Factors implicating the validity and interpretation of simulated
microgravity studies
Abstract
Simulated microgravity (s-µg) devices provide unique conditions for
elucidating the effects of gravitational unloading on biological
processes. However, s-µg devices are being increasingly applied for
mechanobiology studies without proper characterization of the mechanical
environment generated by these systems, which confounds results and
limits their interpretation. Furthermore, the cell culture methodology
central to s-µg approaches introduces new conditions that can
fundamentally affect results, but these are currently not addressed. It
is essential to understand the complete culture environment and how
constituent conditions can individually and synergistically affect
cellular responses in order to interpret results correctly, otherwise
outcomes may be misattributed to the effects of microgravity alone. For
the benefit of the growing space biology community, this article
critically reviews a typical s-µg cell culture environment in terms of
three key conditions: fluid-mediated mechanical stimuli, oxygen tension
and biochemical (cell signalling). Their implications for biological
analysis are categorically discussed. A new set of controls is proposed
to properly evaluate the respective effects of s-µg culture conditions,
along with a reporting matrix and potential strategies for addressing
the current limitations of simulated microgravity devices as a platform
for mechanobiology.