loading page

Island population demography: Breeding dynamics and drivers of Gotland’s iconic Golden Eagles
  • +2
  • Navinder Singh,
  • Robin Olofsson,
  • Aemilius van der Meiden,
  • Andres Lopez-Peinado,
  • Johan Månsson
Navinder Singh
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Faculty of Forest Sciences

Corresponding Author:navinder.singh@slu.se

Author Profile
Robin Olofsson
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Faculty of Forest Sciences
Author Profile
Aemilius van der Meiden
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Faculty of Forest Sciences
Author Profile
Andres Lopez-Peinado
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Faculty of Forest Sciences
Author Profile
Johan Månsson
County Administrative Board of Gotland County
Author Profile

Abstract

Raptor populations on islands are limited by resource availability and the dispersal possibilities for young birds, which are often determined by the size of the island. This leads to differences in population dynamics and viability compared to mainland populations. Human land use modifications on islands—such as agriculture, forestry, excessive hunting, and urban infrastructure development—may affect resource availability and increase risks to these populations. Consequently, many island raptor populations have been dramatically reduced or driven to extinction and have never fully recovered. The conditions necessary for their long-term persistence remain uncertain. Gotland, a large, human-dominated island located in the Baltic Sea, is home to one of the densest populations of Golden Eagles (Aquila chrysaetos). However, the drivers of population dynamics remain unknown, and many speculations exist that require empirical testing. Approximately 86 Golden Eagle territories were identified and surveyed across Gotland. We investigated the spatial drivers of breeding dynamics in this eagle population, evaluating the effects of habitat composition, prey density, and neighborhood effects on territorial productivity. The average productivity was 0.41 fledglings per pair, which varied annually, with approximately 72% of territories occupied and 32% being successful. Despite significant variation in habitat composition across territories, spatial differences in productivity were primarily influenced by the proportion of coniferous forest (nesting habitat), greater prey diversity, the density of non-native roe deer (Capreolus capreolus), and the reproductive status of neighboring territories. Several novel findings emerged: the role of roe deer as a potential prey species introduced by humans has been previously underappreciated, proximity to the coast was associated with increased productivity, and the variation in spatio-temporal reproductive dynamics across neighboring territories appears to influence overall population dynamics. We discuss the general implications of these novel findings for the long-term conservation and persistence of this iconic island population and similar populations worldwide.
29 Nov 2024Submitted to Oikos
03 Dec 2024Submission Checks Completed
03 Dec 2024Assigned to Editor
06 Dec 2024Review(s) Completed, Editorial Evaluation Pending
10 Dec 2024Reviewer(s) Assigned