This study presents a systematic scoping review of delegated voting in decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs), focusing on its governance implications, implementation forms, and challenges. While delegated voting is often adopted to address low participation and mitigate the cognitive burden of direct involvement, the existing literature highlights its potential to exacerbate centralization, particularly when whales or influential networks are disproportionate. Various implementation models, including offchain platforms (e.g., Snapshot), hybrid governance architectures, and token-based delegation systems, exhibit distinct trade-offs in transparency, cost, and adaptability. Although innovations such as quadratic voting, weighted delegation constraints, and reputation-based governance show promise for improving fairness and accountability, they also face vulnerabilities, such as gaming, collusion, and high implementation complexity. Synthesizing insights from 13 publications, this review offers recommendations ranging from multi-tier governance structures to AI-driven support tools that aim to balance efficiency, inclusivity, and trust in DAO voting processes, thereby informing robust context-aware governance.