loading page

Perturbing the energy landscape for improved packing during computational protein design
  • +8
  • Jack Maguire,
  • Hugh Haddox,
  • Devin Strickland,
  • Samer Halabiya,
  • Brian Coventry,
  • Matthew Cummins,
  • David Thieker,
  • Eric Klavins,
  • Frank DiMaio,
  • David Baker,
  • Brian Kuhlman
Jack Maguire
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Corresponding Author:jack@med.unc.edu

Author Profile
Hugh Haddox
University of Washington
Author Profile
Devin Strickland
University of Washington
Author Profile
Samer Halabiya
University of Washington
Author Profile
Brian Coventry
University of Washington
Author Profile
Matthew Cummins
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Author Profile
David Thieker
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Author Profile
Eric Klavins
University of Washington
Author Profile
Frank DiMaio
University of Washington
Author Profile
David Baker
University of Washington
Author Profile
Brian Kuhlman
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Author Profile

Abstract

The FastDesign protocol in the molecular modeling program Rosetta iterates between sequence optimization and structure refinement to stabilize de novo designed protein structures and complexes. FastDesign has been used previously to design novel protein folds and assemblies with important applications in research and medicine. To promote sampling of alternative conformations and sequences, FastDesign includes stages where the energy landscape is smoothened by reducing repulsive forces. Here, we discover that this process disfavors larger amino acids in the protein core because the protein compresses in the early stages of refinement. By testing alternative ramping strategies for the repulsive weight, we arrive at a scheme that produces lower energy designs with more native-like sequence composition in the protein core. We further validate the protocol by designing and experimentally characterizing over 4000 proteins and show that the new protocol produces higher stability proteins.
18 May 2020Submitted to PROTEINS: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics
19 May 2020Submission Checks Completed
19 May 2020Assigned to Editor
11 Jun 2020Reviewer(s) Assigned
19 Jul 2020Review(s) Completed, Editorial Evaluation Pending
26 Aug 2020Editorial Decision: Revise Major
29 Sep 20201st Revision Received
06 Oct 2020Submission Checks Completed
06 Oct 2020Assigned to Editor
06 Oct 2020Reviewer(s) Assigned
22 Oct 2020Review(s) Completed, Editorial Evaluation Pending
21 Nov 2020Editorial Decision: Accept
Apr 2021Published in Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics volume 89 issue 4 on pages 436-449. 10.1002/prot.26030