loading page

Factors influencing equine veterinarians’ job satisfaction and retention: A focus group study
  • +6
  • Kristen Whitaker,
  • Audrey Burnette,
  • Jean-Yin Tan,
  • Meggan Graves,
  • Julie Hunt,
  • Elizabeth Devine,
  • Stacy L. Anderson,
  • Katherine Kirkendall,
  • Lauren Wisnieski
Kristen Whitaker
Lincoln Memorial University College of Veterinary Medicine
Author Profile
Audrey Burnette
Lincoln Memorial University DeBusk College of Osteopathic Medicine
Author Profile
Jean-Yin Tan
University of Calgary
Author Profile
Meggan Graves
The University of Tennessee Knoxville College of Veterinary Medicine
Author Profile
Julie Hunt
Lincoln Memorial University College of Veterinary Medicine
Author Profile
Elizabeth Devine
Lincoln Memorial University College of Veterinary Medicine
Author Profile
Stacy L. Anderson
Lincoln Memorial University College of Veterinary Medicine
Author Profile
Katherine Kirkendall
Lincoln Memorial University College of Veterinary Medicine
Author Profile
Lauren Wisnieski
Lincoln Memorial University College of Veterinary Medicine

Corresponding Author:lauren.wisnieski@lmunet.edu

Author Profile

Abstract

Background: There is a shortage of equine veterinarians. Understanding what factors are associated with job satisfaction in equine veterinarians can inform interventions to increase retention in equine medicine. Objective: To explore the prominent factors causing work dissatisfaction and burnout in equine veterinarians. Study design: A qualitative research study was conducted that consisted of semi-structured focus groups. Methods: Thirty-seven current and former equine veterinarians across the United States were recruited via snowball and convenience sampling to answer questions on work history, work-life balance, and perceptions of equine practice. Transcripts were analyzed in Delve and coded in the context of the Conservation of Resources (COR) theory. A card sorting activity was used to rank the four types of resources in the COR theory (condition, object, energy, personal). Results: Condition resources were the most frequently mentioned reasons for work dissatisfaction. These included issues with discrimination or bias due to age, race/ethnicity, and gender, unpredictable and long hours, and heavy workload. Object resources, such as equipment, were rarely mentioned. Energy resources, including pay and student loan debt, were influential, with most participants feeling that equine veterinarians are underpaid. Personal resources, such as problem-solving skills and enjoyment in helping others, improved job satisfaction. Main limitations: Although recruiting efforts prioritized perspectives of black, indigenous, and people of color (BIPOC), lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer plus (LGBTQ+) identities, and members with disabilities, demographic information was not directly collected. Conclusions: The main barriers to equine veterinary retention included lack of work-life balance, long hours, lower-than-expected pay, and issues with discrimination and bias. This study highlights areas for intervention to improve the equine veterinary field, such as higher pay, rural practice incentives, and effective diversity, equity, inclusion, and belonging (DEIB) efforts. A shift toward caseload-sharing between veterinarians could help alleviate excessive emergency on-call and burnout.
20 Sep 2024Submitted to Equine Veterinary Journal
23 Sep 2024Submission Checks Completed
23 Sep 2024Assigned to Editor
23 Sep 2024Review(s) Completed, Editorial Evaluation Pending
26 Sep 2024Reviewer(s) Assigned
08 Nov 2024Editorial Decision: Revise Minor
21 Nov 20241st Revision Received
22 Nov 2024Submission Checks Completed
22 Nov 2024Assigned to Editor
22 Nov 2024Review(s) Completed, Editorial Evaluation Pending
10 Dec 2024Editorial Decision: Accept