An Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) system must intelligently deal with the semantics of the situations it encounters. The flexibility required for intelligent responses is at odds with the fixed parameter spaces of statistical methods or the limitations of the rule-based syntax of the computing paradigms on which systems can now be built. Overcoming these limitations requires philosophical insights from the work of Kant, Wittgenstein, Heidegger, and Gadamer, covering ontology, epistemology, hermeneutics, axiology, and teleology. Specifically, additional teleological computations (to determine the purpose served, independently from the computations responsible for responding appropriately in the world), are necessary to overcome these shortcomings.These insights suggest using a new abstraction to satisfy the necessity for two computational processes to execute in parallel on their respective, related but different representations. The processes must consist of algorithms specifiable a priori, to apply in all possible situations. In this paper, we address some specific difficulties with concepts and show how these difficulties may be overcome using the new abstraction of higher-level perceptions proposed in the Subjective Emergence of Objective Minds (SEOM) model developed earlier.In this paper, we will focus on the representations and teleological computations necessary to give purpose to the actions of autonomous intelligent agents.