References
1. De Geyter C, Calhaz-Jorge C, Kupka MS, Wyns C, Mocanu E, Motrenko T,
et al. ART in Europe, 2014: results generated from European registries
by ESHRE: The European IVF-monitoring Consortium (EIM) for the European
Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE), 2018. Human
reproduction 2018;33: 1586-601.
2. Veltman-Verhulst SM, Hughes E, Ayeleke RO, Cohlen BJ. Intra-uterine
insemination for unexplained subfertility, 2016.
The Cochrane database of systematic
reviews 2016;19: 2 (CD001838-CD).
3. Cohlen B, Bijkerk A, Van der Poel S, Ombelet W. IUI: review and
systematic assessment of the evidence that supports global
recommendations, 2018. Human reproduction update 2018;24:300-19.
4. Group EC W. Intrauterine insemination, 2009. Human reproduction
update 2009;15:265-77.
5. Plosker SM, Jacobson W, Amato P. Predicting and optimizing success in
an intra-uterine insemination programme, 1994. Human reproduction
1994;9: 2014-21.
6. Ragni G, Somigliana E, Vegetti W. Timing of intrauterine
insemination: where are we? 2004. Fertility and sterility 2004;82:25-35.
7. Evans J, Salamonsen LA. Too much of a good thing? Experimental
evidence suggests prolonged exposure to hCG is detrimental to
endometrial receptivity, 2013. Human reproduction 2013;28:1610-9.
8. Ezoe K, Daikoku T, Yabuuchi A, Murata N, Kawano H, Abe T, et al.
Ovarian stimulation using human chorionic gonadotrophin impairs
blastocyst implantation and decidualization by altering ovarian hormone
levels and downstream signaling in mice, 2014. Molecular human
reproduction 2014;20:1101-16.
9. Kyrou D, Kolibianakis EM, Fatemi HM, Grimbizis GF, Theodoridis TD,
Camus M, et al. Spontaneous triggering of ovulation versus HCG
administration in patients undergoing IUI: a prospective randomized
study, 2012. Reproductive biomedicine online 2012;25:278-83.
10. Kosmas IP, Tatsioni A, Fatemi HM, Kolibianakis EM, Tournaye H,
Devroey P. Human chorionic gonadotropin administration vs. luteinizing
monitoring for intrauterine insemination timing, after administration of
clomiphene citrate: a meta-analysis, 2007. Fertility and sterility
2007;87:607-12.
11. El Hachem H, Antaki R, Sylvestre C, Lapensee L, Legendre G, Bouet
PE. Timing therapeutic donor inseminations in natural cycles: human
chorionic gonadotrophin administration versus urinary LH monitoring,
2017. Reproductive biomedicine online 2017;35:174-9.
12. Martinez AR, Bernadus RE, Voorhorst FJ, Vermeiden JP, Schoemaker J.
A controlled study of human chorionic gonadotrophin induced ovulation
versus urinary luteinizing hormone surge for timing of intrauterine
insemination, 1991. Human reproduction (Oxford, England) 1991;6:1247-51.
13. Mohamad E. Ghanem N, Bakre, Mohamad A. Emam, Laila A. The effects of
timing of intrauterine insemination in relation to ovulation and the
number of inseminations on cycle pregnancy rate in common infertility
etiologies, 2011. Human reproduction 2011. 26, 576-83
14. Rijsdijk OE, Cantineau AE, Bourdrez P, Gijsen TP, Gondrie ET,
Sprengers O, et al. Intrauterine insemination: simultaneous with or 36 h
after HCG? A randomized clinical trial, 2019. Reproductive biomedicine
online 2019;39, 262-268
15. Blockeel C, Knez J, Polyzos NP, De Vos M, Camus M, Tournaye H.
Should an intrauterine insemination with donor semen be performed 1 or 2
days after the spontaneous LH rise? 2014. A prospective RCT. Human
reproduction 2014; 29:697 -703.
16. Cooper TG, Noonan E, von Eckardstein S, Auger J, Baker HW, Behre HM,
et al. World Health Organization reference values for human semen
characteristics, 2010. Hum Reprod Update 2010; 16:231–45.
17. Zarek SM, Hill MJ, Richter KS, Wu M, DeCherney AH, Osheroff JE, et
al. Single-donor and double-donor sperm intrauterine insemination
cycles: does double intrauterine insemination increase clinical
pregnancy rates? 2014. Fertility and sterility 2014;102:739-43.
18. Iberico G, Vioque J, Ariza N, Lozano JM, Roca M, Llacer J, et al.
Analysis of factors influencing pregnancy rates in homologous
intrauterine insemination, 2004. Fertility and sterility
2004;81(5):1308-13.
19. Thijssen A, Creemers A, Van der Elst W, Creemers E, Vandormael E,
Dhont N, et al. Predictive factors influencing pregnancy rates after
intrauterine insemination with frozen donor semen: a prospective cohort
study, 2017. Reproductive biomedicine online 2017;34:590-7.
20. ESHRE Capri Workshop Group. Intrauterine insemination, 2009. Hum
Reprod Update 2009; 15:265-77.
21. Arab-Zozani, M. and C. O. Nastri. Single versus double intrauterine
insemination (IUI) for pregnancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis,
2017. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2017; 215: 75-84.
22. Taerk E, Hughes E, Greenberg C, Neal M, Amin S, Faghih M, et al.
Controlled Ovarian Hyperstimulation with Intrauterine Insemination Is
More Successful After r-hCG Administration Than Spontaneous LH Surge,
2017. Journal of reproduction & infertility 2017;18:316-22.
23. Mitwally MF, Abdel-Razeq S, Casper RF. Human chorionic gonadotropin
administration is associated with high pregnancy rates during ovarian
stimulation and timed intercourse or intrauterine insemination, 2004.
Reproductive biology and endocrinology 2004;2:55.
24. Jarvela IY, Tapanainen JS, Martikainen H. Improved pregnancy rate
with administration of hCG after intrauterine insemination: a pilot
study, 2010. Reproductive biology and endocrinology 2010;8:18.
25. Cantineau AE, Janssen MJ, Cohlen BJ , Allersma T. Synchronised
approach for intrauterine insemination in subfertile couples, 2014. The
Cochrane database of systematic reviews 2014:Cd006942.
26. Miller PB, Soules MR. The usefulness of a urinary LH kit for
ovulation prediction during menstrual cycles of normal women, 1996.
Obstet Gynecol 1996; 87:13-7.d
27. Lemmens L, Kos S, Beijer C, Braat DDM, Nelen WLDM, Wetzels AMM.
Techniques used for IUI: is it time for a change ? 2017. Hum Reprod
2017;32:1835-45.