References
Barrat, A., Barthélemy, M., Pastor-Satorras, R. & Vespignani, A. 2004.
The architecture of complex weighted networks. Proc. Natl. Acad.
Sci. U. S. A. 101 , 3747–3752
Barta, Z. & Giraldeau, L. 2001. Breeding colonies as information
centers: a reappraisal of information-based hypotheses using the
producer-scrounger game. Behav. Ecol. 12 , 121–127
Bijleveld, A. I., Egas, M., van Gils, J. A. & Piersma, T. 2010. Beyond
the information centre hypothesis: Communal roosting for information on
food, predators, travel companions and mates? Oikos 119 ,
277–285
Bradley, D. et al. 2017. Resetting predator baselines in coral
reef ecosystems. Sci. Rep. 7 , 43131.
doi:10.1038/srep43131
Buckley, N. J. 1997. Spatial-concentration effects and the importance of
local enhancement in the evolution of colonial breeding in seabirds.Am. Nat. 149 , 1091–1112
Cantor, M. & Farine, D. R. 2018. Simple foraging rules in competitive
environments can generate socially structured populations. Ecol.
Evol. 8 , 4978-4991 doi:10.1002/ece3.4061
Clark, C. W. & Mangel, M. 1984. Foraging and flocking strategies:
information in an uncertain environment. Am. Nat. 123 ,
626–641
Clauset, A., Newman, M. E. J. & Moore, C. 2004. Finding community
structure in very large networks. Physic. Rev.doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.70.066111
Csardi, G. & Nepusz, T. 2006. The igraph software package for complex
network research. InterJournal Complex Syst. 1695
Dall, S. R. X., Giraldeau, L. A., Olsson, O., McNamara, J. M. &
Stephens, D. W. 2005. Information and its use by animals in evolutionary
ecology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 20 , 187–193
Egert-Berg et al. 2018. Resource ephemerality drives social foraging in
bats. Curr. Biol . 28, 3667-3673
Evans, J. C., Votier, S. C. & Dall, S. R. X. 2016. Information use in
colonial living. Biol. Rev. 91 , 658–672
Farine, D. R. 2014. Measuring phenotypic assortment in animal social
networks: Weighted associations are more robust than binary edges.Anim. Behav. 89 , 141–153
Finn, J. T. et al. 2014. Applying network methods to acoustic
telemetry data: Modeling the movements of tropical marine fishes.Ecol. Modell. 293 , 139–149
Francesiaz, C. et al. 2017. Familiarity drives social philopatry
in an obligate colonial breeder with weak interannual breeding-site
fidelity. Anim. Behav. 124 , 125–133
Franks, D. W., Ruxton, G. D. & James, R. 2010. Sampling animal
association networks with the gambit of the group. Behav. Ecol.
Sociobiol. 64 , 493–503
Gil, M. A., Emberts, Z., Jones, H. & St. Mary, C. M. 2017. Social
information on fear and food drives animal grouping and fitness.Am. Nat. 189 , 227-241
Gil, M. A., Hein, A. M., Spiegel, O., Baskett, M. L. & Sih, A. 2018.
Social information links individual behavior to population and community
dynamics. Trends Ecol. Evol. 33 , 535–548
Giraldeau, L.-A. & Beauchamp, G. 1999. Food exploitation: searching for
the optimal joining policy. Trends Ecol. Evol .14 ,
102–106
Guttridge, T. L., Myrberg, A. A., Porcher, I. F., Sims, D. W. & Krause,
J. 2009. The role of learning in shark behaviour. Fish Fish.10 , 450–469
Harel, R. et al. 2017. Social foraging and individual consistency
in following behaviour : Testing the information centre hypothesis in
free- ranging vultures. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 284 ,
20162654
Heupel, M. R. & Simpfendorfer, C. A. 2014. Importance of environmental
and biological drivers in the presence and space use of a
reef-associated shark. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 496 , 47–57
Ilany, A., Booms, A. S. & Holekamp, K. E. 2015. Topological effects of
network structure on long-term social network dynamics in a wild mammal.Ecol. Lett. 18 , 687–695
Jacoby, D. M. P., Brooks, E. J., Croft, D. P. & Sims, D. W. 2012.
Developing a deeper understanding of animal movements and spatial
dynamics through novel application of network analyses. Methods
Ecol. Evol. 3 , 574–583
Jacoby, D. M. P. & Freeman, R. 2016. Emerging network-based tools in
movement ecology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 31 , 301-314
Jacoby, D. M. P., Papastamatiou, Y. P. & Freeman, R. 2016. Inferring
animal social networks and leadership: applications for passive
monitoring arrays. J. R. Soc. Interface 13 , 20160676
Janson, C. H. & Goldsmith, M. L. 1995. Predicting group size in
primates: Foraging costs and predation risks. Behav. Ecol.6 , 326–336
Kerth, G., Perony, N. & Schweitzer, F. 2011. Bats are able to maintain
long-term social relationships despite the high fission-fusion dynamics
of their groups. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 278 ,
2761–2767
Krause, J. & Ruxton, G. D. 2002. Living in Groups , Oxford
University Press
Lang, S. D. J. & Farine, D. R. 2017. A multidimensional framework for
studying social predation strategies. Nat. Ecol. Evol.1 , 1230-1239
McCauley, D. J. et al. 2012. Assessing the effects of large
mobile predators on ecosystem connectivity. Ecol. Appl.22 , 1711–1717
Meyer, C. G., Holland, K. & Papastamatiou, Y. P. 2007. Seasonal and
diel movements of giant trevally Caranx ignobilis at remote
Hawaiian atolls: implications for the design of Marine Protected Areas.Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 333 , 13–25
Meyer, C. G., Papastamatiou, Y. P. & Clark, T. B. 2010. Differential
movement patterns and site fidelity among trophic groups of reef fishes
in a Hawaiian marine protected area. Mar. Biol. 157 ,
1499–1511
Mourier, J., Vercelloni, J. & Planes, S. 2012. Evidence of social
communities in a spatially structured network of a free-ranging shark
species. Anim. Behav. 83 , 389–401
Mourier, J., Lédée, E., Guttridge, T. & Jacoby, D. M. P. 2018. Network
analysis and theory in shark ecology: Methods and applications. InShark Research: Emerging Technologies and Applications for the
Field and Laboratory 337–356
Nowak, M. A., Tarnita, C. E. & Wilson, E. O. 2010. The evolution of
eusociality. Nature 466 , 1057–1062
Papastamatiou, Y. P. et al. 2018a. Activity seascapes highlight
central place foraging strategies in marine predators that do not
require a home. Mov. Ecol. 6 , 9
doi:10.1186/s40462-018-0127-3
Papastamatiou, Y. P. et al. 2018b. Spatial separation without
territoriality in shark communities. Oikos 127 , 1–13
Psorakis, I., Roberts, S. J., Rezek, I. & Sheldon, B. C. 2012.
Inferring social network structure in ecological systems from
spatio-temporal data streams. J. R. Soc. Interface 9 ,
3055–3066
Riotte-Lambert, L. & Matthiopoulos, J. 2018. Communal and efficient
movement routines can develop spontaneously through public information
use. Behav. Ecol. 30 , 408-416 doi:10.1093/beheco/ary180
Schilds, A. et al. 2019. Evidence for non-random co-occurrences
in a white shark aggregation. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol.73 , 138
Sernland, E. & Olsson, O. 2003. Does information sharing promote group
foraging? Proc. R. Soc. B. 270, 1137–1141
doi:10.1098/rspb.2003.2352
Shizuka, D. et al. 2014. Across-year social stability shapes
network structure in wintering migrant sparrows. Ecol. Lett.17 , 998–1007
Smolla, M., Gilman, T. R., Galla, T. & Shultz, S. 2015. Competition for
resources can explain patterns of social and individual learning in
nature. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 282 , 20151405
Spiegel, O., Leu, S. T., Sih, A. & Bull, C. M. 2016.
Socially-interacting or indifferent neighbors? Randomization of movement
paths to tease apart social preference and spatial constraints.Methods Ecol. Evol. 7 , 971–979
Spiegel, O., Leu, S. T., Bull, C. M. & Sih, A. 2017. What’s your move?
Movement as a link between personality and spatial dynamics in animal
populations. Ecol. Lett. 20 , 3–18
Strandburg-Peshkin, A., Farine, D. R., Couzin, I. D. & Crofoot, M. C.
2015. Shared decision-making drives collective movement in wild baboons.Science 348 , 1358–1361
Thiebault, A., Semeria, M., Lett, C. & Tremblay, Y. 2016. How to
capture fish in a school? Effect of successive predator attacks on
seabird feeding success. J. Anim. Ecol. 85 , 157–167
Titcomb, E. M., O’Corry-Crowe, G., Hartel, E. F. & Mazzoil, M. S. 2015.
Social communities and spatiotemporal dynamics of association patterns
in estuarine bottlenose dolphins. Mar. Mammal Sci. 31 ,
1314–1337
Vickery, W., Giraldeau, L., Templeton, J., Kramer, D. & Chapman, C.
1991. Producers, scroungers, and group foraging. Am. Nat.137 , 847–86
Wakefield, E. D. et al. 2013. Space partitioning without
territoriality in Gannets. Science 68 , 16–19
Wang, C. et al. 2013. A dyadic reciprocity index for repeated
interaction networks. Netw. Sci. 1 , 31–48
Wilensky, U. 1999. NetLogo.
Wolf, J. B. W., Mawdsley, D., Trillmich, F. & James, R. 2007. Social
structure in a colonial mammal: unravelling hidden structural layers and
their foundations by network analysis. Anim. Behav. 74 ,
1293–1302