Are you comparing Zotero to other reference managers?Choosing the right reference manager for your scholarly documents is very important. Zotero is a modern reference and PDF management system. Authorea is a word processor with an integrated reference management system. Authorea's reference management system is seamlessly integrated inside the word processor so that you don't have to worry about managing references anymore. In this article, we list a few key comparison points that show how Zotero and Authorea are different.

Most research today is not in Open Access JournalsThe majority of research today is published behind a paywall (figure \ref{420454}).  This is unlikely to be the case in the next few years. Particularly since new policies require research to be published in open access journals (figure \ref{420454}).  First coined in the early 90's, open access refers to content that is freely accessible and reusable under specific copyright agreements, such as the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license (CC-BY 4.0). What has lead to the rise of open access journals? How does Authorea, a collaborative authoring platform, fit within the landscape?

The Ingelfinger rule is a policy started by Franz Ingelfinger in 1969 (Definition of Sole C....). Franz, the editor of The New England Journal of Medicine at the time, implemented the policy in order to protect the originality of the journal's publications-- and in effect created arguably one of the most important barriers to open science and preprints today.

Despite its importance for the evolution and final end states of stars, the physics of stellar angular momentum transport remains poorly understood. Recent advances in ensemble asteroseismology has yielded measurements of core rotation in many ascending red giant branch stars (RGB) . The main result (Fig [period]) is that the cores of these stars are rotating at least 10 times slower than what is predicted by state-of-the art models . Moreover, detailed asteroseismic modeling shows that the bulk of radial differential rotation is localized in the radiative region between the H-burning shell and the bottom of the convective envelope . The magnetorotational instability (MRI) has been extensively studied in the context of angular momentum transport in accretion disks. However, it is not clear what role–if any–it might play in the radiative regions of differentially rotating stars. The existing literature is limited , and attempts to simulate this mechanism in stellar interiors have not yielded complete results appropriate for inclusion in stellar evolution codes. We propose to investigate the role of the MRI in stars using simulations that account for the important physical ingredients of stellar radiative regions: stable radial stratification, mean molecular weight gradients, differential rotation, and magnetic fields. These effects are parameterized by the Brunt-Väisälä frequency N, background gradient ∇μ, shear parameter q = dlogΩ/dlogR, and plasma β. emphasized the importance _double-diffusive_ effects in the stellar MRI. These effects occur when there is an imbalance between the microphysical dissipation of momentum ν, magnetic field η, and heat χ. In their analysis, they note that double diffusive effects can both stabilize and destabilize depending on the relative ratio of these coefficients. Here, we will carefully consider the effects of double-diffusive effects by a series of fast, linear solutions to characterize the parameter space most relevant to stellar parameters. Using the Dedalus framework, we will simulate the MRI in a simplified geometry to extract effective torques over a range of parameters. We will then implement these results in a 1D implementation in the MESA code to test against the full set of observations available: the core rotation of red giants, the solar core rotation profile, and the final spin rate of compact remnants. This project is extremely ambitious owing to the many length scales that must be resolved simultaneously and the very large parameter space to be spanned. However, we have at our disposal the ideal tools to make significant progress: the spectral magnetohydrodynamic simulation framework Dedalus and the extremely flexible stellar evolution code MESA. Dedalus provides an excellent platform to study the MRI in stellar interiors: it can be adapted to include the new terms and its spectral accuracy ensures that the widest possible dynamic range for a given resolution (Fig. [Dedalus]). Thanks to the extraordinary results from Kepler asteroseismology and the versatility of the open stellar evolution code MESA, we will be able to immediately test our results against the observations. This project could lead to a novel theory for internal angular momentum transport in stellar interiors, and, among other results, to updated predictions for SN and GRB progenitors. Both the Dedalus and MESA codes are fully open, so our results will be fully testable and reproducible by the astrophysics community. We will publish not only our results, but also our input files and configuration for both codes.

Project Overview                This project focuses on Challenge #2: Expedite the Scoring Process & Expand Onboard Families.                For the first task, Classification and Regression Tree (CART) method is introduced. The decision tree is used to predict how likely an applicant will adopt a child in a permanent manner by examining his/her profile. Taking the probability as the “score”, this method can significantly accelerate the relevant process in an agency.                For the second task, an unfolding multidimensional scaling (MDS) model is adopted. This method helps us visualize what type of children is more attractive to a certain type of families by mapping these two-mode data onto a same plot. The agency can then match families with the closest kids showing on the plot in order to raise their interest in and patience with the adoption process and reduce the attrition rate in the duration.                At last, two interactive tools based on these two methods are designed for Foster Care agencies to quickly score an applicant and match an onboard family with a kid.MethodsSelecting Datasets:                 Adoption and Foster Care Analysis and Reporting System (AFCARS), Adoption File FFY 2015 and Foster Care FFY 2015 by the Children's Bureau (St = “NY”)Generating Variables:1. For Decision Tree: 23 variables in total

A variety of research demonstrates that humans learn and communicate best when more than one processing system (e.g. visual, auditory, touch) is used . And, related research also shows that, no matter how technical the material, most humans also retain and process information best when they can put a narrative "story" to it. So, when considering the future of scholarly communication, we should be careful not to do blithely away with the linear narrative format that articles and books have followed for centuries: instead, we should enrich it.

They say that life is full of surprises. That is the understatement of the moment, especially as it relates to the integration of social media within our career trajectories.  It is difficult to imagine where I would be in a professional capacity in the absence of social media.  My journey in the world of social media began over four years ago, where I facilitated the development of an educational blog known as Emergency Medicine PharmD, which is aimed at defining the role of the emergency medicine pharmacist. My involvement in the blog has allowed me to unite several passions of mine in one vehicle: research and lifelong learning; writing in both scientific terms and prose in the form of storytelling; and emergency medicine pharmacy. At around the same time, I created a professional Twitter account as a means of disseminating newly published entries from the blog to those who followed me in addition to sharing articles and interesting posts related to the practice of emergency medicine pharmacy.  In serving as associate editor of the blog, having authored over 75 educational entries since its inception, and through my active engagement on Twitter, my contributions within the world of social media has propelled my professional career as an emergency medicine pharmacist in ways that I never thought could ever be remotely possible. I realized early on that social media can be leveraged for research purposes and to date, I have had formal publication of three research papers in the medical literature related to social media and pharmacy. With this, I have also been able to interact with several other individuals within the international community of emergency medicine clinicians and collaborate on blog posts and podcasts on various topics as well as participate in research studies and other such activities. Last year, I joined a team of emergency medicine pharmacists from around the country in producing an online curriculum called the Capsules series, which is focused on creating educational modules related to practical pharmacology for the emergency medicine practitioner. One of my greatest achievements to date has been being elected to serve as incoming chair of the Emergency Medicine Practice and Research Network of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy, where I will take the lead on various activities throughout my term on behalf of more than 1,000 members of the network in this national organization. Finally, in their provision of prescriber and patient education related to medication safety, the Food and Drug Administration (yes, THE FDA) cited one of my own blog entries as a featured reference in a recently released drug safety warning. That was the icing on the cake; to have a major federal agency cite my own writing on an education blog in their efforts to enhance medication safety was not only a “mind blown” moment for me, but it also reflects a turning of the tide, demonstrating that our contributions in social media can be influential on the grand scale – and that you never know who may be following your work in these outlets. These opportunities serve as conversation starters of the penultimate question related to social media: “What’s next?”  There is room for improvement in this medium. We need to begin to develop those discussions with folks who may be of the “traditional” mindset, particularly those who may serve on promotion and tenure committees, on the value of social media in professional development in a manner that they can understand and appreciate. No longer should it be conventional to scoff at social media for all of its associations with frivolity and “time wasted”, which has been a traditionally held attitude in the past. As more and more academics, researchers, and clinicians professionally engage in social media, it is also important to recognize the opportunities that arise as a result of their involvement. In addition, social media is not without its shortcomings, not unlike any other medium where information is shared, and one area is in the lax peer review process. There can be any number of methods for conducting peer review, whether it be pre- or post-publication, of material that is open access and available for wider web of readers and users. If this is conducted as a means to enhance the accuracy and quality of information shared within the resource, it may facilitate presentation of the medium in such a way that members of promotion and tenure committees may recognize and value, and perhaps become more receptive in accepting these materials as scholarly activity in the same manner as traditional print publications.  Suffice it to say that social media is indeed here to stay. The window of opportunity in the world of social media is wide, and through these improvements, research and discovery can progress to support and further the work of contributors of this movement.

This is a test QuoteThis is a test lineIn 1985 Aldus Corporation launched its first desktop publishing program Aldus PageMaker for Apple Macintosh computers, released in 1987 for PCs running Windows 1.0. Both contained the variant lorem ipsum most common today. Laura Perry, then art director with Aldus, modified prior versions of Lorem Ipsum text from typographical specimens; in the 1960s and 1970s it appeared often in lettering catalogs by Letraset. Anecdotal evidence has it that Letraset used Lorem ipsum already from 1970 onwards, eg. for grids (page layouts) for ad agencies. Many early desktop publishing programs, eg. Adobe PageMaker, used it to create template.Most text editors like MS Word or Lotus Notes generate random lorem text when needed, either as pre-installed module or plug-in to be added. Word selection or sequence don't necessarily match the original, which is intended to add variety. Presentation software like Keynote or Pages use it as a samples for screenplay layout. Content management software as Joomla, Drupal, Mambo, PHP-Nuke, WordPress, or Movable Type offer Lorem Ipsum plug-ins with the same functionality. test \cite{PEPE_1989}

TitleTitles can occupy no more than three lines of type. Each line should contain no more than 50 characters, including spaces. The title should convey the conceptual significance of the paper to a broad readership.Authors/AffiliationsAuthor names should be spelled out rather than set in initials. Authors should be footnoted to corresponding affiliations. Affiliations should contain the following core information: department(s)/subunit(s); institution; city, state/region, postal code; country. Note: Please check author names and affiliations carefully, as we cannot amend or correct these sections after publication.Corresponding AuthorThe "Correspondence" line should include the e-mail address(es) of the corresponding author(s). One corresponding author is preferred for reasons stated in the Authorship section of Editorial Policies above. But there is no mandatory limit on the number of corresponding authors that may be listed. Corresponding authors may also provide a Twitter handle as a secondary means of contact. Please see the corresponding author responsibilities noted above in the Editorial Policies.Lead ContactEvery author list must identify one corresponding author as a Lead Contact, noted by a footnote in the manuscript. If there is only one corresponding author, that author will be listed as the Lead Contact. Please see the Lead Contact responsibilities noted above in the Authorship section of the Editorial Policies.Additional FootnotesFootnotes are only allowed on page 1 of the text (and in tables). They may include a Lead Contact (mandatory) or a present address (optional), or they may indicate co-first authorship (optional). For more on designations of author contributions, please see the "Authorship" section above, under Editorial Policies.SummaryThe Summary consists of a single paragraph of fewer than 150 words. It should clearly convey the conceptual advance and significance of the work to a broad readership. In particular, the Summary should contain a brief background of the question, a description of the results without extensive experimental detail, and a summary of the significance of the findings. References should not be cited in the Summary.KeywordsAuthors are encouraged to include up to ten keywords that will be associated with the article on Cell Press platforms and on PubMed. These keywords should be listed in the manuscript after the Summary, separated by commas.Highlights and eTOC BlurbHighlights are a short collection of bullet points that convey the core findings of the article. Specifications: up to four bullet points may be included; the length of an individual bullet point should not exceed 85 characters (including spaces); only the core results of the paper should be covered.The eTOC blurb is a short summary of the main take-home message of the paper and should describe the context and significance of the findings for the broader readership. Please see the "In Brief" links in the Table of Contents for examples. Specifications: This blurb should be 50 words or fewer; this blurb should be written in the third person and refer to “First Author et al.”Both are required for all research papers and will be displayed online with the article; however, they will not appear in print. On the EM page where you are asked to upload your files, please choose "Highlights and eTOC Blurb" and upload a single Word document containing both your Highlights and the eTOC Blurb.IntroductionThe Introduction should be succinct, with no subheadings, and should present the background information necessary to provide a biological context for the results.ResultsThis section should be divided with subheadings. Footnotes should not be used.DiscussionThe Discussion should explain the significance of the results and place them into a broader context. It should not be redundant with the Results section. This section may contain subheadings and can in some cases be combined with the Results section.Experimental ProceduresThe Experimental Procedures should, at minimum, include enough detail to allow the reader to understand the general experimental design and to be able to assess the data presented in the figures. More detailed protocols and procedures needed for readers to reproduce experiments should be included in the Supplemental Experimental Procedures. Any supplemental tables that list materials used in the study (oligonucleotides, strains, etc.) should be included within the relevant section of the Supplemental Experimental Procedures; these tables should have a title but should not be numbered. If your paper contains Supplemental Experimental Procedures, please make sure that they are referred to within the main Experimental Procedures so that it is clear to the reader that additional details are available online.   This section should also include a description of any statistical methods employed in the study. A more detailed version of the procedures and details such as oligo sequences, strains, and specifics of how constructs were made can be included in the Supplemental Information, but it is not appropriate to move the majority of the Experimental Procedures to Supplemental Information in order to shorten the text. Please see our complete Supplemental Information guidelines for more information.Author ContributionsFor primary research papers, we ask you to include a dedicated Author Contributions section preceding the Acknowledgments to give information about individual author contributions to the work. Please keep this section as concise as possible and use initials to indicate author identity. All of the authors listed on the paper should be mentioned in this section at least once. We are happy for you to use a traditional format such as “A.B. and C.D. conducted the experiments, E.F. designed the experiments and wrote the paper…” but would also encourage you to use the CRediT taxonomy instead.AcknowledgmentsThis section may acknowledge contributions from non-authors and/or list funding sources, and it should include a statement of any conflicts of interest. Please check this section carefully, as we cannot allow amendments or corrections after publication.ReferencesReferences should include only articles that are published or in press. For references to in press articles, please confirm with the cited journal that the article is in fact accepted and in press and include a DOI number and online publication date. Unpublished data, submitted manuscripts, abstracts, and personal communications should be cited within the text only. Personal communication should be documented by a letter of permission. Submitted articles should be cited as unpublished data, data not shown, or personal communication.In-text citations should be written in Harvard style and not numbered, e.g., "Smith et al., 2015; Smith and Jones, 2015."Please use the style shown below for references. Note that "et al." should only be used after ten authors.Article in a periodical:Sondheimer, N., and Lindquist, S. (2000). Rnq1: an epigenetic modifier of protein function in yeast. Mol. Cell 5, 163–172.Article in a book:King, S.M. (2003). Dynein motors: Structure, mechanochemistry and regulation. In Molecular Motors, M. Schliwa, ed. (Weinheim, Germany: Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH), pp. 45–78.An entire book:Cowan, W.M., Jessell, T.M., and Zipursky, S.L. (1997). Molecular and Cellular Approaches to Neural Development (New York: Oxford University Press).Figure LegendsLegends should be included in the submitted manuscript as a separate section. Each figure legend should have a brief title that describes the entire figure without citing specific panels, followed by a description of each panel. For any figures presenting pooled data, the measures should be defined in the figure legends (for example, "Data are represented as mean ± SEM."). Each legend should refer to any supporting items in the Supplemental Information (e.g., "See also Figure S1.").TablesWhen creating a table, please use the Microsoft Word Table function. Tables should include a title, and footnotes and/or legend should be concise. Include tables in the submitted manuscript as a separate section. Tables not created with the Microsoft Word table function will need to be revised by the author.When creating tables, please adhere to the following guidelines:Do not submit tables in Excel or PDF format. Do not place an Excel table in a Word document. Format tables with Word's Table function; do not use tabs or spaces to create a table. Do not use line breaks or spaces to separate data within a cell. Use separate cells for all discrete data elements within a table. Number tables as Table 1, Table 2, Table 3, etc., rather than as Table 1a, Table 1b, Table 1c, etc. If bold or italic font is used within a table to indicate some feature of the data, please give an explanation of its usage in the legend. All abbreviations within a table must be defined in the table legend or footnotes. Footnotes should be listed with superscript lowercase letters, beginning with “a.” Footnotes may not be listed with numbers or symbols. Supplemental InformationIn general, Supplemental Information is limited to data and other materials that directly support the main conclusions of a paper but cannot be included in the main paper for reasons such as space or file format restrictions. SI should not be used to present data that are preliminary or that conceptually go beyond the main point of the paper.Before submitting your supplemental materials, please refer to our complete instructions in the Supplemental Information guidelines. This page also contains information on submitting movie and other multimedia files.

Manuscripts must be:

A 1. This is not a good thesis because it is an obvious statement 2. Same with this one. 3. This is a good example of a thesis statement because while it is obvious that Gaia gave advice to Zeus, it is not certain that without her advice Zeus would not have succeeded. Because of this, it sets up a specific provable point that the author can persue. B Through the acceptance of the apple, the “author” of the Garden of Eden myth portrays women as the ultimate source of evil. This thesis is good because it contradicts the normal thinking that the snake is the representation of evil and is something one could look to prove in the text.

AbstractLorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipiscing elit. Nunc a feugiat elit. Mauris hendrerit venenatis enim id feugiat augue placerat blandit. Proin dictum sollicitudin dapibus. Curabitur malesuada ante iaculis posuere magna vel molestie ligula. Etiam laoreet vestibulum lorem vel posuere. Phasellus molestie vestibulum ante congue eleifend. Etiam quis ante vitae orci efficitur ullamcorper. Nullam placerat et justo ac varius. Mauris imperdiet urna massa at auctor nunc euismod ut. Cras vitae elit eget dolor semper bibendum sed ut est. Donec neque quam aliquam at metus nec fermentum tincidunt dui.IntroductionQuisque iaculis tellus non bibendum accumsan. Nullam nunc lectus pretium at orci quis dapibus tempor libero. Nulla diam massa pharetra non lectus vestibulum ullamcorper aliquet enim. Vivamus maximus dapibus venenatis. Sed nec orci vitae nulla tristique porttitor. Phasellus id feugiat sapien sit amet suscipit tellus. Aliquam condimentum magna sed enim aliquam porttitor. Mauris ornare justo est in auctor velit elementum et. Donec at tristique nulla nec aliquet justo. Proin felis ipsum sollicitudin ut augue ut ultricies accumsan quam. Vivamus euismod urna sit amet tortor scelerisque condimentum. Nulla eget pulvinar nunc. Donec eget ligula lobortis nisi vulputate euismod a non felis. Integer tempor placerat porttitor.Materials and MethodsSed non purus dapibus venenatis erat a sagittis ex. Nam vitae egestas nulla. Fusce malesuada felis id ligula malesuada accumsan. Integer sodales nisi sapien at porta magna accumsan eu. Etiam semper varius urna a molestie. Praesent quis sapien justo. Nunc vel sagittis tortor vitae sodales libero. Orci varius natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient montes nascetur ridiculus mus. Ut at nisl eros. Nullam turpis justo lobortis ut nulla eu molestie laoreet nulla. Sed ullamcorper sit amet leo eget lobortis.Results and DiscussionIn convallis lacus vel facilisis bibendum. Quisque at nisi vel massa sollicitudin vulputate. Nam iaculis ipsum at metus hendrerit et dictum neque eleifend. In mattis mauris eget dolor ultricies sed bibendum purus consequat. Nam vel imperdiet tortor. Curabitur ut quam porttitor malesuada quam nec vehicula nibh. Nulla nec leo eu metus lobortis laoreet.\(x=\frac{-b\pm\sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2a}\\)

Abstract Abstract Abstract Abstract Abstract Abstract Abstract Abstract Abstract AbstractAbstract Abstract Abstract Abstract Abstract Abstract Abstract Abstract Abstract AbstractAbstract Abstract Abstract Abstract Abstract Abstract Abstract Abstract Abstract AbstractAbstract Abstract Abstract Abstract Abstract Abstract Abstract Abstract Abstract AbstractAbstract Abstract Abstract Abstract Abstract Abstract Abstract Abstract Abstract AbstractAbstract Abstract Abstract Abstract Abstract Abstract Abstract Abstract Abstract AbstractAbstract Abstract Abstract Abstract Abstract Abstract Abstract Abstract Abstract Abstract

An abstract of approximately 100 to 150 words identifying the new and significant results of the study must be provided for all manuscripts including articles reviews and communications. The abstract should comprise a brief and factual account of the contents and conclusions of the paper as well as an indication of any new information presented and its relevance. Abstracts should be self-contained. References to formulae equations or references that appear in the main text are not permissible.

What is Lorem Ipsum?Lorem Ipsum is simply dummy text of the printing and typesetting industry. Lorem Ipsum has been the industry's standard dummy text ever since the 1500s, when an unknown printer took a galley of type and scrambled it to make a type specimen book. It has survived not only five centuries, but also the leap into electronic typesetting, remaining essentially unchanged. It was popularised in the 1960s with the release of Letraset sheets containing Lorem Ipsum passages, and more recently with desktop publishing software like Aldus PageMaker including versions of Lorem Ipsum.Why do we use it?It is a long established fact that a reader will be distracted by the readable content of a page when looking at its layout. The point of using Lorem Ipsum is that it has a more-or-less normal distribution of letters, as opposed to using 'Content here, content here', making it look like readable English. Many desktop publishing packages and web page editors now use Lorem Ipsum as their default model text, and a search for 'lorem ipsum' will uncover many web sites still in their infancy. Various versions have evolved over the years, sometimes by accident, sometimes on purpose (injected humour and the like).

AbstractInsert abstract information here.Insert Received for publication Date and in final form DateInsert Corresponding address and emailsPlace the Author addresses here

Lab 8 explored the use of an RS232 port to communicate between the FPGA and pieces of circuits that are off of the board. I was able to compile a circuit which listened to the port and transmitted the incoming signal back over the RS232 port to display it on the serial port of a computer. This lab was very useful in showing how one would connect an FPGA to more complicated circuitry and transmit data between the two, allowing the FPGA to add as a central microprocessor for a more complicated lab.

Looking for a better alternative to Endnote?EndNote is among the oldest and most often pilloried reference managers out there. EndNote continues to frustrate users year after year while new tools such as Authorea develop new and improved ways to manage references.In this article, we list a few key comparison points that show how Endnote and Authorea are different.