loading page

Which factors can influence the number of forced expiratory maneuvers on spirometry in schoolchildren?
  • Rafaela Minsky
Rafaela Minsky
Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina Centro de Ciencias da Saude e do Esporte

Corresponding Author:rafacoelho@gmail.com

Author Profile

Abstract

Introduction: Spirometry is of great value for understanding respiratory function and management of lung diseases. However, it presents special challenges when performed in children. Objective: To analyze factors that may influence the number of forced expiratory maneuvers required for successful spirometry in schoolchildren. Method: Healthy children aged between 6 and 12 years were tested. Forced spirometry maneuvers were conducted according to the American Thoracic Society. The children were grouped according to the number of attempts (maximum of eight). Factors that potentially influenced the number of maneuvers included: age; pulse oscillometry parameters; slow vital capacity; respiratory muscle strength; orofacial motor function, school performance, physical activity and quality of life. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was performed, followed by the Chi-Square, repeated measures ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis tests. Next, multinomial logistic regression was applied. Significance level was set at 5%. Results: 149 children (80 girls) with mean age of 9.13 years (± 1.98) were studied. Age was related to the required number of spirometry maneuvers and children with poor school performance had a 2.84- fold greater chance of completing the exam in more than five attempts. Conclusion: Age and school performance influenced the number of forced expiratory maneuvers required for successful spirometry in schoolchildren.
04 Jun 2020Submitted to International Journal of Clinical Practice
09 Jun 2020Submission Checks Completed
09 Jun 2020Assigned to Editor
09 Jun 2020Reviewer(s) Assigned
21 Jun 2020Review(s) Completed, Editorial Evaluation Pending
07 Aug 20201st Revision Received
19 Sep 2020Submission Checks Completed
19 Sep 2020Assigned to Editor
19 Sep 2020Reviewer(s) Assigned
23 Sep 2020Review(s) Completed, Editorial Evaluation Pending
03 Nov 20202nd Revision Received
07 Nov 2020Assigned to Editor
07 Nov 2020Submission Checks Completed
07 Nov 2020Reviewer(s) Assigned
23 Nov 2020Review(s) Completed, Editorial Evaluation Pending
22 Dec 20203rd Revision Received
22 Dec 2020Submission Checks Completed
22 Dec 2020Assigned to Editor
22 Dec 2020Reviewer(s) Assigned
28 Dec 2020Review(s) Completed, Editorial Evaluation Pending
12 Jan 20214th Revision Received
12 Jan 2021Submission Checks Completed
12 Jan 2021Assigned to Editor
12 Jan 2021Reviewer(s) Assigned
13 Jan 2021Review(s) Completed, Editorial Evaluation Pending
13 Jan 2021Editorial Decision: Accept
19 Jan 2021Published in International Journal of Clinical Practice. 10.1111/ijcp.14028