R, Nakazawa K, et al. The role of fibroblasts
in complex fractionated electrograms during persistent/permanent atrial
fibrillation: implications for electrogram-based catheter ablation.Circ Res. 2012;110(2):275-284.
18. McDowell KS, Vadakkumpadan F, Blake R, et al. Mechanistic inquiry
into the role of tissue remodeling in fibrotic lesions in human atrial
fibrillation. Biophys J. 2013;104(12):2764-2773.
19. Calkins H, Kuck KH, Cappato R, et al. 2012 HRS/EHRA/ECAS Expert
Consensus Statement on Catheter and Surgical Ablation of Atrial
Fibrillation: recommendations for patient selection, procedural
techniques, patient management and follow-up, definitions, endpoints,
and research trial design. Europace : European pacing,
arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working
groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular
electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.2012;14(4):528-606.
20. Saini A, Huizar JF, Tan A, Koneru JN, Ellenbogen KA, Kaszala K. Scar
Homogenization in Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: Evolution and Practice.J Atr Fibrillation. 2017;10(3):1645.
21. Kosiuk J, Dinov B, Kornej J, et al. Prospective, multicenter
validation of a clinical risk score for left atrial arrhythmogenic
substrate based on voltage analysis: DR-FLASH score. Heart rhythm
: the official journal of the Heart Rhythm Society.2015;12(11):2207-2212.
22. D’Ambrosio G, Romano S, Alothman O, et al. Computed
tomography-derived left atrial volume index, sex, and age to predict the
presence and the extent of left atrial low-voltage zones in patients
with atrial fibrillation: The ZAQ score. Journal of cardiovascular
electrophysiology. 2020;31(4):895-902.
23. Matsuda Y, Masuda M, Asai M, et al. A new clinical risk score for
predicting the prevalence of low-voltage areas in patients undergoing
atrial fibrillation ablation. Journal of cardiovascular
electrophysiology. 2020;31(12):3150-3158.
24. Odening KE, Deiß S, Dilling-Boer D, et al. Mechanisms of sex
differences in atrial fibrillation: role of hormones and differences in
electrophysiology, structure, function, and remodelling. Europace
: European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal
of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac
cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.2019;21(3):366-376.
25. Pfannmüller B, Boldt A, Reutemann A, et al. Gender-specific
remodeling in atrial fibrillation? Thorac Cardiovasc Surg.2013;61(1):66-73.
26. Sánchez M, Secades L, Bordallo C, et al. Role of polyamines and
cAMP-dependent mechanisms on 5alpha-dihydrotestosterone-elicited
functional effects in isolated right atria of rat. J Cardiovasc
Pharmacol. 2009;54(4):310-318.
27. Tanaka N, Inoue K, Kobori A, et al. Sex differences in atrial
fibrillation ablation outcomes: insights from a large-scale multicentre
registry. EP Europace. 2020;22(9):1345-1357.
28. Teh AW, Kistler PM, Lee G, et al. Electroanatomic remodeling of the
left atrium in paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation patients
without structural heart disease. Journal of cardiovascular
electrophysiology. 2012;23(3):232-238.
29. Miyamoto K, Tsuchiya T, Narita S, et al. Bipolar electrogram
amplitudes in the left atrium are related to local conduction velocity
in patients with atrial fibrillation. Europace : European pacing,
arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working
groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular
electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.2009;11(12):1597-1605.
30. Hunter RJ, Liu Y, Lu Y, Wang W, Schilling RJ. Left atrial wall
stress distribution and its relationship to electrophysiologic
remodeling in persistent atrial fibrillation. Circulation
Arrhythmia and electrophysiology. 2012;5(2):351-360.
31. Hori Y, Nakahara S, Tsukada N, et al. The influence of the external
structures in atrial fibrillation patients: Relationship to focal low
voltage areas in the left atrium. International journal of
cardiology. 2015;181:225-231.
32. Hori Y, Nakahara S, Kamijima T, et al. Influence of left atrium
anatomical contact area in persistent atrial fibrillation-relationship
between low-voltage area and fractionated electrogram. Circulation
journal : official journal of the Japanese Circulation Society.2014;78(8):1851-1857.
33. Yang G, Yang B, Wei Y, et al. Catheter Ablation of Nonparoxysmal
Atrial Fibrillation Using Electrophysiologically Guided Substrate
Modification During Sinus Rhythm After Pulmonary Vein Isolation.Circulation Arrhythmia and electrophysiology. 2016;9(2):e003382.
34. Masuda M, Asai M, Iida O, et al. Comparison of electrogram waveforms
between a multielectrode mapping catheter and a linear ablation
catheter. Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.2019;42(5):515-520.