REFERENCES
Agrawal, A. A., Johnson, M. T. J., Hastings, A. P.and Maron, J. L. 2013.
A field experiment demonstrating plant life-history evolution and its
eco-evolutionary feedback to seed predator populations. American
Naturalist 181: S35-S45.
Arceo-Gómez, G., Kaczorowski, R. L., Patel, C., and Ashman, T. L.
2019a . Interactive effects between donor and recipient species
mediate fitness costs of heterospecific pollen receipt in a co-flowering
community. Oecologia 189: 1041-1047.
Arceo-Gómez, G., Schroeder, A., Albor, C., Ashman, T. L., Knight, T. M.,
Bennett, J. M., and Suarez, B. et al. 2019b . Global geographic
patterns of heterospecific pollen receipt help uncover potential
ecological and evolutionary impacts across plant communities worldwide.
Scientific Reports 9.
Alarcón, Ruben. 2010. Congruence between Visitation and Pollen-Transport
Networks in a California Plant-Pollinator Community. Oikos 119: 35–44.
Ballantyne, G., K. C. R. Baldock, L. Rendell, and P. G. Willmer. 2017.
Pollinator importance networks illustrate the crucial value of bees in a
highly speciose plant community. Scientific Reports.
Ballantyne, G., Baldock K. C. R., and Willmer, P. G. 2015. Constructing
more informative plant-pollinator networks: Visitation and pollen
deposition networks in a heathland plant community. Proceedings of the
Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
Barrios, B., Pena, S. R., Salas, A. and Koptur, S. 2016. Butterflies
visit more frequently, but bees are better pollinators: The importance
of mouthpart dimensions in effective pollen removal and deposition. AoB
PLANTS.
Bell, K. L., De Vere, N., Keller, A., Richardson, R.T., Annemarie Gous,
Kevin S. Burgess, and Berry J. Brosi. 2016. Pollen DNA Barcoding:
Current Applications and Future Prospects. Genome , 59:629–40.
Bell, Karen L., Fowler, J., Burgess, K.S., Dobbs, E.K., Gruenewald, D.,
Lawley, B., Morozumi, C. and Brosi, B.J. 2017. Applying Pollen DNA
Metabarcoding to the Study of Plant–Pollinator Interactions.
Applications in Plant Sciences 5.
Bell, K. L., Burgess, K.S., Botsch, J.C., Dobbs, E.K, Read, T.D., and
Brosi, B.J. 2019. Quantitative and Qualitative Assessment of Pollen DNA
Metabarcoding Using Constructed Species Mixtures. Molecular Ecology 28:
431–55.
Cane, J. H., and Sipes, S.S. 2006. Characterizing floral specialization
by bees: Analytical methods and a revised lexicon for oligolecty.
Plant–pollinator interactions: From specialization to generalization.
Carvalheiro, L. G., Biesmeijer, J. C., Benadi, G., Fründ, J., Stang, M.,
Bartomeus, I., Kaiser-Bunbury, C. N., et al. 2014. The potential for
indirect effects between co-flowering plants via shared pollinators
depends on resource abundance, accessibility and relatedness. Ecology
Letters 17:1389–1399.
Danecek, P., Auton, A., Abecasis, G., Albers, C.A., Banks, E., DePristo,
M.A., Handsaker, R.E., Lunter, G., Marth, G.T., Sherry, S.T. and McVean,
G., 2011. The variant call format and VCFtools. Bioinformatics, 27:
2156-2158.
Danforth, B. N., Minckley, R. L., and Neff, J. L. 2019. The Solitary
Bees. The Solitary Bees. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New
Jersey.
Deiner, K., Bik, H.M., Mächler, E., Seymour, M., Lacoursière‐Roussel,
A., Altermatt, F., Creer, S., et al. 2017. “Environmental DNA
Metabarcoding: Transforming How We Survey Animal and Plant
Communities.” Molecular Ecology 26 (21): 5872–95.
Eckhart, V.M., Rushing, N.S., Hart, G.M., and Hansen, J.D. 2006.
Frequency-Dependent Pollinator Foraging in Polymorphic Clarkia
xantiana ssp. xantiana Populations: Implications for Flower Colour
Evolution and Pollinator Interactions. Oikos 112: 412–21.
Eisen, K. E., and Geber, M.A. 2018. Ecological sorting and character
displacement contribute to the structure of communities of Clarkia
species. Journal of Evolutionary Biology.
Mitchell, R. J., Irwin, R. E., Flanagan, R. J., and Karron, J. D. 2009.
Ecology and Evolution of Plant-Pollinator Interactions.M Annals of
Botany 103:1355-1363.
Galliot, J. N., Brunel, D., Bérard, A., Chauveau, A., Blanchetête, A.,
Lanore, L., and Farruggia, A. 2017. Investigating a flower-insect
forager network in a mountain grassland community using pollen DNA
barcoding. Journal of Insect Conservation 21:827–837.
Haas B.J., Papanicolaou A., Yassour M., Grabherr M., Blood P.D., Bowden
J., Couger M.B., Eccles D., Li B., Lieber M., Macmanes M.D., Ott M.,
Orvis J., Pochet N., Strozzi F., Weeks N., Westerman R., William T.,
Dewey C.N., Henschel R., Leduc R.D., Friedman N., Regev A. De novo
transcript sequence reconstruction from RNA-seq using the Trinity
platform for reference generation and analysis. 2013. Nature Protocols.
8:1494-512.
James, A.R.M. 2020. Pollinator Sharing and Spatial Partitioning Affect
Flowering Plant Coexistence. Cornell University.
James, A.R.M., Geber, M.A, and Toews, D.P.L. 2020. Quantitative amplicon
sequencing for meta-DNA analysis reveals patterns in pollen use by bees,
Dryad, Dataset, https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.0p2ngf1x0
Johnson, C. A., and Bronstein, J.L. 2019. Coexistence and competitive
exclusion in mutualism. ecology 100:e02708.
Kubista, M., Andrade, J.M., Bengtsson, M., Forootan, A., Jonák, J.,
Lind, K., Sindelka, R., Sjöback, R., Sjögreen, B., Strömbom, L.,
Ståhlberg, A., Zoric, N. 20016. The real-time polymerase chain reaction.
Molecular Aspects of Medicine 27: 95-125.
Lucas, A., Bodger, O., Brosi, B. J., Ford, C. R., Forman, D. W., Greig,
C., Hegarty, M., et al. 2018. Generalisation and specialisation in
hoverfly (Syrphidae) grassland pollen transport networks revealed by DNA
metabarcoding. Journal of Animal Ecology 87:1008-1021.
MacSwain, J. W., Raven, P. H., and Thorp, R. W. 1973. Comparative
behavior of bees and Onagraceae. IV. Clarkia bees of the Western United
States. University of California Publications in Entomology 70:1–80.
Martin, A. C., and Harvey, W. J. 2017. The Global Pollen Project: a new
tool for pollen identification and the dissemination of physical
reference collections. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 8:892–897.
Mayfield, M. M., Waser, N. M., and Price, M. V. 2001. Exploring the
“most effective pollinator principle” with complex flowers: Bumblebees
and Ipomopsis aggregata. Annals of Botany 88: 591-596.
Mitchell, R. J., Irwin, R. E., Flanagan, R. J., and Karron, J. D. 2009.
Ecology and evolution of plant-pollinator interactions. Annals of Botany
103: 1355-1363.
Michener, C. D., McGinley, R. J., and Danforth, B. N. 1994. The Bee
Genera of North and Central America. Edited by Rosemary Sheffield.
Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press.
Moeller, D. A. 2005. Pollinator community structure and sources of
spatial variation in plant-pollinator interactions in Clarkia
xantiana ssp. xantiana . Oecologia 142: 28-37.
Morales-Castilla, I., Matias, M. G., Gravel, D. and Araújo, M. B. 2015.
Inferring biotic interactions from proxies. Trends in Ecology and
Evolution 30: 347–356.
Popic, T. J., Wardle, G. M., and Davila, Y. C. 2013. Flower-visitor
networks only partially predict the function of pollen transport by
bees. Austral Ecology 38: 76-86.
Richardson, D. M., Allsopp, N., D’antonio, C. M., Milton, S. J., and
Rejmánek, M. 2000. Plant Invasions — the Role of Mutualisms.
Biological Reviews 75: 65–93.
Roslin, T., Traugott, M., Jonsson, M., Stone, G. N., Creer, S., and
Symondson, W.O.C. 2019. Introduction: Special Issue on Species
Interactions, Ecological Networks and Community Dynamics – Untangling
the Entangled Bank Using Molecular Techniques. Molecular Ecology28: 157–64.
Sickel, W., Ankenbrand, M. J., Grimmer, G., Holzschuh, A., Härtel, S.,
Lanzen, J., Keller, A. et al. 2015. Increased efficiency in identifying
mixed pollen samples by meta‐barcoding with a dual‐indexing approach.
BMC Ecology 15: 20.
Singh, I. 2013. Master’s Thesis. Cornell University.
Schicke, K. and Hofmann, C. 2007. Thermocycler with a temperature
control block driven in cycle. US Patent number US 2007/0212774 A1.
Sousa, L.L., Silva, S. M., and Xavier, R. 2019. DNA Metabarcoding in
Diet Studies: Unveiling Ecological Aspects in Aquatic and Terrestrial
Ecosystems.” Environmental DNA 1: 199–214.
Vázquez, D. P., Ramos-Jiliberto, R., Urbani, P., and Valdovinos, F. S.
2015. A conceptual framework for studying the strength of plant –
animal mutualistic interactions. Ecology Letters 18: 385-400.