Determination of collisional cross section using microscale high-field
asymmetric waveform ion mobility spectroscopy-mass spectrometry
(FAIMS-MS).
Abstract
RATIONALE: Collisional cross sections (CCS) are an important
characteristic of gas-phase ions that are measured using ion
mobility-mass spectrometry (IMS). Typically, CCS measurements are
performed with drift-tube IMS or travelling-wave IMS. However. in a
high-field asymmetric waveform ion mobility (FAIMS) device, the
non-linear path through the device makes CCS determination more
challenging. This research explores whether CCS can be predicted using a
microscale FAIMS by using known CCS standards. METHODS: An
Owlstone ultraFAIMS microscale FAIMS spectrometer was coupled to an
Orbitrap Exactive mass spectrometer. 2 different CCS standard mixtures
(tetraalkylammonium halides and poly-DL-alanine oligomers) were used to
evaluate the systems potential to predict CCS. Test peptides bradykinin
acetate and substance P were used to determine prediction accuracy for
singly and doubly charged peptide species using external calibration
with a series of poly-DL-alanine peptides for +1, +2 charge states.
RESULTS: Calibrations with excellent correlation coefficients
(R 2 = 0.99) for both TAAHs and poly-DL-alanine were
obtained. Good predictive accuracy was achieved for bradykinin
[M+2H] 2+ with a ±0.5% difference between
experimental and published CCS at a dispersion field strength (DF) of
250 Td, the model proved less accurate for bradykinin [M+H]
+ (±1.4% at 240 Td). The prediction accuracy for the
[M+H] + and [M+2H] 2+ ions
of substance P was within ±5% and ±3% at 250 Td respectively, while at
higher DF values accuracy decreased to approximately 5%.
CONCLUSIONS: Distinct relationships were observed between CCS
and transmission CF with both calibrants. Optimum predictive performance
was obtained at DF strengths of 240-260 Td. At lower DF accuracy is
reduced by insufficient resolution of analyte ions from solvent cluster
adducts while at higher DF values, poor transmission becomes a factor.
Nevertheless, these data suggest microscale FAIMS can conduct CCS
measurements with reasonable accuracy when the compound being measured
has similar structural features to the CCS standards used.