The Distributed Hydrology Soil Vegetation Model (DHSVM) code was parallelized for distributed memory computers using the Global Arrays (GA) programming model. To analyze parallel performance, DHSVM was used to simulate the hydrology in two river basins of significant size located in the northwest continental United States and southwest Canada at 90~m resolution: the (1) Clearwater (25,000~km) and (2) Columbia (668,000~km) River basins. Meteorological forcing applied to both basins was dynamically down-scaled from a regional reanalysis using the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model and read into DHSVM as 2D maps for each time step. Parallel code speedup was significant. Run times for 1-year simulations were reduced by an order of magnitude for both test basins. A maximum parallel speedup of 105 was attained with 480 processors while simulating the Columbia River basin. Speedup was limited by input-dominated tasks, particularly the input of meteorological forcing data.

Quantifying the multiscale feedback between hydrodynamics and biogeochemistry is key to reliable modeling of river corridor systems. However, accurate and efficient hydrodynamics models over large spatiotemporal scales have not yet been established due to limited surveys of riverbed roughness and high computational costs. This work presents a semi-automated workflow that combines topographic and water stage surveys, computational fluid dynamics modeling, distributed wall resistance modeling, and high-performance computing to simulate flow in a 30-kilometer-long reach at the Columbia River during 2011-2019. The results show that this workflow enables a high accuracy in modeling water stage at all seven survey locations during calibration (1 month) and validation (65 months) periods. It also enables a high computational efficiency to model the streamflow during a 58-month solution-time within less than a 6-day wall-clock-time with mesh number, time step, and CPU hours of about 1.2 million, 3 seconds, and 1.1 million hours, respectively. Using the well-validated results, we show that riverbed dynamic pressure is randomly distributed over all spatiotemporal scales with its cross-sectional average values approximately quantified by a normal distribution with a mean and standard deviation of -0.353 m and 0.0352 m; bed shear stress is affected by flowrate and large- and small-scale topographic features with cross-sectional maximum values following a smooth but asymmetric distribution with 90% of its value falling between 5 Pa and 35 Pa; and hydrostatic pressure is influenced by flowrate and large-scale topographic features with cross-sectional maximum values quantified by a discontinuous and skewed distribution determined by streamwise topographic variations.

Quantifying hydrologic exchange fluxes (HEF) and subsurface water residence times (RT) are important for managing the water quality and ecosystem health in dynamic river corridor systems. Laboratory-scale experiments and models have shown that hydrodynamic pressure variations on the riverbed induced by dynamic river flows can strongly impact HEFs and RTs. In this study, the impacts of hydrodynamic pressure on HEFs and RT for a 30 km section of the Columbia River in Washington State over a three-year period were quantitatively evaluated using a coupled transient three-dimensional (3D) multi-phase surface and subsurface water flow transport approach. Based on comparisons between model simulations with and without considering hydrodynamic pressure, we found that hydrodynamic pressure increase the net HEFs by 7% of flowing into river from subsurface domain, and also leads to a reduction of the area with long RT, and increase of area with short RT.

Quantifying hydrologic exchange fluxes (HEF) and subsurface water residence times (RT) are important for managing the water quality and ecosystem health in dynamic river corridor systems. Because of limited field accessibility, numerical models typically have been used to quantify HEFs and RTs. These models, however, usually are limited to local-scale bedforms and are based on the assumption that hydrostatic pressure drives surface and subsurface water exchanges. Previous laboratory-scale experiments and models have shown that hydrodynamic pressure variations on the riverbed induced by dynamic river flows can strongly impact HEFs and RTs. In this study, the impacts of hydrodynamic pressure on HEFs and RT for a 30 km section of the Columbia River in Washington State over a three-year period were quantitatively evaluated using a coupled transient three-dimensional (3D) multi-phase surface and subsurface water flow transport approach. Based on comparisons of the model simulations with a reference case that considered only hydrostatic pressure, we found that hydrodynamic pressure significantly enhances upwelling and downwelling HEFs by 2 and 1.7 times, respectively, in the investigated river section and also leads to a reduction of the most likely RT by one order of magnitude (i.e., from hundreds of days to tens of days).