Comparison of results for model B and for CFD model.
Results obtained from model B and model CFD coded in Comsol package were
compared as previously described in RESULTS AND DISCUSSION section.
Results are presented in Table B1 and in Fig. B1. The dispersion
coefficients values are similar, the average difference is about five
percent. However statistical indicators presented in Table B1 show that
the method based on transfer function (model B) fits experimental result
better than CFD model. The same relation is visible in Fig. B1, as well.
Lines that are generated by model B lies closer to the experimental
lines than those generated by model CFD. It confirm the conclusion
formulated in the main part of the paper, that models based on transfer
function can be recommended as the alternative for models coded using
CFD programs.
Table B1. Results of Model B and Model CFD solutions for
non-packed sample tube