loading page

How effective are face coverings in reducing transmission of COVID-19?
  • +5
  • Joshua Robinson,
  • Ioatzin Rios de Anda,
  • Fergus Moore,
  • Florence Gregson,
  • Jonathan Reid,
  • Lewis Husain,
  • Richard Sear,
  • C. Royall
Joshua Robinson
University of Bristol
Author Profile
Ioatzin Rios de Anda
University of Bristol
Author Profile
Fergus Moore
University of Bristol
Author Profile
Florence Gregson
University of Bristol
Author Profile
Jonathan Reid
University of Bristol
Author Profile
Lewis Husain
Institute of Development Studies
Author Profile
Richard Sear
University of Surrey
Author Profile
C. Royall
ESPCI Paris

Corresponding Author:paddy.royall@espci.fr

Author Profile

Abstract

In the COVID–19 pandemic, billions are wearing face masks, in both health care settings and in public. Which type of mask we should wear in what situation, is therefore important. There are three basic types: cotton, surgical, and respirators (e.g. N95 and similar). All are essentially air filters worn on the face. Here we show that the underlying physics of air filtration ensures particles with diameters ≥ 1 to 3 µm are efficiently filtered out by all three types. However, for particles in the submicrometre range the efficiency depends on the material properties of the masks. For good quality cotton and surgical masks it is in the range 30 to 60%, while it is above 95% for respirators. So air filtration is relatively well understood, however, we have almost no direct evidence on the relative role played by aerosols of differing sizes in disease transmission. Without this data, selecting the correct mask will inevitably involve some guess work. If the virus concentration is assumed independent of aerosol size, then most virus will be in aerosols & 1µm and we expect both surgical masks and multi-layered cotton masks to be effective at reducing the risk of airborne transmission in most settings.