Essential Site Maintenance: Authorea-powered sites will be updated circa 15:00-17:00 Eastern on Tuesday 5 November.
There should be no interruption to normal services, but please contact us at help@authorea.com in case you face any issues.

loading page

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma of unknown primary - Who can be offered surgery as the sole treatment modality? A systematic review
  • +1
  • Arunjit Takhar,
  • Mark Wilkie,
  • Devraj Srinivasan,
  • Emma King
Arunjit Takhar
St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Department of ENT Surgery

Corresponding Author:aruntakhar@doctors.org.uk

Author Profile
Mark Wilkie
Royal Adelaide Hospital
Author Profile
Devraj Srinivasan
NHS Lothian
Author Profile
Emma King
University Hospitals Dorset NHS Foundation Trust
Author Profile

Abstract

Objective Evaluate the role of neck dissection (ND) as the sole treatment modality for patients with cervical head and neck squamous cell carcinoma of unknown primary (HNSCCUP). Design Systematic review of observational cohort studies with qualitative synthesis. Setting PubMed, Ovid EMBASE, and Cochrane Controlled register of Trials (CENTRAL) were screened from January 2000 up to October 2021. Participants HNSCCUP patients undergoing ND. Main Outcome Measures The primary outcome was 3-year overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes included disease-free survival (DFS), primary emergence, regional recurrence, and distant metastasis. Results Fourteen eligible studies were identified, including 1,780 patients, of whom 294 received ND as their sole treatment (seven studies) with 3-year OS ranging from 43.9% to 100%. 3-year DFS was reported in four studies (n=62) ranging from 42.8% to 67.0%. 5-year OS and DFS were available in three studies (n=31), ranging from 36.6% to 75.0%, and 43.6% to 67.0%, respectively. The rate of primary emergence ranged from 11.1% to 33.3% (seven studies, n=157), regional relapse from 0.0% to 50.0% (five studies, n=60), and distant metastasis from 0.0% to 3.3% (three studies, n=45). Patients undergoing ND as a sole treatment had predominantly p16 positive N1 (TNM7) disease without ECS. Conclusion Outcomes for HNSCCUP patients undergoing ND alone range widely in the literature but appear reasonable in a subset of patients with early stage p16 positive disease. Data is lacking for p16 negative disease where the potential primary site is more varied and primary emergence appears more common.
29 May 2023Submitted to Clinical Otolaryngology
29 May 2023Submission Checks Completed
29 May 2023Assigned to Editor
14 Jul 2023Reviewer(s) Assigned
30 Sep 2023Review(s) Completed, Editorial Evaluation Pending
30 Sep 2023Editorial Decision: Revise Major
12 Feb 20241st Revision Received
01 Apr 2024Reviewer(s) Assigned
06 Apr 2024Review(s) Completed, Editorial Evaluation Pending
20 Apr 2024Editorial Decision: Revise Minor
01 Sep 20242nd Revision Received
14 Sep 2024Submission Checks Completed
14 Sep 2024Assigned to Editor
14 Sep 2024Reviewer(s) Assigned
28 Sep 2024Review(s) Completed, Editorial Evaluation Pending