<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<article xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="1.1" xml:lang="en">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id>authorea</journal-id>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>Authorea</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.15200/winn.147296.69865</article-id>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Seven year units in science: general lessons from the personal
experience of working on adrenal cortex innervation and cortisol
secretion</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
          <name>
            <surname>Charlton</surname>
            <given-names>Bruce</given-names>
          </name>
          <address>
            <institution>School of Psychology, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, England</institution>
          </address>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <pub-date date-type="preprint" publication-format="electronic">
        <day>17</day>
        <month>4</month>
        <year>2023</year>
      </pub-date>
      <self-uri xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.15200/winn.147296.69865">This preprint is available at https://doi.org/10.15200/winn.147296.69865</self-uri>
      <abstract abstract-type="abstract">
        <p>It seems to me that the learning and practice of science naturally falls
into approximately seven year units; and indeed the same could be said
about ‘life’. (Note: My operational definition of ‘seven’ is ‘more than
five but less than ten’.)  My academic life has certainly been
consistent with this idea; and here I describe the first seven year unit
of my work as an active scientist: this was the seven years I spent as a
laboratory researcher focused primarily on the adrenal cortex. This unit
was successful; in the sense that I solved, to my own satisfaction, the
problem I was working-on. There may be some general interest and
instruction to be derived from taking this specific example as a
generalisable account of the different phases and aspects of an arc of
science – how a line of research may be initiated, developed and
brought to a conclusion. Furthermore, it is suggested that other
scientists might (if it comes naturally to them) consider changing their
focus and developing new interests every seven years or so.</p>
      </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
</article>
