REFERENCES
Agrawal, A. A., Johnson, M. T. J., Hastings, A. P.and Maron, J. L. 2013. A field experiment demonstrating plant life-history evolution and its eco-evolutionary feedback to seed predator populations. American Naturalist 181: S35-S45.
Arceo-Gómez, G., Kaczorowski, R. L., Patel, C., and Ashman, T. L. 2019a . Interactive effects between donor and recipient species mediate fitness costs of heterospecific pollen receipt in a co-flowering community. Oecologia 189: 1041-1047.
Arceo-Gómez, G., Schroeder, A., Albor, C., Ashman, T. L., Knight, T. M., Bennett, J. M., and Suarez, B. et al. 2019b . Global geographic patterns of heterospecific pollen receipt help uncover potential ecological and evolutionary impacts across plant communities worldwide. Scientific Reports 9.
Alarcón, Ruben. 2010. Congruence between Visitation and Pollen-Transport Networks in a California Plant-Pollinator Community. Oikos 119: 35–44.
Ballantyne, G., K. C. R. Baldock, L. Rendell, and P. G. Willmer. 2017. Pollinator importance networks illustrate the crucial value of bees in a highly speciose plant community. Scientific Reports.
Ballantyne, G., Baldock K. C. R., and Willmer, P. G. 2015. Constructing more informative plant-pollinator networks: Visitation and pollen deposition networks in a heathland plant community. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
Barrios, B., Pena, S. R., Salas, A. and Koptur, S. 2016. Butterflies visit more frequently, but bees are better pollinators: The importance of mouthpart dimensions in effective pollen removal and deposition. AoB PLANTS.
Bell, K. L., De Vere, N., Keller, A., Richardson, R.T., Annemarie Gous, Kevin S. Burgess, and Berry J. Brosi. 2016. Pollen DNA Barcoding: Current Applications and Future Prospects. Genome , 59:629–40.
Bell, Karen L., Fowler, J., Burgess, K.S., Dobbs, E.K., Gruenewald, D., Lawley, B., Morozumi, C. and Brosi, B.J. 2017. Applying Pollen DNA Metabarcoding to the Study of Plant–Pollinator Interactions. Applications in Plant Sciences 5.
Bell, K. L., Burgess, K.S., Botsch, J.C., Dobbs, E.K, Read, T.D., and Brosi, B.J. 2019. Quantitative and Qualitative Assessment of Pollen DNA Metabarcoding Using Constructed Species Mixtures. Molecular Ecology 28: 431–55.
Cane, J. H., and Sipes, S.S. 2006. Characterizing floral specialization by bees: Analytical methods and a revised lexicon for oligolecty. Plant–pollinator interactions: From specialization to generalization.
Carvalheiro, L. G., Biesmeijer, J. C., Benadi, G., Fründ, J., Stang, M., Bartomeus, I., Kaiser-Bunbury, C. N., et al. 2014. The potential for indirect effects between co-flowering plants via shared pollinators depends on resource abundance, accessibility and relatedness. Ecology Letters 17:1389–1399.
Danecek, P., Auton, A., Abecasis, G., Albers, C.A., Banks, E., DePristo, M.A., Handsaker, R.E., Lunter, G., Marth, G.T., Sherry, S.T. and McVean, G., 2011. The variant call format and VCFtools. Bioinformatics, 27: 2156-2158.
Danforth, B. N., Minckley, R. L., and Neff, J. L. 2019. The Solitary Bees. The Solitary Bees. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
Deiner, K., Bik, H.M., Mächler, E., Seymour, M., Lacoursière‐Roussel, A., Altermatt, F., Creer, S., et al. 2017. “Environmental DNA Metabarcoding: Transforming How We Survey Animal and Plant Communities.” Molecular Ecology 26 (21): 5872–95.
Eckhart, V.M., Rushing, N.S., Hart, G.M., and Hansen, J.D. 2006. Frequency-Dependent Pollinator Foraging in Polymorphic Clarkia xantiana ssp. xantiana Populations: Implications for Flower Colour Evolution and Pollinator Interactions. Oikos 112: 412–21.
Eisen, K. E., and Geber, M.A. 2018. Ecological sorting and character displacement contribute to the structure of communities of Clarkia species. Journal of Evolutionary Biology.
Mitchell, R. J., Irwin, R. E., Flanagan, R. J., and Karron, J. D. 2009. Ecology and Evolution of Plant-Pollinator Interactions.M Annals of Botany 103:1355-1363.
Galliot, J. N., Brunel, D., Bérard, A., Chauveau, A., Blanchetête, A., Lanore, L., and Farruggia, A. 2017. Investigating a flower-insect forager network in a mountain grassland community using pollen DNA barcoding. Journal of Insect Conservation 21:827–837.
Haas B.J., Papanicolaou A., Yassour M., Grabherr M., Blood P.D., Bowden J., Couger M.B., Eccles D., Li B., Lieber M., Macmanes M.D., Ott M., Orvis J., Pochet N., Strozzi F., Weeks N., Westerman R., William T., Dewey C.N., Henschel R., Leduc R.D., Friedman N., Regev A. De novo transcript sequence reconstruction from RNA-seq using the Trinity platform for reference generation and analysis. 2013. Nature Protocols. 8:1494-512.
James, A.R.M. 2020. Pollinator Sharing and Spatial Partitioning Affect Flowering Plant Coexistence. Cornell University.
James, A.R.M., Geber, M.A, and Toews, D.P.L. 2020. Quantitative amplicon sequencing for meta-DNA analysis reveals patterns in pollen use by bees, Dryad, Dataset, https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.0p2ngf1x0
Johnson, C. A., and Bronstein, J.L. 2019. Coexistence and competitive exclusion in mutualism. ecology 100:e02708.
Kubista, M., Andrade, J.M., Bengtsson, M., Forootan, A., Jonák, J., Lind, K., Sindelka, R., Sjöback, R., Sjögreen, B., Strömbom, L., Ståhlberg, A., Zoric, N. 20016. The real-time polymerase chain reaction. Molecular Aspects of Medicine 27: 95-125.
Lucas, A., Bodger, O., Brosi, B. J., Ford, C. R., Forman, D. W., Greig, C., Hegarty, M., et al. 2018. Generalisation and specialisation in hoverfly (Syrphidae) grassland pollen transport networks revealed by DNA metabarcoding. Journal of Animal Ecology 87:1008-1021.
MacSwain, J. W., Raven, P. H., and Thorp, R. W. 1973. Comparative behavior of bees and Onagraceae. IV. Clarkia bees of the Western United States. University of California Publications in Entomology 70:1–80.
Martin, A. C., and Harvey, W. J. 2017. The Global Pollen Project: a new tool for pollen identification and the dissemination of physical reference collections. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 8:892–897.
Mayfield, M. M., Waser, N. M., and Price, M. V. 2001. Exploring the “most effective pollinator principle” with complex flowers: Bumblebees and Ipomopsis aggregata. Annals of Botany 88: 591-596.
Mitchell, R. J., Irwin, R. E., Flanagan, R. J., and Karron, J. D. 2009. Ecology and evolution of plant-pollinator interactions. Annals of Botany 103: 1355-1363.
Michener, C. D., McGinley, R. J., and Danforth, B. N. 1994. The Bee Genera of North and Central America. Edited by Rosemary Sheffield. Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press.
Moeller, D. A. 2005. Pollinator community structure and sources of spatial variation in plant-pollinator interactions in Clarkia xantiana ssp. xantiana . Oecologia 142: 28-37.
Morales-Castilla, I., Matias, M. G., Gravel, D. and Araújo, M. B. 2015. Inferring biotic interactions from proxies. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 30: 347–356.
Popic, T. J., Wardle, G. M., and Davila, Y. C. 2013. Flower-visitor networks only partially predict the function of pollen transport by bees. Austral Ecology 38: 76-86.
Richardson, D. M., Allsopp, N., D’antonio, C. M., Milton, S. J., and Rejmánek, M. 2000. Plant Invasions — the Role of Mutualisms. Biological Reviews 75: 65–93.
Roslin, T., Traugott, M., Jonsson, M., Stone, G. N., Creer, S., and Symondson, W.O.C. 2019. Introduction: Special Issue on Species Interactions, Ecological Networks and Community Dynamics – Untangling the Entangled Bank Using Molecular Techniques. Molecular Ecology28: 157–64.
Sickel, W., Ankenbrand, M. J., Grimmer, G., Holzschuh, A., Härtel, S., Lanzen, J., Keller, A. et al. 2015. Increased efficiency in identifying mixed pollen samples by meta‐barcoding with a dual‐indexing approach. BMC Ecology 15: 20.
Singh, I. 2013. Master’s Thesis. Cornell University.
Schicke, K. and Hofmann, C. 2007. Thermocycler with a temperature control block driven in cycle. US Patent number US 2007/0212774 A1.
Sousa, L.L., Silva, S. M., and Xavier, R. 2019. DNA Metabarcoding in Diet Studies: Unveiling Ecological Aspects in Aquatic and Terrestrial Ecosystems.” Environmental DNA 1: 199–214.
Vázquez, D. P., Ramos-Jiliberto, R., Urbani, P., and Valdovinos, F. S. 2015. A conceptual framework for studying the strength of plant – animal mutualistic interactions. Ecology Letters 18: 385-400.