Multi-campaign analysis of smoke properties and cloud interactions in
the Southeast Atlantic using ORACLES, LASIC, and CLARIFY data with
WRF-CAM5
- Calvin Howes,
- Pablo Saide,
- Sharon Burton,
- Hugh Coe,
- Amie Dobracki,
- Marta Fenn,
- Richard Ferrare,
- Steffen Freitag,
- Johnathan Hair,
- Steven Howell,
- Siddhant Gupta,
- Uin Janek,
- Mary Kacarab,
- Chongai Kuang,
- L. Ruby Leung,
- Athanasios Nenes,
- Arthur Sedlacek,
- Kenneth Thornhill,
- Jenny Wong,
- Robert Wood,
- Huihui Wu,
- Yang Zhang,
- Paquita Zuidema
Calvin Howes
University of California Los Angeles
Corresponding Author:calvinhowes@ucla.edu
Author ProfileSiddhant Gupta
University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign
Author ProfileAthanasios Nenes
Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne
Author ProfileAbstract
The southeast Atlantic Ocean provides an excellent natural laboratory to
study smoke-cloud interactions, a large driver of uncertainty in climate
projections. The value of studying this in particular region is largely
attributable to two factors---the expansive, bright, semi-permanent
stratocumulus cloud deck and the fact that southern Africa is the
largest source of biomass-burning aerosols in the world. We study this
region using the WRF-Chem model with CAM5 aerosols and in situ
observations from the ORACLES, LASIC, and CLARIFY field campaigns, all
of which overlapped in August 2017. Across these campaigns, we compare
aerosol, cloud, and thermodynamic variables to quantify model
performance and expand upon observational findings of aerosol-cloud
effects. Specifically, our approach is to analyze aerosol and cloud
properties along flight tracks, picking out uniform legs within
tropospheric smoke plumes and in the boundary layer. This unique
approach allows us to sample the high spatiotemporal variability that
can get lost to large-scale averaging. It also allows process-level
comparison of local cloud responses to aerosol conditions, and measure
model performance in those same processes. Along with better quantifying
model predictive power, we find and justify updates to model parameters
and processes to better emulate observations, notably aerosol size
parameters. Preliminary results suggest that WRF-CAM5 is activating a
smaller percentage of aerosols into cloud droplets than shown in
observations, which could lead to biased modeling of aerosol indirect
radiative effects on a larger scale. We explore this effect further with
CCN activation tendency, updraft, particle sizing, and composition
analysis, as well as broader dynamics like entrainment and removal
rates. Comparing the model with similar instrument suites across
multiple colocated campaigns also allows us to quantify instrument
uncertainty in ways that a focus on a single campaign cannot and gives
further context to the model performance.