Essential Site Maintenance: Authorea-powered sites will be updated circa 15:00-17:00 Eastern on Tuesday 5 November.
There should be no interruption to normal services, but please contact us at help@authorea.com in case you face any issues.

loading page

Machine Learning-Driven Microwave Imaging for Soil Moisture Estimation near Leaky Pipe
  • Mohammad Ramezaninia,
  • mohammadreza shams,
  • Mohammad Zoofaghari
Mohammad Ramezaninia
Yazd University

Corresponding Author:mohammadramezaninia@gmail.com

Author Profile
mohammadreza shams
Sharif University of Technology
Author Profile
Mohammad Zoofaghari
Yazd University
Author Profile

Abstract

Characterizing soil moisture (SM) around drip irrigation pipes is crucial for precise and optimized farming. Machine learning (ML) approaches are particularly suitable for this task as they can reduce uncertainties caused by soil conditions and the drip pipe positions, using features extracted from relevant datasets. This letter addresses local moisture detection in the vicinity of dripping pipes using a portable microwave imaging system. The employed ML approach is fed with two dimensional images generated by two different microwave imaging techniques based on spatio-temporal measurements at various frequency bands. The study investigates the performance of K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN) and Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) algorithms for moisture classification based on these images in three scenarios: before clutter removal, after clutter removal, and after applying imaging techniques such as back projection and the Born approximation. We also explore the potentials of CNN and KNN for moisture estimation around the plant roots and in the presence of pebbles. The results demonstrate the more accurate moisture estimation using CNN when it is applied after clutter reduction considering back projection algorithm (BPA) as the imaging technique. The results indicate that using the Back Projection technique for image formation, combined with CNN for classification, improves leak detection accuracy by approximately 20% compared to other methods.
20 Aug 2024Submitted to Electronics Letters
23 Aug 2024Submission Checks Completed
23 Aug 2024Assigned to Editor
23 Aug 2024Review(s) Completed, Editorial Evaluation Pending
24 Aug 2024Reviewer(s) Assigned
01 Sep 2024Editorial Decision: Revise Major
27 Sep 20241st Revision Received
01 Oct 2024Assigned to Editor
01 Oct 2024Submission Checks Completed
01 Oct 2024Review(s) Completed, Editorial Evaluation Pending
01 Oct 2024Reviewer(s) Assigned
09 Oct 2024Editorial Decision: Revise Minor
10 Oct 20242nd Revision Received
14 Oct 2024Assigned to Editor
14 Oct 2024Submission Checks Completed
14 Oct 2024Review(s) Completed, Editorial Evaluation Pending
14 Oct 2024Reviewer(s) Assigned
15 Oct 2024Editorial Decision: Accept