Intraspecific variability (IV) has been proposed as a new track to explain species coexistence. Previous studies generally assumed that IV results from intrinsic differences between conspecifics that widen species’ fundamental niches and blur differences among species, thus impeding stable coexistence, but also slowing down the rate of competitive exclusion. Based on a body of evidence, we here argue that IV does not necessarily imply differences among conspecifics, nor species niches overlap: conspecifics differ in their measured attributes mainly due to differences in the micro-environment they thrive in. Consequently, they respond more similarly to environmental variation than heterospecifics, thereby concentrating competition within species – a necessary condition for species coexistence. We call for new studies exploring observed IV as an outcome of species-specific responses to high-dimensional environmental variations that can lead to inversions of species hierarchy in space and time promoting stable coexistence.

Ecological theory aims to understand how and why species differences allow competitors to coexist, but explanations remain inconsistent with data. Tightly constrained parameter tradeoffs needed for coexistence in models contrast with evidence that forests can support high diversity and be invaded repeatedly by species that lack specialized tradeoffs. By translating environmental responses to individual covariance, a universal coexistence hypothesis shows i) that species differences lead to a natural tendency to concentrate competition within the species, the common feature needed to promote coexistence in models, and ii) the fingerprint of this effect is available in covariances between individuals that can be observed in nature. The many ways in which species differ make high diversity almost inevitable. This covariance not only provides the evidence for this mechanism; it further provides a new direction for earth surface models that currently cannot sustain diverse communities despite large numbers of evidence-based parameters.

Context Intraspecific variability (IV) has been proposed to explain species coexistence in diverse communities. Assuming, sometimes implicitly, that conspecific individuals can perform differently in the same environment and that IV blurs species differences, previous studies have found contrasting results regarding the effect of IV on species coexistence. Objective We aim at showing that the larg IV observed in data does not mean that conspecific individuals are necessarily different in their response to the environment and that the role of high-dimensional environmental variation in determining IV has been largely underestimated in forest plant communities. Methods and Results We first used a simulation experiment where an individual attribute is derived from a high-dimensional model, representing “perfect knowledge” of individual response to the environment, to illustrate how a large observed IV can result from “imperfect knowledge” of the environment. Second, using growth data from clonal Eucalyptus plantations in Brazil, we estimated a major contribution of the environment in determining individual growth. Third, using tree growth data from long-term tropical forest inventories in French Guiana, Panama and India, we showed that tree growth in tropical forests is structured spatially and that despite a large observed IV at the population level, conspecific individuals perform more similarly locally than compared with heterospecific individuals. Synthesis As the number of environmental dimensions that are typically quantified is generally much lower than the actual number of environmental dimensions influencing individual attributes, a great part of observed IV might be misinterpreted as random variation across individuals when in fact it is environmentally-driven. This mis-representation has important consequences for inference about community dynamics. We emphasize that observed IV does not necessarily impact species coexistence per se but can reveal species response to high-dimensional environment, which is consistent with niche theory and the observation of the many differences between species in nature.