loading page

Comparing the Outcomes of Neoadjuvant Versus Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Osteosarcoma: A National Cancer Database Study
  • +3
  • Luke J. Dotson,
  • Kyle W. Blackburn,
  • Davinder Mand,
  • Trevor Trudeau,
  • Rashmi Agarwal,
  • Russell Ward
Luke J. Dotson
Baylor College of Medicine School of Medicine
Author Profile
Kyle W. Blackburn
Baylor College of Medicine School of Medicine
Author Profile
Davinder Mand
Baylor Scott & White Medical Center Temple
Author Profile
Trevor Trudeau
Baylor College of Medicine School of Medicine
Author Profile
Rashmi Agarwal
Baylor Scott & White Medical Center Temple
Author Profile
Russell Ward
Baylor Scott & White Medical Center Temple

Corresponding Author:russell.ward@bswhealth.org

Author Profile

Abstract

Background: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery and subsequent adjuvant chemotherapy, has been a mainstay of many osteosarcoma treatment protocols. However, the overall survival benefit over surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy is unclear. This study directly compares the outcomes among these treatment groups using a large population in the National Cancer Database. Methods: Patients with osteosarcoma in the National Cancer Database (2004-2019) were stratified based on chemotherapy and surgery timing (neoadjuvant and adjuvant vs adjuvant-only chemotherapy). We used Kaplan-Meier curves to compare OS in the unmatched population and in a propensity score matched cohort that controlled for demographics, treatment, and tumor characteristic differences. Univariate and multivariate analyses were also used to predict the likelihood of positive margins among the population. Chi-square tests were used to compare 30- and 90-day mortality among treatment groups. Results: The study population included 4,659 patients: 3,733 neoadjuvant and 926 adjuvant-only chemotherapy regimens. Patients who underwent neoadjuvant therapy had significantly longer survival in the unmatched analysis (p<0.001), but this difference narrowed when controlling for covariates in the matched cohort (p=0.64). Mortality at 30 and 90 days was insignificant between treatment groups in both the full and matched cohorts (p=0.3 and p=0.9 respectively). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens predominated with over 75% utilization, but this rate remained constant during the 15-year study period. Three- and five-year survival were relatively unchanged during this period at 75% and 62.5% respectively. Factors significantly associated with positive margins in the multivariate analysis included adjuvant-only chemotherapy (OR=1.6, p<0.001), older age (OR=1.01, p<0.001), female sex (OR=1.27, p=0.04), adjuvant radiation (OR=4.96, p<0.001), and stage IVB tumors (OR=2.11, p<0.001). Conclusions: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy did not increase overall or short-term survival compared to adjuvant chemotherapy alone in our study. However, neoadjuvant therapy was associated with fewer positive margins at the time of surgery in this analysis.
23 Nov 2024Submitted to Cancer Reports
25 Nov 2024Submission Checks Completed
25 Nov 2024Assigned to Editor
25 Nov 2024Review(s) Completed, Editorial Evaluation Pending
25 Dec 2024Reviewer(s) Assigned