What´s in a Trait? Reconceptualizing Neurodevelopmental Timing by
Seizing Insights from Philosophy and EvoDevo
Abstract
Philosophy has long been debated for its relevance to natural sciences.
Drawing from evolutionary biology, I exemplify how philosophy
contributed to scientific discourse, in particular to the concept of
genes and traits. Rather than determining distinct traits, genes
influence the plastic development of traits, especially during sensitive
periods. EvoDevo further integrates philosophical insights to explore
how developmental processes influence evolutionary change. I highlight
the concept of heterochrony which describes temporal changes of
developmental events during evolution. I argue that neuroscience could
also benefit from similar conceptual scrutiny. In the paper, I discuss
the expansion of the human neocortex in light of heterochrony and
developmental plasticity as a key example. Plasticity allows organisms
to adapt to fluctuating environments characteristic of the human
cognitive niche and contributes to diversity. As an effect of
heterochrony, postnatal brain development in modern humans is prolonged
and the brain remains highly plastic. While periods of plasticity enable
developmental variability, they also introduce the risk of
neurodevelopmental aberrations, such as in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia
is characterized by an abnormal prolongation of neuroplasticity due to
an impaired excitatory/inhibitory balance and excessive synaptic
pruning, particularly in the prefrontal cortex. This “overpruning”
combined with delayed maturation may contribute to the disorder´s onset
and progression. The interplay between environmental factors and
neurodevelopment during sensitive periods is crucial in shaping the
disease outcome. This reconceptualization challenges traditional
gene-for-trait paradigms and instead advocates for a focus on
developmental timing during different life stages to better understand
the etiology of psychopathologies and potential intervention strategies.