loading page

Afforestation may aggravate the trade-off between water-related ecosystem services in degraded ecosystems
  • +8
  • Peng Zhang,
  • Jiaqi Yu,
  • Xianglong Xing,
  • Yuqi Tang,
  • Hengqi Yan,
  • Zhongbo Zhao,
  • Lin Yuan,
  • Chunjing Li,
  • Ri Jin,
  • Weihong Zhu,
  • Jingzhi Wang
Peng Zhang
Yanbian University
Author Profile
Jiaqi Yu
Jilin International Studies University
Author Profile
Xianglong Xing
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
Author Profile
Yuqi Tang
Yanbian University
Author Profile
Hengqi Yan
Jilin Earthquake Agency
Author Profile
Zhongbo Zhao
Yanbian University
Author Profile
Lin Yuan
Yanbian University
Author Profile
Chunjing Li
Yanbian University
Author Profile
Ri Jin
Yanbian University
Author Profile
Weihong Zhu
Jilin Provincial Joint Key Laboratory of Changbai Mountain Wetland and Ecology
Author Profile
Jingzhi Wang
Yanbian University

Corresponding Author:jzwang@ybu.edu.cn

Author Profile

Abstract

Land use change is a main factor of affecting water-related ecosystem services (WESs), critical for managing aquatic ecosystem. Nevertheless, how to establish the connection between realistic land management and optimizing WESs is unclear. To address this issue, we selected a typical ecologically vulnerable area, the Ussuri River Basin in China, as an analyzed domain to reveal the driving mechanism of WESs. Furthermore, four land scenarios were established to unfold the connection between land use and WESs. The results are as follows: from 2000 to 2018, cropland expansion led to increases of nitrogen export (+11.55%) and phosphorous export (+12.50%), along with increased food production (+127.27%) and water yield services (+1.41%). We found that the trade-offs occurred mainly within provisioning services (between water yield and food production) or regulating services (between water purification and soil retention). Regarding future scenarios, the traditional ”Grain for Green” scenario failed to benefit ecosystems, not only increasing the trade-off intensity of ecosystem services, but leading to competitive relationships in WESs. As a result, afforestation may not be an optimal solution for the restoration of degraded ecosystems, especially in water-limited areas. The forestland buffer zone scenario was regarded as the optimal land practice, in which WESs were enhanced significantly and trade-offs were reduced between provisioning services, indicating that tree-planting near waters maintained both ecological benefits and fundamental grain outputs. These results highlighted importance of land management on WESs, offering a prospective evaluation of ecosystem service benefits under future development pathway.